Sun, Sea, Sand and Scandal

 Articles  Comments Off on Sun, Sea, Sand and Scandal
Apr 032017
 

Sun, Sea, Sand and Scandal

1st Battalion The Royal Green Jackets

1993 to 1996

Dhekelia, Cyprus 

Akrotiri and Dhekelia, officially the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia (abbr. SBA; Greek: Περιοχές Κυρίαρχων Βάσεων Ακρωτηρίου και Δεκέλιας, Periochés Kyríarchon Váseon Akrotiríou kai Dekélias; Turkish: Egemen Üs Bölgeleri Ağrotur ve Dikelya), is a British Overseas Territory on the island of Cyprus. 

The areas, which include British military bases and installations, as well as other land, were retained by the British under the 1960 treaty of independence, signed by the United Kingdom, Greece, Turkey and representatives from the Greek and Turkish Cypriot communities, which granted independence to the Crown colony of Cyprus.

The territory serves an important role as a station for signals intelligence and provides a vital strategic part of the United Kingdom communications gathering and monitoring network in the Mediterranean and the Middle East.

The territory is comprised of two Base Areas. One is Akrotiri (Greek: Ακρωτήρι pronounced (akroˈtiri); Turkish: Ağrotur (ˈɑɰɾotuɾ), or the Western Sovereign Base Area (WSBA), which includes two main bases at RAF Akrotiri and Episkopi, plus all of Akrotiri Village’s district (including Limassol Salt Lake) and parts of eleven other village districts.

The other area is Dhekelia Cantonment (Δεκέλεια [ðeˈceʎa]; Dikelya), or the Eastern Sovereign Base Area (ESBA), which includes a base at Ayios Nikolaos plus parts of twelve village districts.

History of Cyprus since 1878

The Sovereign Base Areas were created in 1960 by the London and Zurich Agreements, when Cyprus achieved independence from the British Empire.

The United Kingdom desired to retain sovereignty over these areas, as this guaranteed the use of UK military bases on Cyprus, including RAF Akrotiri, and a garrison of the British Army.

The importance of the bases to the British is based on the strategic location of the island, at the eastern edge of the Mediterranean, close to the Suez Canal and the Middle East; the ability to use the RAF base as staging post for military aircraft; and for training.

In 1974, following a military coup by the Cypriot National Guard attempting to achieve enosis (union with Greece), Turkey invaded the north of Cyprus, leading to the establishment of the internationally unrecognised Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

This did not affect the status of the bases. Greek Cypriots fleeing from the Turkish forces were permitted to travel through the Dhekelia Sovereign Base Area and were given humanitarian aid, with those from Achna setting up a new village (Dasaki Achnas or Achna Forest) which is still in the Dhekelia Sovereign Base Area.

The Turkish advance halted when it reached the edge of the Dhekelia Sovereign Base Area to avoid military conflict with the United Kingdom. In the Akrotiri Sovereign Base Area a tented refugee camp was set up at “Happy Valley” (part of the Episkopi Cantonment) to house Turkish Cypriots fleeing from Limassol and the villages surrounding the Area, until in 1975 they were flown out of RAF Akrotiri via Turkey to northern Cyprus.

Some Greek Cypriot refugees remain housed on land in the parts of Trachoni and Kolossi villages that fall within the Akrotiri Sovereign Base Area.

Criticism and disputes

In July 2001, protests were held at the bases by local Cypriots, angry at British plans to construct radio masts at the bases as part of an upgrade of British military communication posts around the world.

Locals claimed the masts would endanger local lives and cause cancer, as well as have a negative impact on wildlife in the area. The British and Cypriot governments jointly commissioned health research from the University of Bristol and the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Cyprus, and that research project reported in 2005 that there was no evidence of health problems being caused by electromagnetic fields from the antennas.

The Sovereign Base Areas Administration has carried out assessments and surveys into the effects on wildlife, which have fed into an “Akrotiri Peninsula Environmental Management Plan”, published in September 2012.

The United Kingdom has shown no intention of ceding the Base Areas in their entirety to Cypriot control, although it has offered to cede 117 square kilometres (45 sq mi) of farmland as part of the rejected Annan Plan for Cyprus.

As of 2010, around 3,000 troops of British Forces Cyprus are based at Akrotiri and Dhekelia. Ayios Nikolaos Station, in the ESBA, is an ELINT (electronic intelligence) listening station of the UKUSA Agreement intelligence network.

The election of left-wing Demetris Christofias as Cypriot president in February 2008 prompted concern in the United Kingdom. Christofias pledged to remove all foreign military forces from the island as part of a future settlement of the Cyprus dispute, calling the British presence on the island a “colonial bloodstain”.

On 29th August 2013, during the Syrian civil war, some Cypriot and British media sources speculated that long-range ballistic missiles, fired from Syria in retaliation for proposed British involvement in military intervention against the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad, could hit Cyprus, and could potentially deliver chemical weapons.

In some Cypriot media it was stated that the proposed interdiction of the Syrian civil war, utilising Akrotiri and Dhekelia, could recklessly endanger the Cypriot populations near to those bases.

Two days earlier, on 27th August 2013, Cypriot foreign minister Ioannis Kasoulides had moved to calm Cypriot concerns, saying that the British bases were unlikely to play a major part in any intervention.

Reviews

In January 2010, a newspaper article appeared in the British press claiming that as a result of budgetary constraints arising from the Great Recession, the British Ministry of Defence drew up controversial plans to withdraw the United Kingdom’s 3,000 strong garrison and end the use of Cyprus as a staging point for ground forces.

The Labour government under whom the proposal appeared was replaced by the first Cameron ministry and their defence review did not mention the issue.

On 15th December 2012 in a written statement to the lower house the Secretary of State for Defence of the UK government (Phillip Hammond) revealed the findings of a report on the SBA military bases following the completion of a review of their operations by Lord Ashcroft:

The Sovereign Base areas are in a region of geo-political importance and high priority for the United Kingdom’s long term national security interests … Our military personnel, United Kingdom civilians and locally employed personnel in the Sovereign Base Areas make a major contribution to the national security of the United Kingdom and will continue to do so in the future.

Governance

The SBAs were retained in 1960 to keep military bases in areas under British sovereignty, along with the rights retained to use other sites in what became the territory of the Republic.

That makes them different from the other remaining British Overseas Territories, except for the British Indian Ocean Territory which was similarly carved out of a former colony as a site for a military base, although in that case the base was to be used by the United States and the inhabitants (Chagossians) were all removed.

The basic philosophy of their administration was declared by the British government in Appendix O to the 1960 treaty with Cyprus, which provided that the British government intended:

Not to develop the Sovereign Base Areas for other than military purposes.

Not to set up and administer “colonies”.

Not to create customs posts or other frontier barriers between the Sovereign Base Areas and the Republic.

Not to set up or permit the establishment of civilian commercial or industrial enterprises except insofar as these are connected with military requirements, and not otherwise to impair the economic, commercial or industrial unity and life of the Island.

Not to establish commercial or civilian seaports or airports.

Not to allow new settlement of people in the Sovereign Base Areas other than for temporary purposes.

Not to expropriate private property within the Sovereign Base Areas except for military purposes on payment of fair compensation.

The ancient monuments and antiquity (in particular the site and remains of Kourion, the Sanctuary of Apollo Hylates near Kourion, the Stadium of Curium and the Church and remains of the Holy Monastery of St Nicholas of the Cats) will be administered and maintained by the Republic of Cyprus.

Licences for antiquity excavation will be issued by the Republic but will be subject to the consent of the authorities of the Sovereign Base Areas. Movable antiquities found in excavations or discovered will be the property of the Republic. According to the Ministry of Defence:
Because the SBAs are primarily required as military bases and not ordinary dependent territories, the Administration reports to the Ministry of Defence in London.

It has no formal connection with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office or the British High Commission in Nicosia, although there are close informal links with both offices on policy matters.

The territory is administered by an Administrator who is also the Commander of British Forces Cyprus (Air Vice-Marshal Mike Wigston).

The Administrator is officially appointed by the British monarch on the advice of the Ministry of Defence. The Administrator has all the executive and legislative authority of a governor of an overseas territory.

A Chief Officer is appointed, and is responsible to the Administrator for the day-to-day running of the civil government, with subordinate Area Officers responsible for the civil administration of the two areas.

No elections are held in the territory, although British citizens are normally entitled to vote in United Kingdom elections (as British Forces or overseas electors).

The areas have their own legal system, distinct from the United Kingdom and the Republic of Cyprus.

This consists of the laws of the Colony of Cyprus as at August 1960, amended as necessary. The laws of Akrotiri and Dhekelia are closely aligned with, and in some cases identical to, the laws operating within the Republic of Cyprus.

The Court of the Sovereign Base Areas is concerned with non-military offences committed by any person within Akrotiri and Dhekelia, and law and order is maintained by the Sovereign Base Areas Police, while offences involving British Forces Cyprus and military law are dealt with by the Cyprus Joint Police Unit.

Fire and Rescue services are provided by the Defence Fire and Risk Management Organisation through stations at Episkopi, Akrotiri, Dhekelia and Ayios Nikolayos.

The Defence Medical Services provide emergency ambulance cover based from medical centres in the main bases.

All emergency services are accessible from any telephone using the Europe-wide emergency number 112.

Geography

Akrotiri and Dhekelia cover 3% of the land area of Cyprus, a total of 254 km2 (98 sq mi) (split 123 km2 (47 sq mi) (48.5%) at Akrotiri and 131 km2 (51 sq mi) (51.5%) at Dhekelia). 60% of the land is privately owned as freeholds by Cypriot citizens; the other 40% is controlled by the Ministry of Defence as the Crown lease hold land.

In January 2014, an agreement between the Cypriot and UK governments was signed, ensuring that residents and property owners in the British Bases will enjoy equal rights for the development of property.

In addition to Akrotiri and Dhekelia, the Treaty of Establishment also provided for the continued use by the British Ministry of Defence and the British Armed Forces of certain facilities within the Republic of Cyprus, known as Retained Sites.

Akrotiri is located in the south of the island, near the city of Limassol (or Lemesos). Dhekelia is in the southeast, near Larnaca. Both areas include military bases, as well as farmland and some residential land. Akrotiri is surrounded by territory controlled by the Republic of Cyprus, but Dhekelia also borders on the United Nations (UN) buffer zone and the area controlled by the Turkish forces.

Ayia Napa lies to the east of Dhekelia. The villages of Xylotympou and Ormideia, also in the Republic of Cyprus, are enclaves surrounded by Dhekelia.

The Dhekelia Power Station, divided by a British road into two parts, also belongs to the Republic of Cyprus. The northern part is an enclave, like the two villages, whereas the southern part is located by the sea, and therefore not an enclave, though it has no territorial waters of its own.

Territorial waters of 3 nautical miles (5.556 km) are claimed, and the right according to the laws of the United Nations to extend the claim of up to 12 nautical miles (22.224 km) is reserved.

Wildlife and ecology

Cyprus is an important migration flyway for birds between Africa and Europe and millions of birds are killed yearly as they migrate over the island. To protect resident and migratory birds, BirdLife Cyprus and the RSPB survey areas of illegal trapping.

More than 150 species of birds, over half of conservation concern, have been trapped in nets, or on limesticks, and it is estimated that organised crime gangs earn over 15 million Euros yearly. The dead birds are sold to provide the main ingredient for ambelopoulia in the Republic of Cyprus; an illegal delicacy served to restaurant diners.

The 2015 survey estimated a maximum 19 km (12 mi) of mist nets across both the Republic and the British Territories, and more than 5,300 limesticks removed, mainly in the Republic. It is estimated that over 2 million birds were killed in 2015 including over 800,000 on British Territories.

The beaches in the British Sovereign Base Areas (SBAs) are important nesting sites for the endangered green Chelonia mydas and loggerhead Caretta caretta turtles.

The SBA Environment Department, assisted by a large volunteer effort, has monitored turtle nesting success on SBA beaches since 1990. Disturbance to nesting turtles is an issue in some areas due to activities such as camping, driving on beaches and illegal fishing. Sea turtles in Cyprus are protected as priority species under the Protection and Management of Nature and Wildlife Ordinance (implementing the provisions of the Habitats Directive), enacted in 2007.

In December 2015, 5 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) were designated in the Cyprus Sovereign Base Areas. The five SACs designated are Akrotiri, Episkopi, Cape Pyla, Dhekelia and Agios Nikolaos.

The designations were made under the Protection and Management of Nature and Wildlife Ordinance and will support the existing network (NATURA 2000) of SACs in Cyprus and across Europe.

Languages of Cyprus

When the areas were being established, the boundaries were deliberately drawn to avoid centres of population. Approximately 15,700 people live in the areas. About 7,700 native Cypriots work in the areas themselves, or on farmland within the boundaries of the areas. The British military and their families make up the rest of the population.

Persons related to the territory may in theory be eligible to claim the British Overseas Territories citizenship (BOTC status) through a personal connection to the areas (i.e., birth on the territory before 1983, or born after 1983 to a parent who were born on the territory before 1983); but unlike most other British Overseas Territories, there is no provision in the 2002 amendment of the British Nationality Act 1981 by which British citizenship (with the right of abode in the United Kingdom) can either be claimed through automatic entitlement or be applied for by means of registration, from or through a sole personal connection to the Base Areas.

(In comparison, the 2002 act bestowed British citizenship on all other BOTCs.) Hence non-British and non-military personnel with the connection to the territory can only live and work in the UK through their EU (Cypriot) citizenship and not through their BOTC status.

Under the terms of the 1960 agreement with Cyprus establishing the Sovereign Base Areas, the United Kingdom is committed not to use the areas for civilian purposes. This was stated in 2002 as the primary reason for the exclusion of the areas from the scope of the British Overseas Territories Act 2002.?

Economy

There are no economic statistics gathered for Akrotiri and Dhekelia. The main economic activities are the provision of services to the military, as well as limited agriculture.

When the territory under the effective control of the Republic of Cyprus switched currencies from the Cypriot pound to the euro on 1st January 2008, Akrotiri and Dhekelia followed suit making the Sovereign Base Areas the only territory under British sovereignty to officially use the euro.

Media

BFBS Radio 1 and 2 are broadcast on FM and can be widely received across Cyprus.

BFBS Television is now only available to entitled viewers via satellite, having been confined to the SBAs or encrypted in 1997 for copyright reasons, before BFBS switched off its analogue transmitters in 2009.

The British East Mediterranean Relay Station is situated locally.

Communications

The Base Areas form part of the Republic of Cyprus telephone numbering plan, using the international prefix +357. Landline numbers are in the same eight-digit format, with the last four digits being the extension number. Numbers in Dhekelia begin with the digits 2474, while those in Akrotiri begin with the digits 2527.

Postal services are provided by the British Forces Post Office, with mail to Akrotiri being addressed to BFPO 57 and mail to Dhekelia and Ayios Nikolaos being addressed to BFPO 58.

The bases are issued different amateur radio call signs from the Republic of Cyprus. Amateur radio stations on the bases use the International Telecommunication Union prefix of “ZC4”, which is assigned to Great Britain.
There are about 52 amateurs licensed in this manner.

Amateur radio direction finding identified RAF Akrotiri as the location of the powerful but now defunct shortwave numbers station “Lincolnshire Poacher”. Several curtain antennas there have been identified as being used for these transmissions.

Education

Service Children’s Education oversees education for children of personnel and MoD employees. The Eastern Sovereign Base Area is served by Dhekelia Primary School and Ayios Nikolaos Primary School, which are feeders for King Richard School. The Western Sovereign Base Area is served by Episkopi Primary School and Akrotiri Primary School, which are feeders for St. John’s School.

Travel to Northern Cyprus

A passport is required to travel between Cyprus/SBAs and Northern Cyprus. Issues concerning the validity of car insurance and customs are specified by SBAs’ administration.

SCANDAL

On the 16th of September 1994, three members of the 1st Battalion The Royal Green Jackets brought total disgrace to the Regiment in Ayia Nanpa, Cyprus, all three were involved in the rape and murder of a Danish tour guide.

Full report below…..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Louise_Jensen

https://www.thefreelibrary.com/%60The+spade+hit+her+again+and+again..I+couldn’t+get+my+eyes+to+look…-a061325411

Photo by CIA – CIA World Factbook https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/dx.html, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=356353

Sourced from Wikipedia 

 

“Falling Plates”

 Articles  Comments Off on “Falling Plates”
Apr 032017
 

“Falling Plates”

This name has dogged The Royal Green Jackets from the Early 1970`s.

The term falling plates is used within the military as a target but also it is widely known as a derogatory name for an easy target or loss of life.

It was first used in Northern Ireland during “The Troubles” in the early 70`s when the Green Howards Regiment suffered a significant number of loss of good men.

This name was also passed onto The Royal Green Jackets in the early 70`s as they too suffered loss of men, the RGJ have made numerous tours of the province throughout the troubles, and this name as dogged the regiment from there on.

Many fights would break out within the army if ever you used the term “Falling Plates” within earshot of the RGJ, on one occasion the term “Falling Plates” made national press, after the RGJ lost a soldier in Balleek, Armagh, when the RGJ came back to Drummadd Barracks, in Armagh City, they found paper plates hanging in the cookhouse with the words another “Falling Plates” put there by the Royal Marines, and also, other despicable things to upsetting mention, this caused fights inside and outside the Barracks, we are told that a marine was hospitalised during the events that took place after the cookhouse issue.

chfallingA former Rifleman alerted the men and the Winchester press to the situation, where upon a Facebook Group was formed, this became a worldwide issue, a total insult to every Rifleman. This one officer calling the cafe “Falling Plates” had brought the whole regiment into disrepute, letters of protest where sent and untold emails by former Riflemen to the Regimental HQ in Peninsula Barracks, where one senior officer, John Poole-Warren, replied in the local news paper, that he did not see a problem with the name.

The biggest shock to this fine regiment was for a high ranking officer to call a cafe in the old guard room of the Royal Green Jackets ancestral home, Peninsula Barracks, “Falling Plates,” this was an insult to the men, it seems no respect or consideration was given to the men or the regiment when naming it. I wonder if Sir John Moore would have allowed this to happen, after all the Royal Green Jackets are taught mutual respect between Officers and Men, as passed down by Sir John Moore.

The local MP Steve Brine was also alerted to the situation by a fellow Rifleman, the protests went on for over a year until the RGJRA and the cafe owner changed the name of the cafe to “Cafe Peninsula” ( The owner of the cafe who was in no way to blame for this as she would not have known the background history to the term ” Falling Plates“) but the Officer and others who gave it the go ahead would have.

An acclaimed Rifleman, who had been awarded the Military Medal, for his contribution to anti terrorism measures in a hearts and minds offensive whilst serving in the Northern Ireland province, had also stood firm with the Officer, whose statement had compounded the issue, (some would say an act of mutiny, in that the Officer had jumped ship, putting money before his men and that of the respect of his men, his Regiment and the Army, flying in the face of everything the ethos that had been bestowed by the great man himself, none other than Sir John Moore) he too could see no problem with the name. He had been awarded the The Military Medal for shooting Jim Bryson and Patrick Mulvenna, Bryson being a key player in the freedom Army, the IRA. He was Gazetted for his bravery award on the 18th of June 1974.

This whole episode had made us as a Regiment re-evaluate its strengths and weaknesses, some would say a very fine weeding, it made a them and us scenario, and bought into the arena, a situation of, “One Mans’ Army is another Man’s’ freedom fighter… the question that now arises is and as controversial as it might seem, “What’s it all about, is it correct in the light of the signing of the peace treaty to award the Soldier who was gazetted, for the killing of Bryson, when it is ok for an Officer to see no problem in calling an ex Military guardroom and jail, by a derogatory term which was used to belittle those serving the Sovereign, when used as a cafe. The ironic thing, was this Officer able to see in to the future, a fortune teller, after all some years down the line the very person that these chaps was serving was inviting into her Palace a terrorist activist of a freedom Army, inviting by the shake of a hand and sitting down to tea… the rest is in the making the brewing we will have to see it unfold.

The Cafe was renamed to Cafe Peninsula, the cafe has since been taken over and is now called

(Gorgeous handmade food for all occasions)

07522927567

This is the link and story run by the Hampshire Chronicle news story about, “Falling Plates”

http://www.hampshirechronicle.co.uk/news/8217217.Caf___name_is_a_slur_on_regiment__say_veterans/

14th June 2010
Café name is a slur on regiment, say veterans
Chris Harris

ARMED Forces veterans have slammed a new Winchester café saying its name is an insult to their fallen comrades.

They are angry the Falling Plates Café has opened its doors at their historic regimental home, calling it a “slap in the face” and “an insult to the memory of the dead”.

The former Royal Green Jackets (RGJ) soldiers say Falling Plates is a derogatory nickname for heavy casualties suffered in Northern Ireland, Iraq and Afghanistan.

The ex-soldiers say the term — which refers to the stationary targets at a shooting range — is disrespectful to those who have given their lives for their country.

A 221-strong Facebook group is demanding the café, at Peninsula Barracks, changes its name before up to 3,000 ex-Green Jackets flood into the city for a reunion on July 10.

Winchester-based Sean Wheeler, who served with RGJ, now The Rifles, from 1989-95, said: “They (RGJ veterans) are very angry about it, the nickname has caused a lot of fights in the past.

“I don’t think we’re being oversensitive — it’s disrespectful to the Green Jackets.”

The 38-year-old, of Romsey Road, added: “They lost men and it’s disrespectful to their families.

“She’s a German lady (the owner) and she put the café’s name through the museum.

“I’d have thought the people in the museum would have a bit more sense than to okay this.”

Tony Cotton, 47, who served with RGJ from 1983-89, said: “I don’t know whether it’s a big mistake or a provocation.”
Steve Barrett, who toured Northern Ireland with the regiment in the 1970s, said: “I’ve seen so many fights about this nickname.

To have this put on our old barracks is like a slap in the face.”

But Lt Col John Poole-Warren, chairman of the Royal Green Jackets Association, denied it was a derogatory term and said it was named after a military shooting competition.

“The name was chosen by an ex regimental sergeant-major who works in the RGJ museum in Winchester,” he said.

“I don’t think there’s any reason for the name to be changed.”

Annette Bergen, café owner, said: “I did not mean to cause any offence, I chose the name in good faith and I chose it after running it past people at the museum.

“If I had known it was controversial I would not have chosen it.

“In the foreseeable future I have no intention of changing the name, we have had many positive comments and only two that have been negative.”

Miss Bergen, originally from Germany, opened the café in April.

It came less than a year after she co-founded Leaf & Bean in Fulflood with Daniel Mills.

But she struck out on her own after deciding that business was not big enough for two.

Comments below.

People of Winchester please read this, the Officer and RSM would have known about this one incident years ago and this made National press at the time.We are not about shutting the cafe just a name change. If you go onto our site you can read more comments and new names for Annette this was post on the site for a ex RGJ. I can remember clearly one incident where the use of the slagging term ” falling plates” was clearly directed to 1rgj in fermanagh in 1987, when on the first day of his arrival l/cpl tom hewitt on patrol in advanced party taking over from marines was shot in the head from across the border in beleek by an ira sniper.Later that evening when 1rgj visited the naafi,the marines had placed a figure 11 target up and written on it ,green jackets take it in the head,falling plates.There was lots of fighting between these units and serious injuries inflicted upon some,the trouble lasted days and progressed as the rest of the company arrived,this incident made the national newspapers and was the reason why helmets then become worn as compulsory,this still lingers and is hurtful in my memory ,other comrades memories who remember,this alone to me justify s enough reason why the cafe called by this name should be renamed,. i cannot believe there is such a cafe with this name in such a place,what a travesty to the memories of the fallen heroes,i am totally disgusted and can only say ,something should be done to rectify this ,any genuine ex green jacket knows his history and would have some knowledge of this term being used in memory,so if a comrade in arms of the same rgj has no knowledge of this,i can only assume he has been locked away in the cupboard under the stairs for many years. To a green jacket it would be like calling the sky green,now lets rally around this boys and have our voices heard in memory of those who are now unable to speak.

Hi Steve, As you know the origin of falling plates, you could explain it to the press, as far as the stigma that has been placed not only on us, the Royal Green jackets, but Green Howards, in the early 70s in Northern Ireland the Gre…en Howards lost a few good soldiers trying to keep the peace out there, it was a diffi…cult job to do at the best of times, but other members of the Armed Forces thought it was funny thus giving them the name, ” Falling Plates “, which to me is an insult to the memory of those who lost their lives out there. regards John

This is from Tony cotton shown on our site. Annette, i hope you read this,we no you didn’t mean to upset anyone,it was a mistake,the powers that be are more to blame for telling you it was ok.
change the name and u’ll make a whole regiment of friends and i am sure we’ll invite you to our reunion.you can see how the blokes are upset.you can make the guys happy,you hold… the key.we do understand its hassel for you but it’ll be worth it .its not just a storm in a teacup.

Dear Annette, can I ask you please to rethink the name of the cafe, it’s only a name but the one you have chosen is making so many people unhappy. I’m sure you can find a compromise that will suit everyone.

I have had a long hard think about this one not only is it disrespectful to name anything military this. (regardless weather their green jackets or Green Howards they are all fallen hero brothers) it just goes to show what the bureaucratic people really think of the soldiers past and present. (DEAD OR ALIVE).

From Gary Best …. They obviously have no respect for those who are brave enough to step up to the mark and lay their lives on the line for their country.

Thought I’d heard the last of that saying in the 70’s. Tony Mayers.

Philp Morrison on our group pages…. The comment was also used in s amagh in 1981 where 1 rgj lost 5 in a bombing and deano in a shooting rip guys !!!!!!!!.

This Comment was left on our group site by NoHandsignals….. It goes back a long way, it was a bad nick name given to the all the RGJ for the amount of fellow rifleman killed in NI. The regiments that called us this name where the ones that had only one battalion and did NI tours once every couple of years. We had Battalions serving in NI from 1969 to 92. When we became The Rifles,:Please support our cause!!!!!.

This Comment was left on our Face Book site by Bob Ross…. I have just read Lt.Col.John Poole-Warrens comment in the Hampshire Chronicle saying he did not think that ‘Falling plates’ was derogatory.It just shows how out of touch he is with the feelings of Riflemen,and he is meant to be the Chairman of our association.Wake up man!.

This Comment by Len Readle left on our Face Book Site; Typical Diplomatic ****
If he or the other turds there can’t see it, then they aint true Black n Greens
This was the standard attempted insult thrown at us so many times back in the day, caused many a punch up.
I think in this day and age a visit will not work, a letter referring her to the posts here, but better, a letter explaining the support against this name, then the news paper, if not.. well then early July it is.

2 RGJ Recce
I can’t believe that this has got to go as far as it has, the Regimental Museum should know better, anyone who says that they believed it as not being a derogatory term are either lying or completely out of touch with The Royal Green Jackets, EVERY ex Green Jacket I know sees this name as an insult, it’s time something was done before the reunion in July because quite frankly I can see trouble coming.

The cafe would have been a natural magnet to all ex members of the regiment revisiting Winchester myself included and it will still be but for all the wrong reasons now.
A little commonsense should have been applied and a more suitable name chosen given the buildings history, a name such as “The old Guardroom Cafe” “The Green Jacket Cafe” “The Peninsula Cafe” or even a little more obscure “The Imber Clump” any of these would have been better than “The Falling Plates”.
I originally trained in Winchester in 1972 and returned there in 1980 where I spent another 6 very happy years, I still think of Winchester as my second home and it saddens me to see that commonsense has not been applied when naming this cafe, as Green Jackets we are normally much better than this.

Kevin Stevens Oxford.

This Comment from Paul Axtell …..Most Ruperts tend to live in a bubble so that they forget the feelings of others. Its when it explodes in there faces that they wonder what all the fuss is about. I echo Bob “Wake up that man” listen to the those Sjt’s who use to wisper in your ear “no sir not like that,like this”–” look after your men and they will look after you
Call it the ‘Guard room’ after all thats what it was!!!!!!!!!!!!
Swift & Bold.

This Comment by Martin Wyness on our Group Site ……. well on the 71-73 2RGJ tour in Derry I first heard this nickname but then it was the Anglians or the Green Howards who lost a couple of lads in the little diamond.Heard it again in the 90s when an ex-engineer said it to me about the RGJ needless to say he didnt get the chance to say anything else!.

This Comment by Michael Allan Elliott ……This rupert is too busy drinking pimms to give a **** about the blokes !!!!!.

This Comment by Sean Wheeler……Gents this ex officer has said that this is not directed towards the men and regiments of the ROYAL GREEN JACKETS but toward china plates.THEN WHY and i REPEAT WHY does it also say on the advertising boards SWIFT service and BOLD flavours AND a drawing of A BAKER RIFLE i rest my case !!!!!!!!!!.

Sourced from the Hampshire Chronicle.

Sourced from Google

Indian Army during World War II

 Articles  Comments Off on Indian Army during World War II
Apr 022017
 

Indian Army during World War II

The Indian Army during World War II began the war, in 1939, numbering just under 200,000 men.

By the end of the war, it had become the largest volunteer army in history, rising to over 2.5 million men in August 1945.

Serving in divisions of infantry, armour and a fledgling airborne force, they fought on three continents in Africa, Europe and Asia.

The Indian Army fought in Ethiopia against the Italian Army, in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia against both the Italian and German Army, and, after the Italian surrender, against the German Army in Italy.

However, the bulk of the Indian Army was committed to fighting the Japanese Army, first during the British defeats in Malaya and the retreat from Burma to the Indian border; later, after resting and refitting for the victorious advance back into Burma, as part of the largest British Empire army ever formed.

These campaigns cost the lives of over 87,000 Indian servicemen, while another 34,354 were wounded, and 67,340 became prisoners of war.

Their valour was recognised with the award of some 4,000 decorations, and 18 members of the Indian Army were awarded the Victoria Cross or the George Cross.

Field Marshal Claude Auchinleck, Commander-in-Chief of the Indian Army from 1942, asserted that the British “couldn’t have come through both wars (World War I and II) if they hadn’t had the Indian Army.”

British Prime Minister Winston Churchill also paid tribute to “The unsurpassed bravery of Indian soldiers and officers.”

Background

In 1939, the Indian Army was an experienced force, having fought in the Third Afghan War, two major campaigns in Waziristan, during 1919–1920 and 1936–1939, and in several smaller disputes on the North West Frontier since the First World War.

There was no shortage of manpower to call upon, but the army did suffer from a shortage of skilled technical personnel.

The conversion of the cavalry force into a mechanised tank force had only just begun and was hampered by the inability to supply adequate numbers of tanks and armoured vehicles.

In 1939, British officials had no plan for expansion and training of Indian forces, which comprised about 130,000 men (in addition, there were 44,000 men in British units in India in 1939).

Their mission was internal security and defence against a possible Russian threat through Afghanistan. As the war progressed, the size and role of the Indian Army expanded dramatically, and troops were sent to battle fronts as soon as possible. The most serious problem was lack of equipment.

Organization

List of Indian Army Brigades in World War II and List of regiments of the Indian Army (1922)

The Indian Army of 1939 was different from the Indian Army during World War I, it had been reformed in 1922, moving away from single battalion regiments to multi-battalion regiments.

Overall, the army was reduced to 21 cavalry regiments and 107 infantry battalions.

The field army now consisted of four infantry divisions and five cavalry brigades.

There was a covering force of 12 infantry brigades to protect the North West Frontier from incursions and one third of the infantry, 43 battalions, were allocated to internal security and to aid the civil power.

In the 1930s, the Indian Army began a programme of modernisation—they now had their own artillery—the Indian Artillery Regiment—and the cavalry had started to mechanise.

By 1936, the Indian Army had committed to supplying in wartime a brigade each for Singapore, the Persian Gulf, the Red Sea, Burma and two for Egypt.

But, by 1939, further reductions had reduced the Indian Army to 18 cavalry regiments and 96 infantry battalions, in total 194,373 men including 34,155 non-combatants.

They could also call upon 15,000 men from the Frontier Irregular Force, 22,000 men from the Auxiliary Force (India), consisting of European and Anglo-Indian volunteers, 19,000 from the Indian Territorial Force, and 53,000 from the Indian State forces.

There were twenty two regular regiments of cavalry, which supplied armoured and armoured car units. (Seven more were raised during the war.)

There were twenty regular Indian regiments of infantry (including the Burma Rifles) and ten Gurkha regiments. Before the war, all the Indian regiments had at least two battalions, and most had more.

The Gurkha regiments had two battalions each. During the war, the Gurkha regiments raised a further two battalions each, while the Indian regiments raised up to fifteen each.

Two further regiments (the Assam Regiment and the Burma Regiment) were created during the war.

The Indian Army started World War II underprepared and short of modern weapons and equipment.

It had not expected to be involved in any hostilities and had been advised after the outbreak of war in Europe, by the British government, that it was unlikely to be required at all.

So, it was with some surprise when the 4th Infantry and 5th Infantry divisions were requested to serve in the North African and East African Campaigns and four mule companies to join the British Expeditionary Force in France.

1940

In May 1940, agreement was reached between the British and Indian governments over the formation of another five infantry and one armoured divisions, which became the 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th infantry and the 31st Indian Armoured Divisions.

These new divisions were primarily intended to be used in the defence of Malaya (9th Division) and Iraq (6th, 8th and 10th Infantry divisions).

The 3rd Indian Motor Brigade, from the armoured division, was to go to Egypt; the formation of the rest of the armoured division was put on hold, because of the shortage of armoured vehicles.

1941

In March 1941, the Indian government revised the defence plan for India. Concerned with what the Japanese were planning and the requirement to replace the divisions sent overseas, seven new armoured regiments and 50 new infantry battalions were needed for five new infantry divisions that were formed: the 14th, 17th, 19th, 20th, 34th and the two armoured formations 32nd Indian Armoured Division and 50th Indian Tank Brigade.

1942

With the fall of Singapore in 1942, about 40,000 Indian soldiers were captured. They were given a choice; 30,000 joined the Indian National Army. Those who refused became POWs and were mostly shipped to New Guinea.

With the previously formed divisions mostly committed overseas in 1942, the army formed another four infantry divisions (23rd, 25th, 28th, 36th) and the 43rd Indian Armoured Division.

However, events during 1942 and the Japanese conquests meant that the 28th Division was not formed and the units earmarked for it were used elsewhere. The 36th Division uniquely, was created as a British Indian Army formation, but was formed from British brigades that had reached India from the Madagascar campaign and from Britain.

The final division formed in 1942 was the 26th Indian Infantry Division, which was hastily formed from the various units in training or stationed near Calcutta.

After the perceived poor performance in battles in Malaya and Burma in 1942, it was decided that the existing infantry divisions were over–mechanised. To counter this, the 17th and 39th divisions were selected to become light divisions, of only two brigades which would rely more on animal and four-wheel-drive transport.

By December 1942, agreement was reached that India should become the base for offensive operations. Support should be in place for 34 divisions, which would include two British, one West African, one East African and eleven Indian divisions, and what was left of the Burma Army.

1943

The plans for 1943 included the formation of another infantry division, an airborne division and a heavy armoured brigade.

Only the 44th Indian Armoured Division was formed, by amalgamating the 32nd and 43rd Armoured divisions. There was a change to the establishment of infantry divisions, which received two extra infantry battalions as divisional troops.

A committee was set up in 1943 to report on the readiness of the army and suggest improvements. Its recommendations were:

The infantry should have first claims on cadet officers and educated recruits, the quality of officers and non commissioned officers (NCO) should be improved and there should be an increase in pay.

Basic training should be increased to nine months followed by two months’ specialised jungle training.
The reinforcement system should be improved and drafts should include experienced NCO’s
Infantry brigades should include a British, an Indian and a Gurkha battalion.

To assist in the jungle training of the infantry from July 1943, the 14th and 39th divisions were converted to training divisions.

The 116th Indian Infantry Brigade, part of 39th Division, provided the specialised jungle conversion training. An infantry battalion would spend from four to six months with the brigade, before being sent to the front to replace a tired battalion in one of the fighting divisions.

The brigades and units of the 14th Division provided jungle training for drafts of reinforcements for the Indian battalions already serving on the Burma front.

1944

The planned 44th Indian Airborne Division was finally formed from the 44th Armoured Division, leaving the 31st Armoured as the only armoured division in the army.

The infantry division formation was changed again; it was now standardised as three infantry brigades plus three infantry battalions assigned as divisional troops.

The success of the 116th Brigade in training for jungle warfare was recognised. From May 1944, 116th Brigade trained units destined for the Fourteenth Army and 150th Brigade, which was converted from the Risalpur Training Brigade, trained units destined for the Southern Army.

The 155th Indian Infantry Brigade was formed to provide training for units destined for the western theatres of war.

Infantry divisions

Infantry divisions consisted of three infantry brigades, of three infantry battalions. Usually, one battalion in each brigade was British and two were Indian or Gurkha.

Four brigades were raised consisting entirely of Gurkha battalions. Later in the war, as British infantry reinforcements became more scarce, particularly in the South East Asian Theatre, British battalions in brigades fighting in Burma were replaced by Indian units.

In a division with a standard MT (Mechanical Transport) establishment, the divisional units were a reconnaissance unit provided by a mechanised cavalry regiment, and a heavy machine gun battalion armed with thirty-six Vickers machine guns. (Each regiment of the Indian Army raised a machine gun battalion in addition to its infantry battalions.)

The divisional artillery consisted of three field artillery regiments with twenty-four 25-pounder guns each, one anti-tank regiment with forty-eight anti-tank guns and one light anti-aircraft regiment with up to fifty-four light anti-aircraft guns. There were three engineer field companies and one engineer field park company, plus signals, medical and transport units.

There were variations on the infantry formation, depending on role. The light divisions (14th, 17th and 39th) as formed in 1942 had only two brigades and lacked much heavy equipment. Transport was provided by six mule and four Jeep companies.

This type of division was later dropped. The Animal and Mechanised transport divisions (A & MT) (7th, 20th and 23rd and later the 5th) had a mixture of animal and vehicle transport, as the name suggests.

In particular, one of the vehicle-drawn field artillery regiments was replaced by a mountain artillery regiment with twelve 3.7-inch howitzers, carried on mules. The anti-tank and light anti-aircraft regiments were replaced by a single regiment, with two batteries each of anti-tank and anti-aircraft guns.

The divisional reconnaissance unit was replaced by a lightly equipped infantry battalion. Another standard infantry battalion provided the HQ Defence unit.

On 27th May 1944, General George Giffard (the commander of 11th Army Group) ordered that all Indian divisions fighting in Burma should adopt the A & MT establishment.

Late that year, however, Lieutenant General William Slim (commanding Fourteenth Army) converted two divisions (the 5th and 17th) to a mixed establishment of two motorised brigades and one airportable brigade, in anticipation of mechanised operations in the comparatively open terrain of central Burma.

In April 1945, the 20th Division was also converted to a partially motorised establishment by acquiring the vehicles from a British division whose personnel were being withdrawn from Burma.

Armoured divisions

It was intended to form an armoured division in the plans for 1940, 1941 and 1942. However, the Indian armoured formations suffered from a lack of equipment.

The shortage of tanks in 1940 was reflected in the organisation of 31st Armoured Division, which first had one armoured and two motor brigades. At the end of 1940, this was changed to two armoured and one motor brigade.

When the 3rd Indian Motor Brigade was sent to Egypt, the British armoured division organisation of two armoured brigades and a Support group was adopted.

In June 1942, the division’s establishment was fixed as one armoured and one infantry brigade. The surplus armoured brigades (50th, 254th, 255th and the 267th) became independent brigades and served in the Burma campaign.

In March 1943, the shortage of technical staff forced another review of the armoured force and the 32nd and 43rd armoured divisions were amalgamated to become the 44th Indian Armoured Division.

In March 1944, a further review reduced the armoured force to one division (the 31st Armoured Division serving in the Middle East) and three tank brigades (the 50th, 254th and 255th) serving in Burma.

Airborne troops

The 50th Independent Indian Parachute Brigade was formed on 29 October 1941, with the British 151st Parachute Battalion, 152nd Indian Parachute Battalion and 153rd Gurkha Parachute Battalion, a medium machine gun company and a medium mortar detachment.

The 151st Battalion was later renumbered as the 156th Battalion and returned to Britain and another Gurkha battalion (154th) was formed, but had not joined the brigade when it was heavily involved in the Battle of Sangshak in March 1944.

The headquarters of the 44th Indian Armoured Division was converted in April 1944, to 9th Indian Airborne Division, which was renamed the 44th Airborne Division a few weeks later.

After a delay caused by the Japanese invasion of India, the division resumed forming in July. It absorbed the 50th Parachute Brigade, and later two brigades from the disbanding Chindit force.

The division now consisted of the 50th, 77th Parachute Brigades and 14th Airlanding Brigade, two field artillery regiments, two anti-aircraft regiments and a joint anti-aircraft and anti-tank regiment.

Artillery

The Royal Artillery still provided some of the artillery required for Indian Army formations, but the Indian Regiment of Artillery had been formed in 1935, initially consisting of four horse–drawn batteries.

The regiment was expanded during the war and, by 1945, had formed 10 field artillery regiments, 13 mountain artillery regiments, 10 anti–tank artillery regiments.

Three anti–aircraft brigades were formed from the four heavy anti–aircraft artillery regiments and five light anti–aircraft artillery regiments created.

For the regiments service during the war, it was granted the title Royal Indian Artillery in 1945.

Engineers

The Indian Engineers were a part of every division in the army. The engineers corps started the war with two army troops companies, 11 Field Companies and one field park company.

Expansion during the war took the totals of engineers to; five army troops companies, 67 Field companies, six independent field squadrons, 20 field park companies and two independent field park squadrons.

Women’s Auxiliary Corps

The Women’s Auxiliary Corps was formed in May 1942; recruits had to be a minimum age of 18 years and their duties were clerical or domestic.

In December 1942, the minimum age was reduced to 17 years and 11,500 women had enlisted by the end of the war.

Volunteers could enlist on Local service or General service terms. Those on General service could be sent to serve anywhere in India.

Compared to over two million men, a corps of 11,500 women does not seem many, but recruitment was always hampered by caste and communal inhibitions. Indian women at the time did not mix socially or at work with men and a large part of the corps was formed from the Anglo–Asian community.

Indian States Forces

Further information: List of Indian princely states and Imperial Service Troops
The Indian States or Princely states provided 250,000 men during the war.

They contributed five cavalry regiments and 36 infantry battalions, and between them had 16 infantry battalions plus signal, transport and pioneers companies on active service.

One of their men, Captain Mahmood Khan Durrani, was awarded the George Cross while in Japanese captivity.

Chindits

Chindits and Order of Battle of the Chindits

The Chindits (named after a mythical beast, statues of which guarded Burmese temples) were the brainchild of Brigadier Orde Wingate, who intended that long-range penetration raids behind enemy lines would become the main effort against the Japanese in Burma.

In 1943, he mounted Operation Longcloth by the 77th Indian Infantry Brigade. In 1944, they staged a much larger operation which involved disbanding the 70th British Infantry Division, Its three brigades together with three more brigades were grouped as Special Force and referred to for cover purposes as 3rd Indian Infantry Division.

Chindits were in fact ordinary infantry units arbitrarily selected for the mission on the basis of their availability. There was no commando, airborne or other selection procedure, although there was some “weeding out” of less fit personnel during training for operations.

The Chindits were disbanded in February 1945.

Several of the brigade headquarters and many of the veterans of the Chindit operations were reformed and merged into 44th Airborne Division, while the force headquarters and signals units formed the core of XXXIV Indian Corps.

Armies
The Indian Army supplied formations for the following Allied armies:

Eighth

The Eighth Army was formed from the Western Desert Force in September 1941,[43] under the command of Lieutenant General Sir Alan Cunningham.

Over time, the Eighth Army would be commanded by Generals Neil Ritchie, Claude Auchinleck and Bernard Montgomery.

In the early years of the war, the Eighth Army suffered from poor leadership and repeated reversals of fortune until the Second Battle of El Alamein when it advanced across Libya into Tunisia.

Ninth

The Ninth Army was formed on 1 November 1941 with the re designation of the Headquarters of the British Troops in Mandate Palestine and Transjordan.

It controlled British and Commonwealth land forces stationed in the eastern Mediterranean. Its commanders were General Sir Henry Maitland Wilson and Lieutenant-General Sir William George Holmes.

Tenth

The Tenth Army was formed in Iraq and from the major part of Paiforce after the Anglo-Iraqi War. It was active in 1942–1943, under the command of Lieutenant-General Sir Edward Quinan, and consisted of the III Corps and the XXI Indian Corps.

Its main task was the maintenance of the lines of communication to the Soviet Union from the Persian Gulf to the Caspian and the protection of the South Persian and Iraqi oilfields that supplied Britain with all its non American sourced oil.

Twelfth

The Twelfth Army was reformed in May 1945, to take control of operations in Burma from the Fourteenth Army. The army Headquarters was created by re designating the Headquarters of the XXXIII Indian Corps, under Lieutenant-General Sir Montagu Stopford.

Fourteenth
The Fourteenth Army was a multinational force comprising units from Commonwealth countries, many of its units were from the Indian Army as well as British units and there were also significant contributions from 81st, 82nd and 11th African divisions.

It was often referred to as the “Forgotten Army” because its operations in the Burma Campaign were overlooked by the contemporary press, and remained more obscure than those of the corresponding formations in Europe for long after the war.

It was formed in 1943, under the command of Lieutenant General William Slim. The Fourteenth Army was the largest Commonwealth Army during the war, with nearly a million men by late 1944.

At various times, four corps were assigned to the army: IV Corps, XV Indian Corps, XXXIII Indian Corps and the XXXIV Indian Corps.

Southern

The Southern Army was formed from Southern Command in 1942, and disbanded in August 1945. Mostly a British formation used on internal security and for units out of the front line. The 19th Indian Infantry Division was one of its units from 1942 to 1944.

North Western

The North Western Army was formed from North Western Command in April 1942, formed to guard the North West Frontier it controlled the Kohat, Peshawar, Rawalpindi, Baluchistan and Waziristan Districts.

Middle East and Africa

North Africa

North African Campaign, Western Desert Campaign, and Tunisia Campaign

Just before the declaration of war, one Indian infantry brigade was sent to reinforce the British garrison in Egypt. In October 1939, a second brigade was sent; they were grouped together as the 4th Indian Infantry Division.

By March 1940, two additional brigades and a divisional headquarters had been sent to Egypt; these became the 5th Indian Infantry Division.

Operation Compass (4th Indian and 7th Armoured Division) was the first major Allied military operation of the Western Desert Campaign during the Second World War.

It resulted in British and Commonwealth forces pushing across a great stretch of Libya and capturing almost all of Cyrenaica, 115,000 Italian soldiers, hundreds of tanks and artillery pieces and more than 1,100 aircraft with very few casualties of their own.

The Allies’ success against the Italians forced the Germans to reinforce North Africa. The Afrika Corps commanded by Erwin Rommel attacked in March 1941.

The 3rd Indian Motor Brigade, fought a delaying battle at Meikili on 6 April, which allowed the 9th Australian Division to safely withdraw to Tobruk.

Operation Battleaxe (4th Indian and 7th Armoured) in June 1941 had the goal of clearing eastern Cyrenaica of German and Italian forces; one of the main benefits of this would be the lifting of the Siege of Tobruk.

The operation did not succeed losing over half of their tanks on the first day and only achieved victory at one out of three thrusts. On the second day, they achieved mixed results, being pushed back on their western flank but repelled a significant German counter-attack in their centre.

On the third day, the British narrowly avoided outright disaster by successfully withdrawing just prior to a German encircling movement which would have cut them off from retreat.

Operation Crusader (4th Indian, 7th Armoured, 1st South African, 2nd New Zealand and 70th British divisions) between 18th November–30th December 1941.

The initial plan was to destroy the Axis armoured force before advancing its infantry. 7th Armoured were heavily defeated by the Afrika Korps at Sidi Rezegh.

Rommel’s subsequent advance of his armoured divisions to the Axis fortress positions on the Egyptian border failed to find the main body of the Allied infantry, which had bypassed the fortresses and headed for Tobruk, so Rommel had to withdraw his armoured units to support the fighting at Tobruk.

Despite achieving some tactical successes at Tobruk, the need to preserve his remaining forces prompted Rommel to withdraw his army to the defensive line at Gazala, west of Tobruk, and then all the way back to El Agheila.

4th Division left the desert for Cyprus and Syria in April 1942.

By May 1942, their 11th Brigade had returned attached to the 5th Indian fighting south of Tobruk.

Their 5th Brigade returned in June 1942, and fought at Mersa Matruh.

The 10th Indian Infantry Division arrived from Syria, in time to take part in the Battle of Gazala May–June 1942, then held the Axis forces for 72 hours, in the First Battle of El Alamein permitting Eighth Army to safely withdraw.

HQ 4th Division returned for the Second Battle of El Alamein, holding Ruweisat Ridge at the centre of the Eighth Army’s line, made a mock attack and two small raids intended to deflect attention to the centre of the front.

Operation Pugilist (4th Indian, 2nd New Zealand and 50th Northumbrian divisions) was an operation in the Tunisian Campaign The object of was to destroy the Axis forces in the Mareth Line, and to capture Sfax.

Pugilist itself was indecisive and failed to make a decisive breakthrough. It did, however, establish an alternative route of attack and thus laid the ground for Supercharge II, an outflanking manoeuvre via the Tebaga Gap.

East Africa

East African Campaign (World War II)

The Italian conquest of British Somaliland started on 3rd August 1940, the 3/15th Punjab Regiment were amongst the forces on hand and they were quickly reinforced from Aden by the 1/2nd Punjab Regiment on 7th August.

After the battle of Tug Argan, the British force was forced to withdraw, the 3/15th Punjab forming part of the rearguard. By 19th August, the British and Indian battalions were evacuated to Aden.

British ground losses were 38 killed, 102 wounded, and 120 missing, compared to Italian casualties of 465 killed, 1,530 wounded, and 34 missing.

In December 1940, the 4th Indian Infantry Division was rushed from Egypt to join the 5th Indian Infantry Division in the Sudan. From February to April 1941, the Indian 4th and 5th Infantry Divisions took part in the Battle of Keren.

By the end of the campaign, the Italian forces had been cleared from Eritrea and Abyssinia 220,000 of them becoming prisoners of war.

Iraq and Persia

Anglo-Iraqi War, Iraqforce, and Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran

In 1941, forces were required to participate in the Anglo-Iraqi War, to safeguard the overland supply route to the Soviet Union.

In April, the 8th Indian Infantry Division landed at Basra and marched on Baghdad securing Iraq for the Allied cause from the pro German Rashid Ali Operation Barbarossa the German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941, placed the Persian oil fields in danger from the advancing German Army.

In August 1941, the Indian 8th and 10th Infantry Divisions invaded southern Persia to secure the oil installations.

The 8th and 10th Indian Infantry Divisions, 2nd Indian Armoured Brigade and the British 4th Cavalry Brigade were all involved in the Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran (August–September 1941), which was rapid and conducted with ease.

From the south, two battalions from 8th Divisions 24th Indian Brigade making an amphibious crossing of the Shatt al-Arab, captured the petroleum installations at Abadan.

The 8th Division then advanced from Basra towards Qasr Shiekh and by 28 August had reached Ahvaz when the Shah ordered hostilities to cease.

Further north, eight battalions of British and Indian troops under Major-General William Slim advanced from Khanaqin into the Naft-i-Shah oilfield and on towards the Pai Tak Pass, leading towards Kermanshah and Hamadan.

The Pai Tak position was taken on 27th August after the defenders had withdrawn in the night; the planned assault on Kermanshah on 29th August was aborted when the defenders called a truce to negotiate surrender terms.]

After hostilities had ended, the 2nd Indian Infantry Division, 6th Indian Infantry Division and 12th Indian Infantry Division all remained in the region on internal security duties.

Syria and Lebanon

Syria-Lebanon Campaign

The Indian Army supplied the 5th brigade, 4th Indian Infantry Division which attacked from the south with the Australian I Corps and the 10th Indian Infantry Division which also had the 17th Indian Infantry Brigade, 8th Indian Infantry Division under command was part of Iraqforce attack northern and central Syria from the east.

5th Brigade took part in the Battle of Kissoué and the Battle of Damascus, June 1941, and 10th Division the Battle of Deir ez-Zor in July.

South-East Asia
Battle of Hong Kong

The Japanese Army attacked Hong Kong on 8 December 1941, less than eight hours after their attack on Pearl Harbor, among the defenders were the 5/7th Rajput Regiment and the 2/14th Punjab Regiment. The garrison held out for 18 days before being forced to surrender.

Malaya

Malaya Command, Battle of Malaya, and Japanese Invasion of Malaya

As in Egypt, the Indian Army dispatched one infantry brigade to Malaya just before the start of the war.

By 1941, all training and equipment was geared to fight in North Africa and the Middle East and the forces in Burma and Malaya had been depleted to supply reinforcements to the forces in the west.

So in the spring of 1941, the 9th Indian Infantry Division was sent to Malaya,

On 8th December, the Japanese Army attacked the Malayan peninsula, the defenders now included the Indian 9th and the 11th Indian Infantry Divisions, the 12th Indian Infantry Brigade and a number of independent battalions and units of Imperial Service Troops, in the III Indian Corps.

The 11th Indian division fought the Battle of Jitra 11th–13th December, the Battle of Kampar 30th December – 2nd January, the Battle of Slim River 6th–8th January 1942.

The 44th Indian Infantry Brigade and the 45th Indian Infantry Brigade had arrived as reinforcement in January 1942.

The 45th Brigade fought the Battle of Muar 14th–22nd January, of the 4,000 men in the brigade only 800 survived the battle.

Battle of Singapore

The Battle of Singapore 31st January – 15th February ended with the capture of 9th and 11th Indian Divisions and the 12th, 44th and 45th brigades and 55,000 Indian servicemen were made prisoners of war.

During the battle for Singapore, Indian units fought in the Battle of Bukit Timah and the Battle of Pasir Panjang.

Battle of Borneo (1941–42)

In late 1940, Air Chief Marshal Sir Robert Brooke-Popham ordered the 2nd Battalion, 15th Punjab Regiment and a heavy 6 in (150 mm) gun battery from the Hong Kong-Singapore Royal Artillery, to be positioned at Kuching, the capital of Sarawak.

The battalion, which numbered about 1,050 men, was commanded by British Lieutenant Colonel C.M. Lane and was a part of “SARFOR” (Sarawak Force).

Some 230 men of the battalion were killed or captured in the defence of the airfield before the fall of the city to the Japanese on 24th December 1941.

Two days later, SARFOR was disbanded; on the 27th, the remainder of the Punjabi force crossed into Dutch Borneo, where Lane placed them under Dutch command. The men continued to resist the Japanese in the dense jungle of southern Borneo until 1st April, when they finally surrendered.

Arthur Percival, GOC Malaya, later called their resistance “a feat of endurance which assuredly will rank high in the annals of warfare. It says much for the morale of this fine battalion that it remained a formed and disciplined body to the end.”

Burma

Burma Campaign

At the same time, the 9th Division was sent to reinforce Malaya, in the spring of 1941, an infantry brigade was sent to reinforce Burma followed by a second brigade later in the year.

On 8th December, the Japanese Army invaded Burma from Siam.

Withdrawing to India, the last British and Indian escaped from Burma in July 1942.

Japanese conquest of Burma

The Battle of Bilin River was fought in February 1942, by the 17th Indian Infantry Division. The 17th Division held the Japanese at the Bilin River for two days of close-quarters jungle fighting.

The Japanese tactics were to outflank, and eventually with encirclement imminent, they were given permission to fall back. The division disengaged under cover of darkness and began a 30 miles (48 km) retreat along the dusty track to the Sittang bridge.

The Battle of Sittang Bridge followed after which 17th Division lost most of its artillery, vehicles and other heavy equipment.

Its infantry manpower was 3,484 just over 40% of its establishment, though it was already well under-strength before the battle started.

The Battle of Pegu in March was carried out by the surviving elements of the 17th Division and the 7th British Armoured Brigade, which had just arrived from the Middle East.

In April, the Battle of Yenangyaung was fought between the 7th Armoured Brigade, 48th Indian Infantry Brigade and 1st Burma Division for control of the Yenangyaung oil fields.

The Japanese suffered heavy casualties during the battle, but the Allied forces were too weak to hold the oil fields and had to retreat to the north.

The fighting retreat to India, was successfully completed in May just before the monsoons would have cut them off.

Approximately 12,000 of the 40,000 Indian prisoners of war who were captured either during the Malayan campaign or surrendered at Singapore were led by Mohan Singh as the First Indian National Army which was dissolved in December 1942.

Burma Campaign 1942-1943

The Arakan Campaign, which began in December 1942, conducted by what at the time was an improvised formation 14th Indian Infantry Division was a failure.

The average British and Indian soldier was not properly trained for fighting in jungle, which together with repeated defeats adversely affected morale.

This was exacerbated by poor administration in the rear areas. Drafts of reinforcements sent to replace casualties were found in some cases to have not even completed basic training.

There were also questions asked about the ability of the Indian Army’s high command, which led to the creation of the position of Supreme Allied Commander South East Asia Command, leaving the army high command to concentrate on internal security and administration.

There was continual patrol activity and low-key fighting south of Imphal, but neither army possessed the resources to mount decisive operations.

17th Division held positions around the town of Tiddim 100 miles (160 km) south of Imphal, and skirmished with units of the 33rd Japanese Division.

The Japanese had a shorter and easier supply line from the port of Kalewa on the Chindwin River and had the upper hand for most of 1942 and 1943.

Burma Campaign 1944

The Battle of the Admin Box (5th, 7th and 26th Indian, 81st (West Africa) Division, 36th British Infantry Division) in February, came after a limited allied offensive.

The Japanese had infiltrated the widely dispersed lines of the 7th Division, and moved north undetected crossed the Kalapanzin River and swung west and south, and attacked the HQ of the 7th Division.

The forward divisions were ordered to dig in and hold their positions rather than retreat, while the reserve divisions advanced to their relief.

On the ground, the fighting for the Admin Box was severe and Japanese fire caused heavy casualties in the crowded defences and twice set ammunition dumps on fire.

However, all attempts to overrun the defenders were thwarted by the tanks of the 25th Dragoons. Although Allied casualties were higher than the Japanese, the Japanese had been forced to abandon many of their wounded to die.

For the first time in the Burma Campaign, the Japanese tactics had been countered and turned against them and British and Indian soldiers had held and defeated a major Japanese attack.

The Battle of Imphal and the Battle of Sangshak (17th, 20th, 23rd Indian Divisions, 50th Indian Parachute Brigade and 254th Indian Tank Brigade) took place in the region around the city of Imphal, the capital of the state of Manipur in North-East India from March until July 1944.

Japanese armies attempted to destroy the Allied forces at Imphal and invade India, but were driven back into Burma with heavy losses.

The Battle of Kohima (50th Indian Parachute Brigade 5th, 7th Indian and 2nd British Division) was the turning point of the Japanese U Go offensive.

The Japanese attempted to capture Kohima ridge, a feature which dominated the road by which the major British and Indian troops at Imphal were supplied.

British and Indian reinforcements counter-attacked to drive the Japanese from the positions they had captured. The Japanese abandoned the ridge, but continued to block the Kohima-Imphal road.

From 16th May to 22nd June, the British and Indian troops pursued the retreating Japanese and reopened the road. The battle ended on 22nd June when British and Indian troops from Kohima and Imphal met at Milestone 109.

Burma Campaign 1944-1945

The Battle of Meiktila and Mandalay (5th 7th, 17th, 19th, 20th Indian, 2nd British Divisions and 254th and 255th Indian Tank Brigades) between January and March 1945, were decisive battles near the end of the Burma Campaign.

Despite logistical difficulties, the Allies were able to deploy large armoured and mechanised forces in Central Burma, and also possessed air supremacy.

Most of the Japanese forces in Burma were destroyed during the battles, allowing the Allies to later recapture the capital, Rangoon, and reoccupy most of the country with little organised opposition.

The Battle of Ramree Island (26th Indian Infantry Division) was fought for six weeks during January and February 1945, as part of the XV Indian Corps 1944–45 offensive on the Southern Front of the Burma Campaign.

Ramree Island lies off the Burma coast and was captured along with the rest of Southern Burma, during the early stages of the Campaign, by the rapidly advancing Imperial Japanese Army in 1942.

In January 1945 the Allies were able to launch attacks to retake Ramree and its neighbour Cheduba, with the intention of building sea-supplied airbases on them.

Operation Dracula and the Battle of Elephant Point (5th, 17th Infantry, and 44th Indian Airborne Division 2nd, 36th British Division and 255th Tank Brigade) was the name given to an airborne and amphibious attack on Rangoon by British and Indian forces. When it was launched, the Imperial Japanese Army had already abandoned the city.

Return to Malaya and Singapore

Operation Tiderace and Operation Zipper

25th Indian Infantry Division with 3 Commando Brigade, in January 1945 the Division took part in the first large scale Amphibious Operations in South East Asia, They were ferried across the Four Mile wide Mayu Estuary to land on the Northern beaches of Akyab Island, in the course of the following weeks they occupied Myrbaw and Ruywa.

In April 1945. the division was withdrawn to South India to prepare for Operation Zipper the invasion of Malaya, having been chosen for the assault landing role.

Although hostilities then ceased, the operation proceeded as planned, 23rd and 25th Divisions was the first formations to land in Malaya 9thSeptember, and then accepting the surrender of the Japanese Army.

Operation Tiderace (5th Indian Infantry Division) commenced when troops set sail from Trincomalee and Rangoon on 21st August for Singapore.

The fleet arrived in Singapore on 4 September 1945, and Japanese forces in Singapore officially surrendered to Admiral Lord Louis Mountbatten, Supreme Allied Commander South East Asia Command on 12th September 1945.

Mopping up

After the Japanese surrender, some divisions were sent to disarm the Japanese and assist the local governments. The 7th Division moved to Thailand, where it disarmed the Japanese occupying army, and liberated and repatriated Allied prisoners of war.

The 20th Division was sent to Indo China, occupying the southern part of the country. There were several battles with the Viet Minh, who were intent on achieving independence.

The 23rd Division was sent to Java, where the end of the war had brought widespread disorder and conflict between the Dutch colonial regime and pro-independence movements.

Europe

British Expeditionary Force (World War II) and Battle of France

Probably the most unusual posting of any unit of the Indian Army during World War II was in 1940, when four mule companies of the Indian Army Service Corps joined the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) in France.

They were evacuated from Dunkirk with the rest of the BEF in May 1940, and were still stationed in England in July 1942.

Italian Campaign (World War II)

The Allies landed in Italy on 9th September 1943. The 4th, 8th and 10th Indian Divisions and the 43rd Independent Gurkha Infantry Brigade were all involved during the campaign.

In October 1943, the 8th Indian Division fighting on the Adriatic front reached the Barbara Line which was breached in early November.

The 8th Division led the assault on the German defensive Bernhardt Line, crossed the Sangro River and advanced to just short of Pescara where Eighth Army halted to wait for better weather in the spring.

The 4th Indian Division took part in the second battle of Monte Cassino, in the final fourth battle of Monte Cassino on 11th May, on the Eighth Army front, XIII Corps had made two strongly opposed night crossings of the Rapido by the British 4th Division and 8th Indian Infantry Division.

 By 18 May, the Germans had withdrawn to their next line.

The Gothic Line formed the last major line of defence in the final stages of the war along the summits of the Apennines The Gothic Line was breached on both the Adriatic and the central Apennine fronts during the Battle of Gemmano in August (4th Indian Divisions last battle before moving to Greece).

 On the United States Fifth Army’s far right wing, on the right of the XIII Corps front, 8th Indian Division fighting across trackless ground had captured the heights of Femina Morta, and 6th British Armoured Division had taken the San Godenzo Pass on Route 67 to Forlì, both on 18 September.

On 5th October, the 10th Indian Division, switched from British X Corps to British V Corps, had crossed the Fiumicino river high in the hills and turned the German defensive line on the river forcing the German Tenth Army units downstream to pull back towards Bologna.

In the 1945 spring offensive, the critical role of getting across the Senio, honeycombed with defensive tunnels and bunkers front and rear, was given to the 8th Indian Division, reprising the role they played crossing the Rapido in the final Battle of Monte Cassino.

On 29th April 1945, the Germans signed an instrument of surrender; hostilities in Italy formally ceased on 2nd May.

Greek Civil War

On 24th October 1944, the 4th Indian Infantry Division were shipped to Greece, to help stabilise the country after the German withdrawal.

The plan called for the division to be dispersed in three widely scattered areas. The 7th Indian Brigade and Divisional troops were allocated Greek Macedonia, Thrace and Thessaly, with instructions to keep watch on the borders of Yugoslavia and Bulgaria.

The 11th Indian Brigade would garrison the towns of Western Greece and the Ionian islands. The 5th Indian Brigade would take over the Aegean area and the Cyclades, and would move into Crete when the enemy garrisons in that island capitulated.

On 3rd December, the ELAS members of the Greek Government resigned.

A general strike was declared, and police opened fire on demonstrators. In Italy, the 4th and 46th British Infantry Divisions were ordered to leave for Greece.

On 15th January, a truce had been concluded in Athens, by the terms of which ELAS undertook to withdraw from the capital and Salonika and to occupy rural concentration areas. Except for isolated incidents, this truce ended operations in Greece.

India

The 14th Indian Infantry Division and the 39th Indian Infantry Division were converted to training formations in 1943, and remained in India till the end of the war.

Other units that only served in India include the 32nd Indian Armoured Division and the 43rd Indian Armoured Division which never completed forming before being converted to the 44th Indian Airborne Division in 1943.

The Assam-based 21st Indian Infantry Division was also broken up to form 44th Airborne in 1944. The 34th Indian Infantry Division provided the garrison for Ceylon, and remained there during the war, it was disbanded in 1945, never having seen active service.

Victoria Cross

Indian personnel received 4,000 awards for gallantry, and 18 Victoria Crosses.

The Victoria Cross (VC) is the highest military decoration, which is, or has been, awarded for valour “in the face of the enemy” to members of the armed forces of the Commonwealth countries, and previous British Empire territories. The Victoria Cross is awarded for

… most conspicuous bravery, or some daring or pre-eminent act of valour or self-sacrifice, or extreme devotion to duty in the presence of the enemy.

The following members of the Indian Army were recipients of the Victoria Cross in World War II;

East African campaign awards

Second-Lieutenant Premindra Singh Bhagat, Corps of Indian Engineers
During the pursuit of the enemy following the capture of Metemma on the night 31st January – 1st February 1941, for his persistence (over a period of 96 hours working from dawn to dusk) and gallantry, in personally supervising the clearing of 15 minefields.

Subadar Richhpal Ram, 6th Rajputana Rifles (posthumous award)
On 7th February 1941, at Keren, Eritrea, Richhpal Ram led a successful attack on the enemy and subsequently repelled six counter-attacks and then, without a shot left, brought the few survivors of his company back. Five days later, when leading another attack, his right foot was blown off, but he continued to encourage his men until he died.
Malayan campaign awards

Lieutenant Colonel Arthur Edward Cumming, 12th Frontier Force Regiment
On 3rd January 1942, near Kuantan, Malaya, the Japanese made a furious attack on the battalion and a strong enemy force penetrated the position. Cumming, with a small party of men, immediately led a counter-attack and although all his men became casualties and he, himself, had two bayonet wounds in the stomach he managed to restore the situation sufficiently for the major portion of the battalion and its vehicles to be withdrawn. Later, he drove in a carrier, under very heavy fire, collecting isolated detachments of his men and was again wounded. His gallant actions helped the brigade to withdraw safely.

Tunisian campaign awards

Company Havildar Major Chhelu Ram, 6th Rajputana Rifles (posthumous award)
On the night of 19th–20th April 1943, at Djebel Garci, Tunisia, despite being wounded took command of the company, leading them in hand-to-hand fighting. Wounded again, he continued rallying his men until he died.

Subadar Lalbahadur Thapa, 2nd Gurkha Rifles
On 5th–6th April 1943, during the silent attack on Rass-es-Zouai, Tunisia, Lalbahadur Thapa, commanding two sections, made his first contact with the enemy at the foot of a pathway winding up a narrow cleft which was thickly studded with enemy posts. The garrison of the out-posts were all killed by the subadar and his men, by kukri or bayonet and the next machine-gun posts were dealt with similarly. This officer then continued to fight his way up the bullet-swept approaches to the crest where he and the riflemen with him killed four – the rest fled. This made advance by the whole division was made possible.

Burma campaign awards

Captain Michael Allmand. 6th Gurkha Rifles (posthumous award)

On 1th1 June 1944, when his platoon come within 20 yards of the Pin Hmi Road Bridge, the enemy opened heavy and accurate fire, inflicting severe casualties and forcing the men to seek cover. Captain Allmand, however, with the utmost gallantry charged on by himself, hurling grenades into the enemy gun positions and killing three Japanese himself with his kukrie. Inspired by the splendid example of their platoon commander the surviving men followed him and captured their objective. Two days later Captain Allmand, owing to casualties among the officers, took over command of the Company and, dashing 30 yards ahead of it through long grass and marshy ground, swept by machine gun fire, personally killed a number of enemy machine gunners and successfully led his men onto the ridge of high ground that they had been ordered to seize. Once again, on 23 June, in the final attack on the Railway Bridge at Mogaung, Captain Allmand, although suffering from trench-foot, which made it difficult for him to walk, moved forward alone through deep mud and shell-holes and charged a Japanese machine gun nest single-handed, but he was mortally wounded and died shortly afterwards.

Major Frank Gerald Blaker 9th Gurkha Rifles (posthumous award)
On 9 July 1944, Major Blaker was commanding a company which was held up during an important advance by close-range firing from medium and light machine-guns. The major went ahead of his men through very heavy fire and despite being severely wounded in the arm, located the machine-guns and charged the position alone. Even when mortally wounded, he continued to cheer on his men whilst lying on the ground. His fearless leadership inspired his men to storm and capture the objective.

Naik Fazal Din, 10th Baluch Regiment (posthumous award)
On 2nd March 1945, during an attack, Naik Fazal Din’s section was held up by fire from the enemy bunkers, whereupon he personally attacked the nearest bunker and silenced it, then led his men against the other. Suddenly six Japanese, led by two officers wielding swords, rushed out and Naik Fazal Din was run through the chest by one of them. As the sword was withdrawn, the naik wrested it from the hands of its owner and killed him with it. Having killed another Japanese with the sword he waved it aloft, continuing to encourage his men before staggering back to make his report and collapsing.

Havildar Gaje Ghale, 5th Gurkha Rifles
During the period 24–27 May 1943, Havildar Gaje Ghale was in charge of a platoon of young soldiers engaged in attacking a strong Japanese position. Wounded in the arm, chest and leg he nevertheless continued to lead assault after assault, encouraging his men by shouting the Gurkha’s battle-cry. Spurred on by the irresistible will of their leader, the platoon stormed and captured the position which the havildar then held and consolidated under heavy fire, refusing to go to the Regimental Aid post until ordered to do so.

Rifleman Bhanbhagta Gurung, 2nd Gurkha Rifles
On 5th March 1945, his company became pinned down by an enemy sniper and were suffering casualties. As this sniper was inflicting casualties on the section, Rifleman Bhanbhagta Gurung, being unable to fire from the lying position, stood up fully exposed to the heavy fire and calmly killed the enemy sniper with his rifle, thus saving his section from suffering further casualties. The section advanced again but came under heavy fire once again. Without waiting for orders, Gurung dashed out to attack the first enemy fox-hole. Throwing two grenades, he killed the two occupants and without any hesitation rushed on to the next enemy fox-hole and killed the Japanese in it with his bayonet. He cleared two further fox-holes with bayonet and grenade. “During his single-handed attacks on these four enemy fox-holes, Rifleman Bhanbhagta Gurung was subjected to almost continuous and point-blank Light Machine Gun fire from a bunker on the North tip of the objective.” For the fifth time, Gurung “went forward alone in the face of heavy enemy fire to knock out this position. He doubled forward and leapt on to the roof of the bunker from where, his hand grenades being finished, he flung two No. 77 smoke grenades into the bunker slit.” Gurung killed two Japanese soldiers who ran out of the bunker with his Kukri, and then advanced into the cramped bunker and killed the remaining Japanese soldier. Gurung ordered three others to take up positions in the bunker. “The enemy counter-attack followed soon after, but under Rifleman Bhanbhagta Gurung’s command the small party inside the bunker repelled it with heavy loss to the-enemy. Rifleman Bhanbhagta Gurung showed outstanding bravery and a complete disregard for his own safety. His courageous clearing of five enemy positions single-handed was in itself decisive in capturing the objective and his inspiring example to the rest of the Company contributed to the speedy consolidation of this success.

Rifleman Lachhiman Gurung, 8th Gurkha Rifles
On 12th–13th May 1945, Rifleman Lachhiman Gurung was manning the most forward post of his platoon which bore the brunt of an attack by at least 200 of the enemy. Twice he hurled back grenades which had fallen on his trench, but the third exploded in his right hand, blowing off his fingers, shattering his arm and severely wounding him in the face, body and right leg. His two comrades were also badly wounded but the rifleman, now alone and disregarding his wounds, loaded and fired his rifle with his left hand for four hours, calmly waiting for each attack which he met with fire at point blank range. Afterwards, when the casualties were counted, it is reported that there were 31 dead Japanese around his position which he had killed, with only one arm.

Jemadar Abdul Hafiz, 9th Jat Regiment (posthumous award)
On 6th April 1944, Jemadar Abdul Hafiz was ordered to attack with his platoon a prominent position held by the enemy, the only approach to which was across a bare slope and then up a very steep cliff. The Jemadar led the assault, killing several of the enemy himself and then pressed on regardless of machine-gun fire from another feature. He received two wounds, the second of which was fatal, but he had succeeded in routing an enemy vastly superior in numbers and had captured a most important position.

Lieutenant Karamjeet Singh Judge, 15th Punjab Regiment (posthumous award)
On 18 March 1945, Lieutenant Karamjeet Singh Judge, a platoon commander of a company ordered to capture a cotton mill, dominated the battlefield by his numerous acts of gallantry. After eliminating ten enemy bunkers he directed one tank to within 20 yards of another and asked the tank commander to cease fire while he went in to mop up. While doing so he was mortally wounded.

Rifleman Ganju Lama, 7th Gurkha Rifles
On 12th June 1944,’B’ Company was attempting to stem the enemy’s advance when it came under heavy machine-gun and tank machine-gun fire. Rifleman Ganju Lama, with complete disregard for his own safety, took his PIAT gun and, crawling forward, succeeded in bringing the gun into action within 30 yards of the enemy tanks, knocking out two of them. Despite a broken wrist and two other serious wounds to his right and left hands he then moved forward and engaged the tank crew who were trying to escape. Not until he had accounted for all of them did he consent to have his wounds dressed.

Rifleman Tul Bahadur Pun, 6th Gurkha Rifles
On 23rd June 1944, during an attack on the railway bridge, a section of one of the platoons was wiped out with the exception of Rifleman Tul Bahadur Pun, his section commander and one other. The section commander immediately led a charge on the enemy position but was at once badly wounded, as was the third man. Rifleman Pun, with a Bren gun continued the charge alone in the face of shattering fire and reaching the position, killed three of the occupants and put five more to flight, capturing two light machine-guns and much ammunition. He then gave accurate supporting fire, enabling the rest of his platoon to reach their objective.

Rifleman Agansing Rai, 5th Gurkha Rifles
On 26th June 1944, under withering fire Agansing Rai and his party charged a machine-gun. Agansing Rai himself killed three of the crew. When the first position had been taken, he then led a dash on a machine-gun firing from the jungle, where he killed three of the crew, his men accounting for the rest. He subsequently tackled an isolated bunker single-handed, killing all four occupants. The enemy were now so demoralised that they fled and the second post was recaptured.

Sepoy Bhandari Ram, 10th Baluch Regiment
On 22nd November 1944, Sepoy Bhandari Ram’s platoon was pinned down by machine-gun fire. Although wounded he crawled up to a Japanese light machine-gun in full view of the enemy and was wounded again, but continued crawling to within 5 yards of his objective. He then threw a grenade into the position, killing the gunner and two others. This action inspired his platoon to rush and capture the enemy position. Only then did he allow his wounds to be dressed.

Lance Naik Sher Shah, 16th Punjab Regiment (posthumous award)
On 19th–20th January 1945, Lance Naik Sher Shah was commanding a left forward section of his platoon when it was attacked by overwhelming numbers of Japanese. He broke up two attacks by crawling right in among the enemy and shooting at point-blank range. On the second occasion he was hit and his leg shattered, but he maintained that his injury was only slight and when the third attack came, he again crawled forward engaging the enemy until he was shot through the head and killed.

Naik Gian Singh, 15th Punjab Regiment
On 2 March 1945, Naik Gian Singh who was in charge of the leading section of his platoon, went on alone firing his tommy gun, and rushed the enemy foxholes. In spite of being wounded in the arm, he went on, hurling grenades. He attacked and killed the crew of a cleverly concealed anti-tank gun, and then led his men down a lane clearing all enemy positions. He went on leading his section until the action had been satisfactorily completed.

Naik Nand Singh, 11th Sikh Regiment
On 11th–12th March 1944, Naik Nand Singh, commanding a leading section of the attack, was ordered to recapture a position gained by the enemy. He led his section up a very steep knife-edged ridge under very heavy machine-gun and rifle fire and although wounded in the thigh, captured the first trench. He then crawled forward alone and, wounded again in the face and shoulder, nevertheless captured the second and third trenches.

Havildar Parkash Singh, 8th Punjab Regiment
On 6th January 1943, Havildar Parkash Singh drove his own carrier forward and rescued the crews of two disabled carriers under very heavy fire. Again on 19 January in the same area he rescued two more carriers which had been put out of action by an enemy anti-tank gun. He then went out yet again and brought to safety another disabled carrier containing two wounded men.

Jemadar Prakash Singh Chib, 13th Frontier Force Rifles (posthumous award)
On 16th-17th February 1945, Jemadar Prakash Singh was commanding a platoon which took the main weight of fierce enemy attacks. He was wounded in both ankles and relieved of his command, but when his second-in-command was also wounded, he crawled back and took command of his unit again, directing operations and encouraging his men. He was wounded in both legs a second time but he continued to direct the defence, dragging himself from place to place by his hands. When wounded a third time and final time, he lay shouting the Dogra war-cry as he died, inspiring his company that finally drove off the enemy.

Havildar Umrao Singh, Indian Artillery Regiment
On 15th–16th December 1944, Havildar Umrao Singh was a field gun detachment commander in an advanced section of the 30th Mountain Regiment, Indian Artillery, attached to the 81st West African Division. Singh’s gun was in an advanced position, supporting the 8th Gold Coast Regiment. After a 90-minute sustained bombardment from 75 mm guns and mortars, Singh’s gun position was attacked by at least two companies of Japanese infantry. Using a Bren light machine gun he directed the rifle fire of the gunners, holding off the assault, and was wounded by two grenades. A second wave of attackers killed all but Singh and two other gunners, but was also beaten off. The three soldiers had only a few bullets remaining, and these were rapidly exhausted in the initial stages of the assault by a third wave of attackers. Undaunted, Singh picked up a “gun bearer” (a heavy iron rod, similar to a crow bar) and used that as a weapon in hand-to-hand fighting. He was seen to strike down three infantrymen, before succumbing to a rain of blows. Six hours later, after a counterattack, he was found alive but unconscious near to his artillery piece, almost unrecognisable from a head injury, still clutching his gun bearer. Ten Japanese soldiers lay dead nearby. His field gun was back in action later that day.

Subadar Ram Sarup Singh, 1st Punjab Regiment (posthumous award)
On 25thOctober 1944, two platoons were ordered to attack a particularly strong enemy position. The platoon commanded by Subadar Ram Sarup Singh attained its objective, completely routing the enemy, and although the subadar was wounded in both legs he insisted on carrying on. Later, the enemy’s fierce counter-attack was only halted by Subadar Ram Sarup Singh’s dashing counter-charge in which he killed four of the enemy himself. He was again wounded, in the thigh, but continued to lead his men, killing two more of the enemy, until he was mortally wounded.

Acting Subedar Netrabahadur Thapa, 5th Gurkha Rifles (posthumous award)
On 25th–26th June 1944, Acting Subedar Thapa was in command of a small isolated hill post at Bishenpur, Burma when the Japanese army attacked in force. The men, inspired by their leader’s example, held their ground and the enemy were beaten off, but casualties were very heavy and reinforcements were requested. When these arrived some hours later they also suffered heavy casualties. Thapa retrieved the reinforcements’ ammunition himself and mounted an offensive with grenades and kukris, until he was killed.

Italian campaign awards

Naik Yeshwant Ghadge, 5th Mahratta Light Infantry (posthumous award)
On 10th July 1944, a rifle section commanded by Naik Yeshwant Ghadge came under heavy machine-gun fire at close range which killed or wounded all members of the section except the commander. Without hesitation Naik Yeshwant Ghadge rushed the machine-gun position, first throwing a grenade which knocked out the machine-gun and firer and then he shot one of the gun crew. Finally, having no time to change his magazine, he clubbed to death the two remaining members of the crew. He fell mortally wounded, shot by an enemy sniper.

Rifleman Thaman Gurung, 5th Gurkha Rifles (posthumous award)
On 10t November 1944, Rifleman Thaman Gurung was acting as a scout to a fighting patrol. It was undoubtedly due to his hsuperb gallantry that his platoon was able to withdraw from an extremely difficult position without many more casualties than were in fact incurred and that some very valuable information was obtained which resulted in the capture of the feature three days later. The rifleman’s bravery cost him his life.

Sepoy Ali Haidar, 13th Frontier Force Rifles
On 9th April 1945, during the crossing of the Senio River, only Sepoy Ali Haidar and the two other men of his section managed to get across under heavy machine-gun fire. Then, while the other two covered him, the sepoy attacked the nearest strong point and, in spite of being wounded, put it out of action. In attacking a second strong-point he was again severely wounded but managed to crawl closer, throw a grenade and charge the post; two of the enemy were wounded, the remaining two surrendered. The rest of the company were then able to cross the river and establish a bridgehead.

Sepoy Namdeo Jadav, 5th Mahratta Light Infantry
On 9th April 1945, Italy, when a small party were almost wiped out in an assault on the east floodbank of the river, Sepoy Namdeo Jadav carried two wounded men under heavy fire through deep water, up a steep bank and through a mine belt to safety. Then, determined to avenge his dead comrades, he eliminated three enemy machine-gun posts. Finally, climbing on top of the bank he shouted the Maratha war cry and waved the remaining companies across. He not only saved many lives but enabled the battalion to secure the bridgehead and ultimately to crush all enemy resistance in the area.

Sepoy Kamal Ram, 8th Punjab Regiment
On 12th May 1944, the company advance was held up by heavy machine-gun fire from four posts on the front and flanks. The capture of the position was essential and Sepoy Kamal Ram volunteered to get round the rear of the right post and silence it. He attacked the first two posts single-handed, killing or taking prisoner the occupants and together with a Havildar he then went on to complete the destruction of a third. His outstanding bravery unquestionably saved a difficult situation at a critical period of the battle.

Rifleman Sher Bahadur Thapa, 9th Gurkha Rifles (posthumous award)
On 18th–19th September 1944, when a company of the 9th Gurkha Rifles encountered bitter opposition from a German prepared position, Rifleman Sher Bahadur Thapa and his section commander, who was afterwards badly wounded, charged and silenced an enemy machine-gun. The rifleman then went on alone to the exposed part of a ridge where, ignoring a hail of bullets, he silenced more machine-guns, covered a withdrawal and rescued two wounded men before he was killed.

George Cross

The George Cross (GC) is the counterpart of the Victoria Cross and the highest gallantry award for civilians as well as for military personnel in actions which are not in the face of the enemy, or for which purely military honours would not normally be granted. The following members of the Indian Army were recipients of the George Cross in World War II;

Captain Mateen Ahmed Ansari, 7th Rajput Regiment (posthumous award)
He was taken prisoner by the Japanese after they invaded Hong Kong in December 1941. After the Japanese discovered that he was related to the ruler of one of the Princely States, they demanded that he renounce his allegiance to the British and foment discontent in the ranks of Indian prisoners in the prison camps. He refused and was thrown into the notorious Stanley Jail in May 1942, where he was starved and brutalised. When he remained firm in his allegiance to the British on his return to the prison camps, he was again incarcerated in Stanley Jail, where he was starved and tortured for five months. He was then returned to the original camp, where he continued his allegiance to the British, and even helped to organise escape attempts by other prisoners. He was sentenced to death, with over 30 other British, Chinese and Indian prisoners and beheaded on 20th October 1943.

Sowar Ditto Ram, Central India Horse (posthumous award)
Sowar Ditto Ram was posthumously awarded the George Cross for his gallantry in helping a wounded comrade on 23 July 1944 at Monte Cassino in Italy.
Lieutenant Colonel Mahmood Khan Durrani, 1st Bahawalpur Infantry, Indian State Forces
At the time of his capture, he was attached to the 1st Bahawalpur Infantry of the Indian State Forces. During the retreat in Malaya in 1942, he and small party of soldiers managed to evade capture for three months before their location was betrayed to the Japanese sponsored Indian Nationalist Army. He refused to co-operate with the INA and worked to counter their attempts to infiltrate agents into India. In May 1944, he was arrested and systematically starved and tortured by the Japanese, but refused to betray his comrades. He was then handed over by the Japanese to the INA where he was again brutally tortured and, at one point, sentenced to death. He stood firm throughout his ordeal.

Lance Naik Islam-ud-Din, 9th Jat Regiment (posthumous award)
12 April 1945 in Pyawbwe, Central Burma when he sacrificed his own life to save others.

Naik Kirpa Ram 13th Frontier Force Rifles (posthumous award)
During a field firing exercise at a rest camp in Bangalore, a rifle grenade misfired and fell only eight yards from his section. The twenty-eight-year-old soldier rushed forward, shouting at the men to take cover and attempted to throw it to a safe distance. It exploded in his hand, wounding him fatally, but his self-sacrifice saved his comrades from harm.

Havildar Abdul Rahman, 9th Jat Regiment (posthumous award)
He was awarded the decoration for the gallantry he showed in attempting an air crash rescue on 22 February 1945 in Kletek in Java.

Lieutenant Subramanian, Queen Victoria’s Own Madras Sappers and Miners (posthumous award)
Sacrificed his own life on 24 June 1944 by throwing himself over a mine to protect others from the blast.

Aftermath

World War II cost the lives of over 87,000 soldiers, air crews and mariners from the Indian Empire,this included 24,338 killed and 11,754 missing in action.

The overwhelming majority being members of the Indian Army. Another 34,354 more were wounded.

Of the 79,489 Indian personnel who become prisoners of war, German and/or Italian forces held 15,000–17,000.

Between 2,500 and 4,000 of these POWs subsequently enlisted in the Italian Battaglione Azad Hindoustan and/or German Indische Legion, with the intention of fighting the Allies.

More than 40,000 Indian POWs captured by Japanese forces volunteered for the pro-Japanese Indian National Army (INA), which fought the Allies in Burma and north-east India.

Out of 60,000 Indian POWs taken at the Fall of Singapore, 11,000 died in Japanese camps from disease, malnutrition, physical abuse, or overwork;

Many of these had been transported to New Guinea or the Solomon Islands, where they were used as forced labour by Japanese forces.

In late 1943, when Italy capitulated to the Allies, Indians were among tens of thousands of Allied POWs who escaped from, or were liberated from POW camps. During 1943 and 1944, 128 Indian POWs were repatriated from Germany in prisoner exchanges.[135] More than 200 Indian POWs died in captivity in Europe.

By 30 April 1945, only 8,950 Indian prisoners of war remained in German camps.

The German Indische Legion saw little front-line action, suffered few casualties and many of its recruits were returned to POW camps. In July 1945, the British government reported that at least 1,045 members of the Legion had already been repatriated to India, or were being held for questioning in the UK, while about 700 remained at large in Europe.

Conversely, 2,615 of the POWs recruited by the INA were killed in action against the Allies or missing.

World War II was the last time the Indian Army fought as part of the British military apparatus, as independence and partition followed in 1947.

On 3rd June 1947, the British Government announced the plan for the partition of the sub–continent between India and Pakistan.

On 30th June 1947, the procedure for the division of the armed forces was agreed upon. After partition the British Indian Army was divided between the new Indian Army and the Pakistan Army. Field Marshal Claude Auchinleck, then Commander-in-Chief, India, was appointed Supreme Commander to ensure smooth division of units, stores and so on. It was announced on 1st July 1947, that both countries would have operational control of their respective armed forces by 15th August 1947.

Sourced from Wikipedia 

Indian Army during World War I

 Articles  Comments Off on Indian Army during World War I
Apr 022017
 

Indian Army during World War I

The Indian Army during World War I contributed a large number of divisions and independent brigades to the European, Mediterranean and the Middle East theatres of war in World War I.

Over one million Indian troops served overseas, of whom 62,000 died and another 67,000 were wounded. In total at least 74,187 Indian soldiers died during the war.

In World War I the Indian Army fought against the German Empire in German East Africa and on the Western Front. At the First Battle of Ypres, Khudadad Khan became the first Indian to be awarded a Victoria Cross.

Indian divisions were also sent to Egypt, Gallipoli and nearly 700,000 served in Mesopotamia against the Ottoman Empire. While some divisions were sent overseas others had to remain in India guarding the North West Frontier and on internal security and training duties.

Field-Marshal Sir Claude Auchinleck, Commander-in-Chief of the Indian Army from 1942 asserted that the British “couldn’t have come through both wars,World War I and II, if they hadn’t had the Indian Army.”

Kitchener’s reforms

Herbert Kitchener was appointed Commander-in-Chief, India in 1902 and after five years, his term of office was extended by a further two—during which he reformed the Indian Army.

The reforms now directed that there would be only one Indian Army, the three armies of the Presidencies being merged into a unified force.

At the same time, the regiments of the Princely states were made available to be called out to become Imperial Service Troops.

The British Army also continued to supply units for service in India, in addition to those of the Indian Army. The term Army of India was instituted to refer to the overall command structure which included both the British and Indian Army units.

The new formation for the Army of India was set at nine divisions, each division with one cavalry and three infantry brigades and these nine divisions together with three independent infantry brigades would serve in India.

The Indian Army was also responsible for supplying a division in Burma and a brigade in Aden.

To assist command and control of the new divisions, two field armies were formed— the Northern Army and the Southern Army.

The Northern Army had five divisions and three brigades and was responsible for the North West Frontier to Bengal while the Southern Army, which had four divisions in India and two formations outside the subcontinent, was responsible for Baluchistan to southern India.

The regiments and battalions of the new organisation would be numbered in a single sequence and the old titles of the Bombay, Madras and the Bengal Armies would be discontinued.

The new regiments and battalions, instead of remaining at their home base, could now all be called upon to serve anywhere in the country, and a tour of duty on the North West Frontier would be an established posting.

One change that was not accepted was the formation of all-British or all-Indian brigades and the system of having one British regiment or battalion in each brigade remained.

Organisation

Indian Army during World War I order of battle

In 1914, the Indian Army was one of the two largest volunteer armies in the world with a total strength of 240,000 men, (The British Army had a strength of 247,432 regular volunteers at the outbreak of the war) and by November 1918 it contained 548,311 men, being considered the Imperial Strategic Reserve.

It was regularly called upon to deal with incursions and raids on the North West Frontier and to provide garrison forces for the British Empire in Egypt, Singapore and China.

This field force was divided into two armies: The Northern Army which stretched from the North-West Frontier to Bengal with five divisions and three brigades under command and the Southern Army which stretched from Baluchistan to southern India and it in turn had four divisions under command and two formations outside the subcontinent.

The two armies contained 39 cavalry regiments, 138 infantry battalions (including 20 Gurkha), a joint cavalry-infantry unit the Corps of Guides, three sapper regiments and 12 mountain artillery batteries.

The nine divisions formed by these reforms each consisted of one cavalry and three infantry brigades.

The cavalry brigade had one British and two Indian regiments while the infantry brigades consisted of one British and three Indian battalions.

Indian Army battalions were smaller than the British battalions, consisting of 30 officers and 723 other ranks as compared to the British 29 officers and 977 other ranks.

Indian battalions were often segregated, with companies of different tribes, castes or religions. Additional troops attached to the headquarters of each division included a cavalry regiment, a pioneer battalion and artillery provided by the British Royal Field Artillery.

Each division had about 13,000 men on strength, somewhat weaker than a British division in part due to the smaller infantry battalions and smaller artillery forces.

The Indian Army was also weakened when 500 British officers on home leave, enough to officer 38 Indian battalions, were posted to the new British divisions being formed for Kitchener’s Army.

In addition to the regular Indian Army, the armies of the Princely States and regiments of the Auxiliary Force (European volunteers) could also be called upon to assist in an emergency.

The Princely States formed the Imperial Service Brigades and in 1914, had 22,613 men in 20 cavalry regiments and 14 infantry battalions.

By the end of the war 26,000 men had served overseas on Imperial Service.

The Auxiliary force could field another 40,000 men in 11 regiments of horse and 42 volunteer infantry battalions.
Also available were the Frontier Militia and the Military Police which could field 34,000 men between them.

The field force headquarters was located in Delhi and the senior officer (Commander-in-Chief, India) was assisted by a Chief of the General Staff, India.

All the senior command and staff positions in the Indian Army alternated between senior officers of the British and Indian Armies. In 1914, the Commander–in–Chief was General Sir Beauchamp Duff of the Indian Army, and the Chief of the General Staff was Lieutenant General Sir Percy Lake of the British Army.

Each Indian battalion was staffed by 13 officers from the British Army in India and 17 officers from the Indian Army— expatriate British officers serving under colonial Indian administration.

As the war intensified and officer casualties mounted, the ability to replace casualties with officers of British origin became extremely difficult and in many cases the officer allotment to battalions was reduced accordingly.

Only in 1919 were the first Officer Cadets of Indian descent permitted to be selected for officer training at the Royal Military College.

The normal annual recruitment for the Indian army was 15,000 men, during the course of the war over 800,000 men volunteered for the army and more than 400,000 volunteered for non-combatant roles. In total almost 1.3 million men had volunteered for service by 1918.

Over one million Indian troops served overseas during the war. In total, at least 74,187 Indian soldiers died in World War I.

Britain used Indian child soldiers, some as young as 10 years old, in the war.

Home service

Hindu–German Conspiracy

Before World War I, the Indian Army was deployed maintaining internal security and defending the North West Frontier against incursions from Afghanistan.

These tasks did not end with the declaration of war. The divisions deployed along the frontier were the existing 1st (Peshawar) Division, the 2nd (Rawalpindi) Division, the 4th (Quetta) Division.

The only war-formed division to serve in India was the 16th Indian Division formed in 1916, it was also stationed on the North West Frontier. (a) All these divisions were still in place and took part in the Third Afghan War at the end of World War I.

In supporting the war effort, India was left vulnerable to hostile action from Afghanistan. A Turco-German mission arrived in Kabul in October 1915, with obvious strategic purpose.

Habibullah Khan abided by his treaty obligations and maintained Afghanistan’s neutrality, in the face of internal opposition from factions keen to side with the Ottoman Sultan.

Despite this, localised actions along the frontier still took place and included Operations in the Tochi (1914–15), Operations against the Mohmands, Bunerwals and Swatis (1915), Kalat Operations (1915–16), Mohmand Blockade (1916–17), Operations against the Mahsuds (1917) and Operations against the Marri and Khetran tribes (1918).

On the North East Frontier between India and Burma punitive actions were carried out against the Kachins tribes between December 1914 – February 1915, by the Burma Military Police supported by the 1/7th Gurkha Rifles and the 64th Pioneers.

Between November 1917 – March 1919, operations were carried out against the Kuki tribes by auxiliary units of the Assam Rifles and the Burma Military Police.

The other divisions remaining in India at first on internal security and then as training divisions were the 5th (Mhow) Division, the 8th (Lucknow) Division and the 9th (Secunderabad) Division.

Over the course of the war these divisions lost brigades to other formations on active service;
The 5th (Mhow) Division lost the 5th (Mhow) Cavalry Brigade to the 2nd Indian Cavalry Division.

The 8th (Lucknow) Division lost the 8th (Lucknow) Cavalry Brigade to the 1st Indian Cavalry Division and the 22nd (Lucknow) Brigade to the 11th Indian Division.

The 9th (Secunderabad) Division lost the 9th (Secunderabad) Cavalry Brigade to the 2nd Indian Cavalry Division and the 27th (Bangalore) Brigade which was sent to British East Africa.

The other pre war units the Burma Division, remained in Burma throughout the war on internal security duties, likewise the Aden brigade remained in Aden.

Indian Army entry into the war

In 1901 oil had been discovered in commercial quantities at Masjid-e-Suleiman at the head of the Persian Gulf.

At the start of the war in 1914, the privately owned Anglo-Persian Oil Company which owned the concessions for these fields was about to be bought by the British Government, primarily to fuel the British Fleet.

It soon became clear that the Ottoman Turkish Army was being mobilised and in August the Indian Government was instructed to prepare contingency plans to protect these strategic assets.

The plans dictated that in the event of the Turkish Army coming out in support of the Germans, the Indian Army was to act to secure the oilfields.

As a contingency, the Indian Expeditionary Force D (see below) under command of Lieutenant–General Sir Arthur Barrett sailed from Bombay on 16 October 1914 for Bahrain.

They, together with Expeditionary Force A who had been hurriedly sent to Europe at the end of September in response to a request from the Imperial General Staff for men to support the war effort— became the first Indian elements committed to war outside of India.?

Independent brigades

In addition to the permanent divisions, the Indian Army also formed a number of independent brigades.

As part of the Southern Army the Aden Brigade was stationed in the Aden Protectorate on the strategically important naval route from Europe to India, where there was limited fighting.

The Bannu Brigade, the Derajat Brigade and the Kohat Brigade were all part of the Northern Army and they were deployed along the North West Frontier.

On 12 May 1918, the Bannu and Derajat brigades were designated as the Waziristan Field Force under the command General G W Baynon.

The South Persia Brigade was formed in 1915 at the start of the Persian Campaign to protect the Anglo–Persian oil installations in south Persia and the Persian Gulf.

Expeditionary Forces

Indian Expeditionary Force A

Western Front (World War I)

On the outbreak of war the Indian Army had 150,000 trained men and the Indian Government offered the services of two cavalry and two infantry divisions for service overseas.

The force known as Indian Expeditionary Force A was under the command of General Sir James Willcocks.

Force A was attached to the British Expeditionary Force and the four divisions were formed into two army corps: an infantry Indian Corps and the Indian Cavalry Corps.

Upon arrival in Marseilles on 30th September 1914, only six weeks after the declaration of war, they were moved to the Ypres Salient and took part in the Battle of La Bassée in October 1914.

In March 1915, the 7th (Meerut) Division was chosen to lead the assault in the Battle of Neuve Chapelle.

The Expeditionary Force was hampered by a lack of familiarity with new equipment, only being issued Lee–Enfield rifles on their arrival in France and they had almost no artillery, relying on support from their neighbouring corps when in the front line.

They were not accustomed to the continental weather and were poorly equipped to resist the cold, leading to low morale which was further compounded by the reserve system, whereby reinforcements were drafted in from any regiment and had no affiliation to their new units. Officer casualties were even more of a handicap, as replacements were unfamiliar with the Indian Army and could not speak the language.

With morale low, many soldiers fled the scene of the battle and the infantry divisions were finally withdrawn to Egypt in October 1915, when they were replaced by the new British divisions of Kitchener’s Army.

With the withdrawal of the infantry divisions, the only Indian Army units on the Western Front were the two cavalry divisions. In November 1916, the two Indian cavalry divisions were renumbered from 1st and 2nd to the 4th and 5th Cavalry Divisions.

Serving alongside British cavalry divisions they were held behind the front line awaiting the hoped for breakthrough. At times during the war they served in the trenches as infantry, each cavalry brigade when dismounted formed a dismounted regiment.

This meant that when the divisions went into the front line, they could only cover a brigade area.

Before being themselves withdrawn to Egypt in March 1918, they took part in the Battle of the Somme, the Battle of Bazentin, the Battle of Flers-Courcelette, the advance to the Hindenburg Line and finally the Battle of Cambrai.
Of the 130,000 Indians who served in France and Belgium, almost 9,000 died.

Indian Expeditionary Force B

Main article: East African Campaign (World War I)
In 1914, the Governor of British East Africa requested assistance to deal with the German forces in German East Africa and the problem was handed to the India Office, which assembled two forces and shipped them to his aid.

Indian Expeditionary Force B consisted of the 27th (Bangalore) Brigade from the 9th (Secunderabad) Division and an Imperial Service Infantry Brigade, a pioneer battalion, a mountain artillery battery and engineers were sent to Tanganyika with the task of invading German East Africa.

The force under the command of Major General Arthur Aitken landed at Tanga on 2nd–3rd November 1914. In the following Battle of Tanga, Aitkens’ 8,000 men were badly beaten by the 1,000 men under their German commander Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck.

The force re-embarked on 5 November 1914, having suffered 817 casualties and the loss of several hundred rifles, 16 machine guns and 600,000 rounds of ammunition.

Indian Expeditionary Force C

Indian Expeditionary Force C was the second force assembled for service in British East Africa in 1914.

This force was formed from the Indian Army’s 29th Punjabis, together with half battalions from the Princely states of Jind, Bharatpur, Kapurthala and Rampur, a volunteer 15 pounder artillery battery, 22nd (Derajat) Mountain Battery (Frontier Force), a volunteer maxim gun battery and a Field Ambulance.

It was planned that the force was to be a defensive one (unlike force B) and be primarily used to guard the railway to Uganda and to support the King’s African Rifles in communications protection duties. After arriving in Mombasa, Force C was broken up and its units subsequently served separately.

The one action they were involved in was the Battle of Kilimanjaro, in October 1914. Force C with 4,000 men gathered near the border of British and German East Africa, commanded by Brigadier General J. M. Stewart.

Flawed intelligence reports estimated the German military presence in the region at 200 men; however, there were 600 askaris in three companies plus the colonial volunteers, 86 young Germans on horseback.

On 3rd November 1914, some 1,500 Punjabis of the British force advanced up the slope at night near Longido were caught in the crossfire of a strong German defensive position as they advanced in the morning fog.

The large force of Indian infantry effectively resisted counterattacks, however, during the day the British attackers made no headway and suffered substantial casualties. By mid-morning, a German mounted patrol ambushed a supply column and roughly 100 mules carrying water for the troops were stampeded away by the Germans.

The British officers, with their now widely scattered troops, waited until darkness and having determined their situation to be untenable, withdrew down the mountain and marched back to British East Africa having accomplished nothing.

Indian Expeditionary Force D

Mesopotamian campaign

The largest Indian Army force to serve abroad was the Indian Expeditionary Force D in Mesopotamia, under the command of Lieutenant-General Sir John Nixon.

The first unit sent in November 1914, was the 6th (Poona) Division and they were tasked with guarding British oil installations in and around Basra.

As part of the Mesopotamian campaign they served under the command of Major General Barrett and then under Major General Townshend. After a string of early successes, the campaign was delivered a setback at the Battle of Ctesiphon in November 1915 due to logistical constraints.

Following this engagement, the Poona Division withdrew back to Kut, where Townshend made the decision to hold the city and the Siege of Kut began.?

Between January and March 1916, Townshend launched several attacks in an attempt to lift the siege. In sequence, the attacks took place at the Battle of Sheikh Sa’ad, the Battle of the Wadi, the Battle of Hanna, and the Battle of Dujaila Redoubt.

These attempts to break through the encirclement did not succeed and the cost was heavy with both sides suffering high casualties.

In February food, and hopes were running out for Townshend in Kut-al-Amara. Disease spread rapidly and could not be contained or cured and Townshend surrendered in April 1916.

In December 1916, the 3rd and 7th Divisions arrived from the Western Front.

In 1917, the British force, under Frederick Stanley Maude, which now included one cavalry and seven infantry divisions from the Indian Army, in the III Corps (India) advanced towards Baghdad which was captured in March.?

The advance continued in 1918, and after the Battle of Sharqat in October, the Turkish forces surrendered and the Armistice of Mudros was signed.

The Mesopotamian campaign was largely an Indian Army campaign as the only British formations involved were the 13th (Western) Division and British battalions assigned to Indian brigades.

In the campaign, 11,012 were killed, 3,985 died of wounds, 12,678 died of disease, 13,492 were either missing or prisoners (including the 9,000 prisoners from Kut), and 51,836 were wounded.

Indian Expeditionary Force E

Sinai and Palestine Campaign and Battle of Megiddo (1918)
Indian Expeditionary Force E consisted of the 22nd (Lucknow) Brigade sent to Egypt in October 1914. The designation was retained for all subsequent forces sent there.

Two Indian cavalry divisions (4th Cavalry Division and 5th Cavalry Division) transferred from France in 1918, for service in Palestine.

They were joined by the 15th Imperial Service Cavalry Brigade, a unit formed by three regiments of Lancers from the princely states of Mysore, Hyderabad, and Jodhpur.

The 3rd (Lahore) Division and the 7th (Meerut) Division were transferred from Mesopotamia.

At the same time 36 Indian army battalions were sent to reinforce the British 10th (Irish), 53rd (Welsh), 60th (2/2nd London) and 75th Divisions, which were reformed on Indian division lines with one British and three Indian battalions per brigade.

Indian Expeditionary Force F

First Suez Offensive

Indian Expeditionary Force F consisted of the 10th Indian Division and the 11th Indian Division both of which were formed in Egypt in 1914, to defend the Suez canal.

Other formations attached were the regular 22nd (Lucknow) Brigade from the 8th Lucknow Division without their British battalions and an Imperial Service Cavalry Brigade.

The 10th Division was disbanded in 1916, and its brigades assigned to other formations.

The 28th Indian Brigade was assigned to the 7th (Meerut) Division in 1915; the 29th Indian Brigade served as an independent brigade in the Gallipoli campaign, and then disbanded in June 1917; and the 30th Indian Brigade was first assigned to the 12th Indian Division in April 1915, then transferred to the 6th (Poona) Division in September 1915 and was captured in the fall of Kut.

The 11th Division was disbanded earlier in 1915, but its brigades did not survive much longer.

The 22nd (Lucknow) Brigade was broken up in January 1916; the 31st Indian Brigade joined the 10th Division in January 1916, but was disbanded a month later; and the 32nd (Imperial Service) Brigade was disbanded in January 1916.

Indian Expeditionary Force G

Gallipoli Campaign

In April 1915, Indian Expeditionary Force G was sent to reinforce the Gallipoli Campaign.

It consisted of the 29th Brigade, serving away from its parent 10th Indian Division.

Consisting of three battalions of Ghurkhas and one of Sikhs, the brigade was dispatched from Egypt and attached to the British 29th Division which had been decimated in the earlier battles.

Held in reserve for the Second Battle of Krithia they played a major part in the Third Battle of Krithia. Advancing on the left the Brigade was quickly halted except along the Aegean shore where the 1/6th Gurkha Rifles managed to advance.

The 14th Ferozepore Sikhs, advancing along the floor of Gully Ravine, were almost wiped out, losing 380 men out of 514 and 80% of their officers. The Brigade was next involved in the Battle of Gully Ravine and here the 2/10th Gurkha Rifles managed to advance half a mile.

The Brigade next took part in the Battle of Sari Bair, under cover of a naval bombardment the 1/6th Gurkha Rifles assaulted and captured the hill, which was then shelled by the Royal Navy.

With their casualties mounting and under command of the battalion medical officer they were forced to withdraw to their starting positions.

With the failure of the assault at Sari Bair the brigade was withdrawn to Egypt. Over the duration of the campaign the 29th Brigade had suffered 1,358 dead and 3,421 wounded.

Other operations

Siege of Tsingtao

One Indian Army battalion that was part of the Garrison of Tianjin in China, the 36th Sikhs took part in the Siege of Tsingtao. Tsingtao was a German controlled port in China.

The British Government and the other Allied European powers were concerned about Japanese intentions in the region and decided to send a small symbolic British contingent from Tianjin in an effort to allay their fears.

The 1,500-man contingent was commanded by Brigadier-General Nathaniel Walter Barnardiston and consisted of 1,000 soldiers of the 2nd Battalion, South Wales Borderers who were later followed by 500 soldiers of the 36th Sikhs.

The Japanese led force laid siege to the port between 31 October–7 November 1914.[16][60] At the end of the siege, Japanese army casualties numbered 236 killed and 1,282 wounded; the British / Indians had 12 killed and 53 wounded. The German defenders suffered 199 dead and 504 wounded.

1915 Singapore Mutiny

The 1915 Singapore Mutiny involved up to half of the 850 sepoys comprising the 5th Light Infantry against the British in Singapore during the War, part of the 1915 Ghadar Conspiracy.

The 5th Light Infantry had arrived in Singapore from Madras in October 1914.

They had been sent to replace the Yorkshire Light Infantry, which had been ordered to France.

The 5th Light Infantry consisted of roughly equal numbers of Punjabi Muslims and Pathans serving in separate companies.

Their morale was constantly low, being effected by poor communication, slack discipline and a weak leadership. The regiment had been employed to guard the captured crew from the German ship, SMS Emden and reportedly attempts were made to fan the discontent amongst the sepoys.

The regiment was under orders to embark for further garrison duty in Hong Kong, however rumours started that they were going to be sent to fight in the Middle East against fellow Muslims from the Ottoman Empire.

On 16th February 1915, while preparations for departure were under way, the four companies of Punjabi Muslims mutinied while the Pathan sepoys of the remaining four companies scattered in confusion.

Two of the British officers at the Tanglin barracks were killed and the mutineers then moved on the German prisoner of war camp where they killed thirteen camp guards and other military personnel.

The Germans however refused to join them. The mutineers then roamed the streets of Singapore, killing European civilians that they encountered.

The mutiny continued for nearly five days and was suppressed by local volunteer and British regular units plus naval detachments from allied warships, and with assistance from the Sultan of Johor.

Following immediate courts-martial a total of 47 mutineers were executed, while 64 were transported for life and another 73 imprisoned for varying terms.

Later in 1915 the 5th Light Infantry saw service in the Kamerun Campaign and was subsequently sent to East Africa and Aden.

1918 Malleson Mission

500 men of the 19th Punjabis were deployed by General Wilfrid Malleson in Transcaspia in support of the Ashkhabad Committee, and known as the Malleson Mission. The Ashkhabad Committee was a revolutionary organisation led by Mensheviks and Socialist Revolutionaries who were in an armed conflict with the Bolshevik Tashkent Soviet.

Victoria Cross recipients

Indian soldiers had not been eligible for the Victoria Cross until 1911, instead they received the Indian Order of Merit, an older decoration originally set up in the days of East India Company rule in India.

The honour of being the first Indian recipient of the Victoria Cross (VC) in any conflict went to Khudadad Khan, 129th Duke of Connaught’s Own Baluchis.

When on 31st October 1914, at Hollebeke, Belgium, the British Officer in charge of the detachment having been wounded, and the other gun put out of action by a shell, Sepoy Khudadad, though himself wounded, remained working his gun until all the other five men of the gun detachment had been killed.

Other members of the Indian Army awarded the Victoria Cross during World War I were:

Darwan Singh Negi, 39th Garhwal Rifles
For great gallantry on the night of the 23rd–24th November 1914, near Festubert, France, when the regiment was engaged in retaking and clearing the enemy out of our trenches, and, although wounded in two places in the head, and also in the arm, being one of the first to push round each successive traverse, in the face of severe fire from bombs and rifles at the closest range.

Frank Alexander de Pass, 34th Prince Albert Victor’s Own Poona Horse
For conspicuous bravery near Festubert on 24th November 1914, in entering a German sap and destroying a traverse in the face of the enemy’s bombs, and for subsequently rescuing, under heavy fire, a wounded man who was lying exposed in the open.

William Bruce, 59th Scinde Rifles
On 19th December 1914, near Givenchy, during a night attack, Lt. Bruce was in command of a small party which captured one of the enemy’s trenches. In spite of being severely wounded in the neck, he walked up and down the trench, encouraging his men to hold on against several counter-attacks for some hours until killed. The fire from rifles and bombs was very heavy all day, and it was due to the skilful disposition made, and the example and encouragement shown by Lt. Bruce that his men were able to hold out until dusk, when the trench was finally captured by the enemy.

Eustace Jotham, 51st Sikhs attached North Waziristan Militia
On 7th January 1915, at Spina Khaisora (Tochi Valley) During operations against the Khostwal tribesmen, Captain Jotham, who was commanding a party of about a dozen of the North Waziristan Militia, was attacked in a nullah and almost surrounded by an overwhelming force of some 1,500 tribesmen. He gave the order to retire, and could have himself escaped, but most gallantly sacrificed his own life by attempting to effect the rescue of one of his men who had lost his horse.

Mir Dast, 55th Coke’s Rifles (Frontier Force)
On 26th April 1915, at Wieltje, Belgium, Jemadar Mir Dast led his platoon with great bravery during the attack, and afterwards collected various parties of the regiment (when no British officers were left) and kept them under his command until the retirement was ordered. He also displayed great courage that day when he helped to carry eight British and Indian officers to safety while exposed to heavy fire.

John Smyth 15th Ludhiana Sikhs
For most conspicuous bravery near Richebourg L’Avoue on 18th May 1915. With a bombing party of 10 men, who voluntarily undertook this duty, he conveyed a supply of 96 bombs to within 20 yards of the enemy’s position over exceptionally dangerous ground, after the attempts of two other parties had failed. Lieutenant Smyth succeeded in taking the bombs to the desired position with the aid of two of his men (the other eight having been killed or wounded), and to effect his purpose he had to swim a stream, being exposed the whole time to howitzer, shrapnel, machine-gun and rifle fire.

Kulbir Thapa, 3rd Gurkha Rifles.
On 25th September 1915 in Fauquissart, France, Rifleman Thapa, having been wounded himself, found a wounded soldier of The Leicestershire Regiment behind the first line German trench. Although urged to save himself, the Gurkha stayed with the wounded man all day and night. Early next day, in misty weather, he took him through the German wire and, leaving him in a place of comparative safety, returned and brought in two wounded Gurkhas, one after the other. He then went back, and, in broad daylight, fetched the British soldier, carrying him most of the way under enemy fire.

Lala, 41st Dogras
On 21st January 1916, at El Orah, Mesopotamia, finding a British officer lying close to the enemy, Lance-Naik Lala dragged him into a temporary shelter. After bandaging his wounds, the lance-naik heard calls from his own adjutant who was lying wounded in the open. The enemy was only 100 yards (91 m) away. Lala insisted on going to help. He stripped off his own clothing to keep the wounded officer warm and stayed with him until just before dark when he returned to the shelter. After dark he carried the first wounded officer to safety and then, returning with a stretcher, carried back his adjutant.

John Alexander Sinton, Indian Medical Service
On 21st January 1916, at the Orah Ruins, Mesopotamia, Captain Sinton attended to the wounded under very heavy fire. “For most conspicuous bravery and devotion to duty. Although shot through both arms and through the side, he refused to go to hospital, and remained as long as daylight lasted, attending to his duties under very heavy fire. In three previous actions Captain Sinton displayed the utmost bravery.”

Shahamad Khan, 89th Punjabis
On 12th–13th April 1916 near Beit Ayeesa, Mesopotamia, Naik Shahamad Khan was in charge of a machine-gun covering a gap in our new line within 150 yards of the entrenched enemy. He beat off three counter-attacks and worked his gun single-handed after all his men, except two belt-fillers, had become casualties. For three hours he held the gap under very heavy fire and when his gun was knocked out, he and his two belt-fillers held their ground with rifles until ordered to withdraw. With help he then brought back his gun, ammunition and one severely wounded man, and finally all remaining arms and equipment.

Gobind Singh, 28th Light Cavalry
On the night of 30th November and 1st December 1917, east of Pozières, France, Lance-Dafadar Gobind Singh three times volunteered to carry messages between the regiment and brigade headquarters, a distance of 1.5 miles (2.4 km) over open ground which was under heavy fire from the enemy. He succeeded each time in delivering the message, although on each occasion his horse was shot and he was compelled to finish the journey on foot.

Karanbahadur Rana, 3rd Gurkha Rifles
On 10th April 1918, at El Kefr, Egypt, during an attack, Rifleman Karanbahadur Rana and a few other men crept forward with a Lewis gun under intense fire to engage an enemy machine-gun. No. 1 of the Lewis gun team opened fire but was shot almost immediately, whereupon the rifleman pushed the dead man off the gun, opened fire, knocked out the enemy gun crew and then silenced the fire of the enemy bombers and riflemen in front of him. During the remainder of the day he did magnificent work and finally assisted with covering fire in the withdrawal, until the enemy were close on him.

Badlu Singh, 14th Murray’s Jat Lancers
On 2nd September 1918 on the west bank of the River Jordan, Palestine, when his squadron was charging a strong enemy position, Ressaidar Badlu Singh realised that heavy casualties were being inflicted from a small hill occupied by machine-guns and 200 infantry. Without any hesitation he collected six other ranks and with entire disregard of danger he charged and captured the position. He was mortally wounded on the very top of the hill when capturing one of the machine-guns single handed, but all the guns and infantry had surrendered to him before he died.

Aftermath

In 1919, the Indian Army could call upon 491,000 men, but there was a shortage of experienced officers, most of the officers having been killed or wounded in the war.

In 1921, the Indian government started a review of their military requirements with the protection of the North West Frontier and internal security their priority.

By 1925, the Army in India had been reduced to 197,000 troops, 140,000 of them Indian.

Battalions were now allocated one of three roles: The field army of four infantry divisions and five cavalry brigades; covering troops, 12 infantry brigades and supporting arms to act as a reserve force in case of invasion; and finally internal security troops, 43 infantry battalions to aid the civil power and support the field army when required.

The number of cavalry regiments was reduced from 39 to 21. The infantry regiments were converted into 20 large regiments with four or five battalions in each regiment plus a training battalion, always numbered the 10th, also included were ten Gurkha regiments.

Nine single battalion regiments were disbanded by 1922.

Two of the large regiments were later disbanded, the 3rd Madras Regiment for economic reasons, and the 20th Burma Rifles when Burma ceased to be governed by India.

The end of World War I did not see the end of fighting for the Indian Army—they were involved in the Third Afghan War in 1919, and then the Waziristan Campaign in 1919–1920 and again in 1920–1924.

Operations against the Afridis in 1930–1931, the Mohmands in 1933 and again in 1935 and finally just before the outbreak of World War II operations in Waziristan again in 1936–1939.

The India Gate in New Delhi, built in 1931, commemorates the Indian soldiers who lost their lives fighting in World War I.

Sourced from Wikipedia 

Tobias Martin Ellwood MP

 Articles  Comments Off on Tobias Martin Ellwood MP
Apr 022017
 

 

Tobias Ellwood and others trying to save the life of PC Keith Palmer

22nd March 2017

 

R.I.P

Keith Palmer

Tobias Martin Ellwood PC, MP (born 12th August 1966) is a British Conservative Party politician and author. He served in the Royal Green Jackets and reached the rank of captain.

He currently serves as the Member of Parliament (MP) for Bournemouth East and as UK Government Minister at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

Early life

Born in New York City to British parents, Ellwood was educated at schools in Bonn and Vienna. He attended Loughborough University from 1985–90, graduating with a BA (Hons) degree, and the Cass Business School at City University from 1997–8, where he received a Master of Business Administration degree (MBA).

From an officer cadet, Ellwood was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Territorial Army in 1989, transferring to the Royal Green Jackets in the Regular Army in 1991, with promotion to lieutenant.

He was further promoted to captain in 1995, and transferred from the active list to the Reserve of Officers in 1996. After leaving the Army he became a researcher to the Conservative MP Tom King. He was elected Chairman of the Hertfordshire South West Conservative Association for a year in 1998, and has been a senior business manager with the London Stock Exchange since 1999.

Parliamentary career

Ellwood was elected as a Councillor of Dacorum Borough Council in Hertfordshire in 1999, and unsuccessfully contested the parliamentary seat of Worsley in Manchester at the 2001 general election being defeated by the sitting Labour MP Terry Lewis by 11,787 votes.

He achieved success at the 2005 general election, when selected to contest the safe Conservative seat of Bournemouth East to succeed the outgoing David Atkinson MP. Ellwood held Bournemouth East with a majority of 5,244 votes and remains the MP there. He made his maiden speech in the House of Commons on 19 May 2005.?

A vocal supporter of David Cameron’s campaign for the leadership of the Conservative Party, Ellwood was appointed to the Opposition Whips Office in December 2005. In the July 2007 reshuffle, Cameron promoted Ellwood to his frontbench team as Shadow Minister for Culture, Media and Sport, with specific responsibilities for gambling, licensing and tourism.

Ellwood has since stated that these responsibilities are also of specific interest to his Bournemouth constituents, a town of seaside tourism, numerous bars and nightclubs, and the site of a proposed casino development.?
He was criticised in the press after reportedly branding Liverpudlian landlords taking over pubs in his constituency as “criminals” in 2009. Ellwood claimed the comments had been taken out of context.

Following his return to Parliament in 2010, he was appointed Parliamentary Private Secretary (PPS) to then Defence Secretary, Dr Liam Fox, and in October 2011 was appointed PPS to David Lidington MP, Minister for Europe at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

In October 2013 Ellwood was appointed PPS to Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt MP.

On 15th July 2014 Ellwood was appointed as Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

In 2011 Ellwood was reported as saying “He should be given a good hiding behind the bike shed”, referring to the Conservative party rebel Mark Pritchard. He later claimed he was joking.

In 2010 Ellwood was threatened with arrest outside the House of Commons by the police after confronting them over an anti-war protestor.

Ellwood has also been appointed a Member of the Parliamentary Delegation to the NATO Assembly, 2014 and Parliamentary Advisor to the Prime Minister for the 2014 NATO Summit. He is a proponent of “double summer time”.

In 2011, Ellwood served on the Special Select Committee set up to scrutinise the Bill which became the Armed Forces Act 2011. He was also a member of the Public Bill Committee for the Defence Reform Act 2014.

In May 2014 he was one of seven unsuccessful candidates for the chairmanship of the House of Commons Defence Select Committee.

In 2015, he flouted public opinion and backed the move by IPSA to increase salaries for politicians by 10% when the rest of the public sector are on a freeze of 1%. He said he was left “counting the pennies”.

In September 2015, the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority named Ellwood and 26 current and former MPs who failed to settle sums of up to £500 the previous year in overclaimed expenses, forcing them to be written off.

On 22nd March 2017, during a terrorist attack on Parliament, Ellwood gave mouth-to-mouth resuscitation and CPR to police officer Keith Palmer, who later died of his injuries.Ellwood was called a “hero” by those at Westminster and the press, as photos surfaced of him with blood on his face while he crouched over the body of the dying police officer.

Consequently, Ellwood received a lot of praise on social media for his actions, as well as being promised an appointment to the Privy Council for his response in the attack.

Publications

Ellwood has written the following recent publications:

Upgrading UK influence in the European Union – A strategy to improve upstream scrutiny of EU legislation (November 2012)

Time to Change the Clocks – Arguing the case for moving our clocks forward (November 2010)-
Post Conflict Reconstruction – Bridging the gap between Military and Civilian Affairs on the Modern Battlefield (November 2009)

Stabilizing Afghanistan: Proposals for Improving Security, Governance, and Aid/Economic Development – Atlantic Council (April 2013)

Leveraging UK Carrier Capability (September 2013)

Improving Efficiency, Interoperability and Resilience of our Blue Light Services (December 2013)

Personal life

In July 2005, Ellwood married Hannah Ryan, a corporate lawyer, in East Yorkshire. He has a sister, Charlotte Ellwood-Aris. His brother, Jonathan, who was director of studies at the International School Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam, was killed in the 2002 Bali bombing.

In June 2009 Ellwood was beaten by a gang of youths after confronting them for playing football in the street.

Sourced from Wikipedia 

 

WWI Battle Timeline

 Articles  Comments Off on WWI Battle Timeline
Mar 172017
 

1914

August

1st August-Battle of Mons

2nd August-Battle of Jenny

5th August-Battle of Liège

7th August-Battle of the Frontiers

9th August-Togoland Campaign

15th August-Battle of Cer

26th August-Battle of Tannenberg

September

5th Sept-First Battle of the Marne

6th Sept-Battle of Drina

October

19th Oct-Battle of Ypres

31st Oct-Siege of Tsingtao

November

3rd Nov-Battle of Kilimanjaro

3rd Nov-Battle of Tanga

16th Nov-Battle of Kolubara

December

1st Dec-Battle of Limanowa

8th Dec-Battle of the Falkland Islands

20th Dec-First Battle of Champagne

1915

January

18th Jan-Battle of Jassin

February

3rd Feb-Defense of the Suez Badick

7th Feb-Second Battle of the Masurian Lakes

19th Feb-Dardanelles Bombardment

March

10th March-Battle of Neuve Chapelle

April

12th April-Battle of Shaiba

22st April-Battle of Gravenstafel (part of Second Battle of Ypres)

24th April-Battle of St Juliaan (part of Second Battle of Ypres)

25th April-Anzac Cove

25th April-Landing at Cape Helles

28th April-First Battle of Krithia

May

1st May-Eski Hissarlik

6th May-Second Battle of Krithia

8th May-Battle of Frezenberg (part of Second Battle of Ypres)

15th May-Battle of Festubert

19th May-Turkish attack at Anzac Cove

24th May-Battle of Bellewaarde (final part of Second Battle of Ypres )

31st May-Capture of Amara

June

4th June-Third Battle of Krithia

18th June-Attempt to Force the Narrows

23rd June-First Battle of the Isonzo

27th June-Battle of Nasiriyeh

28th June-Battle of Gully Ravine

July

12th July-Attack on Ache Baba

18th July-Second Battle of the Isonzo

August

6th Aug-Suvla Bay

6th Aug-Battle of Lone Pine

6th Aug-Battle of Sari Bair

6th Aug-Battle of the Nek

17th Aug-Great Retreat (Russian)

21st Aug-Battle of Hill 60

21st Aug-Battle of Scimitar Hill

September

25th Sept-Third Battle of Artois

25th Sept-Battle of Loos

25th Sept-Second Battle of Champagne

28th Sept-Battle of Es Sinn

October

14th Oct-Morava Offensive

14th Oct-Ovče Pole Offensive

18th Oct-Third Battle of the Isonzo

November

10th Nov-Fourth Battle of the Isonzo

10th Nov-Kosovo Offensive (1915)

22nd Nov-Battle of Ctesiphon

December

7th Dec-Siege of Kut-al-Amara

18th Dec-Evacuation of Gallipoli

1916

January

5th Jan-Montenegrin Campaign of World War I

6th Jan-Battle of Mojkovac

6th Jan-Battle of Sheikh Sa’ad

10th Jan-Battle of Koprukoy

13th Jan-Battle of the Wadi

21st Jan-Battle of Hanna

February

21st Feb-Battle of Verdun

March

8th March-Battle of Dujaila

9th March-Fifth Battle of the Isonzo

18th March-Battle of Lake Naroch

April

5th April-First Battle of Kut

May

15th May-Battle of Asiago

15th May-Trentino Offensive

31st May-Battle of Jutland

June

4th June-Battle of Lutsk

4th June-Battle of Khanaqin

July

1st July-Battle of the Somme

14th July-Battle of Bazentin Ridge

15th July-Battle of Delville Wood

15th July-Battle of Fromelles

23rd July-Battle of Pozières

August

3rd Aug-Battle of Romani

6th Aug-Sixth Battle of the Isonzo

6th Aug-Battle of Gorizia

September

3rd Sept-Battle of Guillemont

14th Sept-Seventh Battle of the Isonzo

15th Sept-Battle of Flers-Courcelette

October

10th Oct-Eighth Battle of the Isonzo

November

1st Nov-Ninth Battle of the Isonzo

December

14th Dec-Battle of Magdhaba

13th Dec Second Battle of Kut

1917

January

9th Jan-Battle of Khadairi Bend

February

26th Feb-Battle of Nahr-alKalek

March

11th March-Capture of Baghdad

13th March-Samarrah Offensive

19th March-Seizure of Falluja

25th March-Battle of Mount Hamrin

26th March-First Battle of Gaza

April

9th April-Second Battle of Arras

11th April-First Battle of Bullecourt

22nd April-Battle of Doiran (1917)

May

3rd-11th May-Second Battle of Bullecourt

12th May-Tenth Battle of the Isonzo

14th May-Battle of Otranto Straits

June

7th June-Battle of Messines

July

31st July-Third Battle of Ypres

31st July-Battle of Passchendaele

August

19th Aug-Eleventh Battle of the Isonzo

20th Aug-Battle of Liege

September

28th Sept-Battle of Ramadi

October

24th Oct-Twelfth Battle of the Isonzo

24th Oct-Battle of Caporetto

31st Oct-Third Battle of Gaza

31st Oct-Battle of Beersheba (Palestine)

November

5th Nov-Capture of Tikrit

13th Nov-Battle of Mughar Ridge

20th Nov-Battle of Cambrai

December

8th Dec-Fall of Jerusalem

1918

March

21st March-Second Battle of Somme/Operation Michael

April

9th April-Battle of the Lys/Operation Georgette

23rd April-Raid on Zeebrugge

May
27th May-Third Battle of the Aisne/Operation Blücher-Yorck

28th May-Battle of Cantigny

June

1st June-Battle of Belleau Wood

18th June-Battle of Chateau-Thierry

15th June-Battle of the Piave River

18th June-Action of 18 June 1918

July

4th July-Battle of Hamel

14th July-Battle of Abu Tellul

15th July-Second Battle of the Marne

18th July-Battle of Soissons

21st July-Attack on Orleans

August

8th August-Battle of Amiens

27th August-Battle of Ambos Nogales

31st August-Battle of Mont St. Quentin

September

12th Sept-Battle of Havrincourt

12th Sept-Battle of Saint-Mihiel

18th Sept-Battle of Epehy

19th Sept-Battle of Megiddo

26th Sept-Battle of the Argonne Forest

27th Sept-Battle of the Canal du Nord

29th Sept-Battle of St. Quentin Canal

October

8th Oct-Battle of Cambrai

17th Oct-Battle of the Selle

23rd Oct-Battle of Vittorio Veneto

23rd Oct-Battle of Sharqat

November

4th Nov-Second Battle of the Sambre

Sourced from Wikipedia

Dame Vera lynn

 Articles  Comments Off on Dame Vera lynn
Mar 172017
 

Memorial at Peninsula Ltd

Would like to wish 

Dame Vera Lynn

A Very Happy 100th Birthday  

20th March 2017

Dame Vera Margaret Lynn CH DBE OStJ (née Welch; born 20th March 1917), widely known as “the Forces’ Sweetheart”, is an English singer, songwriter and actress. Her musical recordings and performances were enormously popular during the Second World War.

During the war she toured Egypt, India, and Burma as part of ENSA, giving outdoor concerts for the troops. The songs most associated with her are “We’ll Meet Again”, “The White Cliffs of Dover”, “A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square” and “There’ll Always Be an England”.

She remained popular after the war, appearing on radio and television in the UK and the US and recording such hits as “Auf Wiederseh’n Sweetheart” and her UK Number one single “My Son, My Son”. Her last single, “I Love This Land”, was released to mark the end of the Falklands War. In 2009, at age 92, she became the oldest living artist to top the UK Albums Chart.

She has devoted much time and energy to charity work connected with ex-servicemen, disabled children, and breast cancer. She is held in great affection by veterans of the Second World War to this day and in 2000 was named the Briton who best exemplified the spirit of the 20th century.

Vera Margaret Welch was born in East Ham, Essex on 20th March 1917, to parents Bertram Samuel Welch (1883–1955) and Annie Martin (c. 1889–1961), who had married in 1913.

She began performing publicly at the age of seven and adopted her maternal grandmother’s maiden name, Margaret Lynn, as her stage name when she was eleven. Her first radio broadcast, with the Joe Loss Orchestra, was in 1935. At this point she was being featured on records released by dance bands including those of Loss and of Charlie Kunz.

In 1936 her first solo record was released on the Crown label, “Up the Wooden Hill to Bedfordshire”. This label was absorbed by Decca Records in 1938. After a short stint with Loss she stayed with Kunz for a few years during which she recorded several standard musical pieces. In 1937 she moved to the aristocrat of British dance bands, Bert Ambrose.

She is best known for her 1939 recording of the popular song “We’ll Meet Again”, written by Ross Parker and Hughie Charles; the nostalgic lyrics (“We’ll meet again, don’t know where, don’t know when, but I know we’ll meet again some sunny day”) were very popular during the war and made the song one of its emblematic hits.

During the Phoney War, the Daily Express asked British servicemen to name their favourite musical performers: Vera Lynn came out on top and as a result became known as “the Forces’ Sweetheart”.

In 1941, during the darkest days of the Second World War, Lynn began her own radio programme, Sincerely Yours, sending messages to British troops serving abroad. She and her quartet performed songs most requested by the soldiers.
Lynn also visited hospitals to interview new mothers and send personal messages to their husbands overseas. Her other great wartime hit was “The White Cliffs of Dover”, words by Nat Burton, music by Walter Kent.

In 1943 she appeared in the film We’ll Meet Again. Contrary to later reports, she neither sang nor recorded “Rose of England” during this time and it was only in 1966 when her producer, David Gooch, selected it for her album More Hits of the Blitz that she became familiar with it. The album itself was a follow-up to Hits of the Blitz produced by Norman Newell.

During the war years she joined ENSA and toured Egypt, India and Burma, giving outdoor concerts for the troops.

In March 1944 she went to Shamshernagar airfield in Bengal to entertain the troops before the Battle of Kohima. Her host and lifelong friend Captain Bernard Holden recalled “her courage and her contribution to morale”.

In 1985 it was announced that she would receive the Burma Star for entertaining British guerrilla units in Japanese-occupied Burma.

Lynn’s “Auf Wiederseh’n Sweetheart” in 1952 became the first record by a British performer to top the charts in the United States, remaining there for nine weeks.

She also appeared regularly for a time on Tallulah Bankhead’s US radio programme The Big Show. “Auf Wiederseh’n Sweetheart”, along with “The Homing Waltz” and “Forget-Me-Not”, gave Lynn a remarkable three entries on the first UK Singles Chart, a top 12 (which actually contained 15 songs owing to tied positions).

Her popularity continued in the 1950s, peaking with “My Son, My Son”, a number-one hit in 1954 which she co-wrote with Gordon Melville Rees. In 1960 she left Decca Records (after nearly 25 years) and joined EMI.

She recorded for EMI’s Columbia, MGM and HMV labels. She also recorded Lionel Bart’s song “The Day After Tomorrow” for the 1962 musical Blitz!; she did not appear onstage in the play, but the characters in the play hear the song on the radio while they shelter from the bombs.

In 1967 she recorded “It Hurts To Say Goodbye”, a song which hit the top 10 on the Billboard Easy Listening chart.

Vera Lynn was the subject of This Is Your Life on two occasions, in October 1957 when she was surprised by Eamonn Andrews at the BBC Television Theatre, and in December 1978, for an episode which was broadcast on 1st January 1979, when Andrews surprised her at the Cafe Royal, London.

She hosted her own variety series on BBC1 in the late 1960s and early 1970s and was a frequent guest on other variety shows, notably the 1972 Morecambe & Wise Christmas Show.

In 1972 she was a key performer in the BBC anniversary programme Fifty Years of Music. In 1976 she hosted the BBC’s A Jubilee of Music, celebrating the pop music hits of the period 1952–1976 to commemorate the start of Queen Elizabeth II’s Silver Jubilee year.

For ITV she presented a 1977 TV special to launch her album Vera Lynn in Nashville, which included pop songs of the 1960s and country songs.

The Royal Variety Performance included appearances by Vera Lynn on four occasions: 1960, 1975, 1986 and 1990.
Lynn was also interviewed about her role in entertaining the troops in the India-Burma Theatre, for The World at War series in 1974.

Lynn is also notable for being the only artist to have a chart span on the British single and album charts reaching from the chart’s inception to the 21st century – in 1952 having three singles in the first ever singles chart, compiled by New Musical Express,and most recently having a No. 1 album with We’ll Meet Again – The Very Best of Vera Lynn.

Honours

Lynn was awarded the British War Medal 1939–1945 and the Burma Star.

She was appointed Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) in the 1969 New Year Honours “for services to the Royal Air Forces Association and other charities”, and was advanced to Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire (DBE) in the 1975 Birthday Honours for charitable services.

She was made an Officer of the Order of Saint John (OStJ) in 1998 and, in 2000, Lynn received a special “Spirit of the 20th Century” Award. A street named in her honour, Vera Lynn Close, is situated in Forest Gate, London.

A preserved example of the WD Austerity 2-10-0 class of steam locomotives at the North Yorkshire Moors Railway is named Dame Vera Lynn.

The 1964 film Dr. Strangelove directed by Stanley Kubrick, starring Peter Sellers and George C. Scott ends with a montage of Atomic and Nuclear explosions accompanying Vera Lynn’s song We’ll Meet Again.

In 1979, on their album The Wall, Pink Floyd released a song titled “Vera”, referencing Vera Lynn and the song We’ll Meet Again with the lyrics “Does anybody here remember Vera Lynn? / Remember how she said that / We would meet again / Some sunny day?”.

In 1976 she received an honorary doctorate from the Memorial University of Newfoundland.[33] In 1977 She was made an honorary citizen of Nashville, Tennessee. She received the Freedom of the City of London in 1978.

She was made a Commander of the Order of Orange-Nassau in 1985. ?

She was appointed Member of the Order of the Companions of Honour (CH) in the 2016 Birthday Honours for services to entertainment and charity.

Charity Work

In 1953 Lynn formed the cerebral palsy charity SOS (The Stars Organisation for Spastics) and became its chairperson.

The Vera Lynn Charity Breast Cancer Research Trust was founded in 1976, with Lynn its chairperson and later its president.

In 2002 Lynn became president of the cerebral palsy charity The Dame Vera Lynn Trust for Children with Cerebral Palsy, and hosted a celebrity concert on its behalf at Queen Elizabeth Hall in London.
In 2008 Lynn became patron of the charitable Forces Literary Organisation Worldwide for ALL,

In 2010 Lynn became the patron of the Dover War Memorial Project, In 2010 she became patron of the British charity Projects to Support Refugees from Burma/Help 4 Forgotten Allies.

In 2013 Lynn joined a PETA campaign against pigeon racing, stating that the sport was “utterly cruel.”

Later years

Lynn sang outside Buckingham Palace in 1995 in a ceremony that marked the golden jubilee of VE Day. This was her last known public performance.

The United Kingdom’s VE Day Diamond Jubilee ceremonies in 2005 included a concert in Trafalgar Square, London, in which Lynn made an unannounced appearance.

She made a speech praising the veterans and calling upon the younger generation always to remember their sacrifice, and joined in with a few bars of “We’ll Meet Again”. Following that year’s Royal British Legion Festival of Remembrance Lynn encouraged the Welsh singer Katherine Jenkins to assume the mantle of “Forces’ Sweetheart”.

In her speech Lynn said: “These boys gave their lives and some came home badly injured, and for some families life would never be the same. We should always remember, we should never forget, and we should teach the children to remember.”?

In September 2008 Lynn helped launch a new social history recording website, “The Times of My Life”, at the Cabinet War Rooms in London.

Lynn published her autobiography, Some Sunny Day, in 2009. She had written two previous memoirs: Vocal Refrain (1975) and We’ll Meet Again (1989).

In February 2009 it was reported that Lynn was suing the British National Party (BNP) for using “the White Cliffs of Dover” on an anti-immigration album without her permission. Her lawyer claimed the album seemed to link Lynn, who does not align with any political party, to the party’s views by association.

In September 2009, at the age of 92, Lynn became the oldest living artist to make it to number 1 in the British album chart.
Her compilation album We’ll Meet Again: The Very Best of Vera Lynn entered the chart at number 20 on 30 August, and then climbed to number 2 the following week before reaching the top position, outselling both the Arctic Monkeys and the Beatles.

In August 2014 Lynn was one of 200 public figures who were signatories to a letter to The Guardian opposing Scottish independence in the run-up to September’s referendum on that issue.
In May 2015 she was unable to attend VE Day 70: A Party to Remember, in London but was interviewed at home by the Daily Mirror.

In February 2017 it was announced that Lynn would be releasing a new LP entitled Vera Lynn 100 through Decca Records, to be released three days before her 100th birthday on 17th March 2017.

The album, featuring Lynn’s original vocals set to new re-orchestrated versions of her songs, will also feature several duet partners including Alfie Boe, Alexander Armstrong, Aled Jones and the RAF Squadronaires.

Parlophone Records, which owns Lynn’s later recordings from the 1960s and 1970s, will release a collection of her songs recorded at Abbey Road Studios entitled Her Greatest from Abbey Road on 10th March 2017, featuring five previously unreleased original recordings.

Lynn currently holds the record for being the oldest UK artist to get a top 20 album at the age of 97.

Sourced from Wikipedia and You-Tube

MAJOR SHARPE’ S APPOINTMENTS FOR THE DAY

 Articles  Comments Off on MAJOR SHARPE’ S APPOINTMENTS FOR THE DAY
Mar 062017
 

“MAJOR SHARPE’ S APPOINTMENTS FOR THE DAY”

Reveille at four in the morning, a battle ere the day’s done

A casualty list for reportin’—Army life’s not so much fun.

At seven, a meetin’ with Wellington, to work out an offensive plan

Or a siege that could win my promotion—not bad for a bastard, homeless man

After that it’s paradin’ o’ privates, then polish me gun an’ me sword

I’m not be of wealth or education, but a better soldier than any young Lord

An ambush comes next in the noon hour, with troops that I’ve just taught to fight

Couldn’t shoot for their lives or a farthing…but I think they’ve about got it right.

By Two, its all gunsmoke an’ screamin’: by three, we lead ‘em out, me an’ Pat

By four, a hundred dead soldiers, given by Nosey no more thought than a rat

At Five, I should celebrate with officers, but they’re Gents—they don’t want me around

Cos they only need me f’ battles, when my bravery c’n earn ‘em a pound

So I’ll spend all my time with the Rifles, with South Essex whose name that we made

And I’ll spend my nights dreamin’ of Eagles

Countin’ red-jacket sheep on parade.

Written by Farren M Robinson, (as a teenager)

 

Philip Pickford the Artist

 Articles  Comments Off on Philip Pickford the Artist
Mar 062017
 

Memorial at Peninsula are pleased to announce former Rifleman 

Philip Pickford the Artist

Former Rifleman Philip Pickford

(Artist and Poet)

After his visit to The WWI Battle Fields in Belgium, he was greatly moved and this inspired him. 

From his Studio in sunny Salford former Rifleman Philip Pickford (Poet and now Artist) has painted many abstract paintings of his interpretation of The Somme and Flanders.

All of the Paintings are for sale, if you wish to make Philip an offer please contact him by this email link 

Philippickford@icloud.com

Over The Top 2

______________________

Over the Top 1

_____________________

Black Mafia

_______________________

Gommecourt wood 1st July 1916

_____________________________

“Vimy Ridge”..12th April 1917

______________________________

“Fixed Bayonets”

______________________________

Nurses At The Front….Ypres Salient.

___________________________

“Great Coats”

This one is sold

_________________________

“Survivor”

_______________________

“Moving To The “Start Line”

______________________

For more of Philips Art work and how to buy please visit

 Kind permission of Philip Pickford

William Peniston (Military Medal)

 Articles  Comments Off on William Peniston (Military Medal)
Feb 212017
 

William Peniston, seen here aged 27, won Military Medal during fight for Delville Wood,
He won the Distinguished Conduct Medal for his bravery at Woodlane
Medals for valour, as well as his service medals.

As a stretcher bearer at the Battle of the Somme, Lance Corporal William Peniston was kept horribly busy – but it seems he never lost his nerve.

The First World War confrontation raged for five months, and left 95,000 British and Commonwealth soldiers dead, with another 325,000 injured. Little territory was won.

Yet only now is the remarkable story of L/Cpl Peniston’s bravery under fire during the battle emerging – as three medals he won in only three weeks on the Somme are put up for auction.
The battle, on the Western Front in France, began on July 1st, 1916, with Britain suffering almost 60,000 casualties on the first day alone, a third of them killed.

On August 26, L/Cpl Peniston, then 27, won his first decoration of the battle, the Military Medal, during the fight for Delville Wood.

On September 11th, he won the Distinguished Conduct Medal – ranked immediately below Britain’s highest honour for valour, the Victoria Cross – for his bravery at Woodlane.

His official commendation for the decoration said: ‘For conspicuous gallantry and devotion to duty during an action.

‘His company came under enemy barrage fire which caused considerable casualties, and he remained behind under heavy shelling attending to the wounded, and helped to carry them to the aid post. He undoubtedly saved the lives of many seriously wounded cases by his prompt action, and set a fine example to the stretcher bearers under him.’

And four days after that remarkable display of courage, L/Cpl Peniston secured his third medal in as many weeks at the Somme by again being awarded the Military Medal for his bravery in continuing his duties during the fighting at Flers-Courcelette.

This was marked by a bar being added to the Military Medal he had won three weeks before.

He went on to be awarded a third Military Medal in 1918, which was again marked with a bar.

L/Cpl Peniston, who was born in Sheffield in 1889, had worked as a miner at Thoresby colliery in Nottinghamshire before the war and resumed that job after it ended.

When he joined the 9th Battalion, King’s Royal Rifle Corps, he was a natural choice to serve as a stretcher bearer throughout the four-year war because beforehand he had volunteered as a corporal in the St John Ambulance Brigade.

By the end of the war L/Cpl Peniston seems to have been a German prisoner of war, but full details of his capture are not clear.

He lived in Edwinstowe, Nottinghamshire, for many years, dying there in 1974 aged 85.

His medals for valour, along with the hero’s service medals, photographs, and letters, are being auctioned together with an estimate of £10,000. They part of a sale being held by London auctioneers Dix Noonan Webb in Mayfair on March 1st and 2nd.

A spokesman for the firm said: ‘Few could equal his astonishing achievement in winning three of his four gallantry awards in the space of a month.

The Royal Green Jackets (Rifles) Museum

failed to secure the Medals, by being outbid 

`By the end of the First World War he was one of just 184 men to win the Military Medal three times.’

William Peniston was a stretcher bearer with 9th Battalion King’s Royal Rifle Corps (KRRC) in WW1.

A remarkably brave man; he was awarded a Distinguished Conduct Medal, Military Medal and bar in the space of one month for rescuing wounded men under fire during the 1916 Somme battles. The citation for his Distinguished Conduct Medal reads:

A/2273 L./Cpl. W. Peniston, K.R.R.C. (Doncaster). For conspicuous gallantry and devotion to duty during action. His company came under enemy barrage fire which caused considerable casualties, and he remained behind under heavy shelling, attending to the wounded, and helped to carry them to the aid post. He undoubtedly saved the lives of many seriously wounded cases by his prompt action, and set a fine example to the stretcher-bearers under him.

Peniston was awarded the Military Medal three times, the first gazetted on 16th November 1916, the first bar on 1st June 1917 and the second on 23rd February 1918.

The Battle of Delville Wood (15th July – 3rd September 1916) was a series of engagements in the 1916 Battle of the Somme in the First World War, between the armies of the German Empire and the British Empire. Delville Wood (Bois d’Elville), was a thick tangle of trees, chiefly beech and hornbeam (the wood has been replanted with oak and birch by the South African government), with dense hazel thickets, intersected by grassy rides, to the east of Longueval.

As part of a general offensive starting on 14th July, which became known as the Battle of Bazentin Ridge (14th–17th July), General Douglas Haig, Commander of the British Expeditionary Force, intended to capture the German second position between Delville Wood and Bazentin le Petit.

The attack achieved this objective and was a considerable though costly success. British attacks and German counter-attacks on the wood continued for the next seven weeks, until just before the Battle of Flers–Courcelette (15th–17th September), the third British general attack in the Battle of the Somme. The 1st South African Infantry Brigade made its Western Front début as part of the 9th (Scottish) Division and captured Delville Wood on 15th July.

The South Africans held the wood until 19 July, at a cost in casualties similar to those of many British brigades on 1st July. When captured, the village and wood formed a salient, which could be fired on by German artillery from three sides. The ground rose from Bernafay and Trônes woods, to the middle of the village and neither the village or the wood could be held without the other.

After the Battle of Bazentin Ridge, the British tried to advance on both flanks to straighten the salient at Delville Wood, to reach good jumping off positions for a general attack. The Germans tried to eliminate the salient and to retain the ground, which shielded German positions from view and overlooked British positions. For the rest of July and August, both sides fought for control of the wood and village but struggled to maintain the tempo of operations.

Wet weather reduced visibility and made the movement of troops and supplies much more difficult; ammunition shortages and high casualties reduced both sides to piecemeal attacks and piecemeal defence on narrow fronts, except for a small number of bigger and wider-front attacks.

Most attacks were defeated by defensive fire power and the effects of inclement weather, which frequently turned the battlefield into a slough of mud. Delville Wood is well preserved with the remains of trenches, a museum and a monument to the South African Brigade at the Delville Wood South African National Memorial.

In 1916, the Franco-British had absorbed the lessons of the failed breakthrough offensives of 1915 and abandoned attempts to break the German front in a sudden attack, as the increased depth of German defences had made this impossible. Attacks were to be limited, conducted over a wide front, preceded by artillery “preparation” and made by fresh troops. Grignotage (nibbling) was expected to lead to the “crumbling” of German defences.

The offensive was split between British and Dominion forces in the north (from Gommecourt to Maricourt) and the French in the south (from the River Somme to the village of Frey). After two weeks of battle, the German defenders were holding firm in the north and centre of the British sector, where the advance had stopped except for the battles for Ovillers and Contalmaison. There had been substantial Entente gains from the Albert–Bapaume road southwards.

The British attacks after 1st July and the rapid French advance on the south bank, led Falkenhayn on 2nd July, to order that

… the first principle in position warfare must be to yield not one foot of ground and if it be lost to retake it by immediate counter-attack, even to the use of the last man.

and next day, General Fritz von Below issued an order of the day forbidding voluntary withdrawals,

The outcome of the war depends on the Second Army being victorious on the Somme…. The enemy must be made to pick his way forward over corpses.

after his Chief of Staff General Paul Grünert and the corps commander General Günther von Pannewitz, were sacked for ordering the XVII Corps to withdraw to the third position. Falkenhayn ordered a “strict defensive” at Verdun on 12th July and the transfer of more troops and artillery to the Somme front, which was the first strategic success of the Anglo-French offensive.

By the end of July, finding reserves for the German defence of the Somme, caused serious difficulties for Falkenhayn, who ordered an attack at Verdun intended to pin down French troops.

The Brusilov Offensive continued and the German eastern armies had to take over more of the front from the Austro-Hungarians when Brody fell on 28th July, to cover Lemberg. Russian attacks were imminent along the Stochod river, the Austro-Hungarian armies were in a state of disarray and Conrad von Hötzendorf the Austro-Hungarian Chief of the General Staff, was reluctant to take troops from the Italian front, when the Italian army was preparing the Sixth Battle of the Isonzo, which began on 6th August.

Strategic developments

On the 19th July, the German 2nd Army was split and a new 1st Army was established, to command the German divisions north of the Somme. The 2nd Army kept the south bank, under General Max von Gallwitz, transferred from Verdun, who was also made commander of armeegruppe Gallwitz-Somme with authority over Below and the 1st Army. Lossberg remained as the 1st Army Chief of Staff and Bronsart von Schellendorff took over for the 2nd Army.

Schellendorff advocated a counter-offensive on the south bank, which was rejected by Falkenhayn, because forces released from the Verdun front were insufficient, five divisions having been sent to the Russian Front in July. On 21st July, Falkenhayn ruled that no more divisions could be removed from quiet fronts for the Somme until exhausted divisions relieved them and that he needed seven “fought out” divisions to replace those already sent to the Somme front.

Gallwitz began to reorganise the artillery and curtailed harassing and retaliatory fire, to conserve ammunition for defensive fire during Anglo-French attacks. From 16th–22nd July, 32 heavy gun and howitzer batteries arrived on the Somme and five reconnaissance flights, three artillery flights, three bombing flights and two fighter squadrons reached the area.

Since 1st July, thirteen fresh divisions had arrived on the north bank of the Somme and three more were ready to join the defence.

The strain on the German defenders on the Somme grew worse in August and unit histories made frequent reference to high losses and companies being reduced to eighty men before relief. Many German divisions came out of a period on the Somme front with at least 4,500 casualties and some German commanders suggested a change to the policy of unyielding defence. The front line was lightly held, with reserves further back in a defensive zone but this had little effect on the losses caused by the Anglo-French artillery.

Movement behind the German front was so dangerous, that regiments carried rations and water for a four- to five-day tour with them. Behind the line, construction work on new rear lines was constant, despite shortages of materials and rail lines becoming overloaded with troop trains. Supply trains were delayed and stations near the front were bombarded by artillery and by aircraft. The local light railways were insufficient and lorries and carts were pressed into use, using roads which while paved, needed constant maintenance, which was difficult to ensure with the troops available.

The German artillery suffered many losses and the number of damaged guns exceeded the repair capacity of workshops behind the front. Inferior ammunition exploded prematurely, bursting gun barrels. Destruction, wear and tear from 26th June – 28th August, led to 1,068 of the 1,208 field guns and 371 of the 820 heavy guns in the armeegruppe being lost.

The Anglo-French maintained air superiority but German air reinforcements began to arrive by mid-July. More artillery was sent to the Somme but until the reorganisation and centralisation of artillery control had been completed, counter-battery fire, barrage-fire and co-operation with aircraft remained inadequate.

Gallwitz considered plans for the relief attack but lack of troops and ammunition made it impractical, particularly after 15th July, when Falkenhayn withheld more fresh divisions and the 1st Army had to rely on the 2nd Army for reinforcements. In early August, an attempt was made to use Landsturm men over 38 years old, who proved a danger to themselves and were withdrawn.

British offensive preparations

British attacks south of the road between Albert and Bapaume began on 2nd July, despite congested supply routes to the French XX Corps and the British XIII, XV and III Corps. La Boisselle near the road was captured on 4th July, Bernafay and Caterpillar woods were occupied from 3rd–4th July and then fighting to capture Trônes Wood, Mametz Wood and Contalmaison took place until early on 14th July.

As German reinforcements reached the Somme front, they were thrown into battle piecemeal and had many casualties. Both sides were reduced to improvised operations, which were hurried and poorly organised. Troops who were unfamiliar with the ground had little time for reconnaissance and were supported by artillery which was poorly co-ordinated with the infantry and sometimes fired on ground occupied by friendly troops.

British attacks in this period have been criticised as uncoordinated, tactically crude and wasteful of manpower, which gave the Germans an opportunity to concentrate their inferior resources on narrow fronts.

The Battle of Bazentin Ridge (14th–17th July) was planned as a joint attack by XV and XIII Corps, whose troops would assemble in no man’s land in darkness and attack at dawn after a five-minute hurricane bombardment.

Haig was sceptical of the plan but eventually accepted the views of Rawlinson and the corps commanders, Lieutenant-General Henry Horne and Lieutenant-General Walter Congreve. Preparatory artillery bombardments began on 11th July and on the night of 13th and 14th July, British troops advanced stealthily across no man’s land, which in parts was 1,200 yards (1,100 m) wide, to within 300–500 yards (270–460 m) of the German front line and then crept forward. At 3:20 a.m., the hurricane bombardment began and the British began to run forward.

On the right flank, the 18th (Eastern) Division (Major-General Ivor Maxse), captured Trônes Wood in a subsidiary operation and the 9th (Scottish) Division (Major-General William Furse) was repulsed from Waterlot Farm but on the left got into Delville Wood. The 21st, 7th and 3rd Division on the left (northern) flank, took most of their objectives. By mid-morning 6,000 yards (5,500 m) of the German second position had been captured, cavalry had been sent forward and the German defenders thrown into chaos.

The village of Longueval enclosed a cross-roads which ran south-west to Montauban, west to the two Bazentins, north to Flers and east to Ginchy.

South African forces used the English place names in Longueval and Delville Wood, as they were more meaningful than French terms. Pall Mall led north from Montauban and Bernafay Wood, to the cross-roads on the southern fringe of the village, where Sloan Street branched to the west, to a junction with Clarges Street and Pont Street.
Dover Street led to the south-east and met a track running north from Trônes Wood.

Two roads converged on Pall Mall at the main square; North Road ran between Flers and High Wood, with a path to the west meeting Pont Street, which ran into High Wood and the second road ran south-east to Guillemont. Clarges Street ran west from the village square to Bazentin le Grand and Prince’s Street ran east through the middle of Delville Wood.

Parallel to Clarges Street, about 300 yards (270 m) further north, ran Duke Street, both bounded on the west by Pont Street and by Piccadilly on the east side.

Orchards lay between Piccadilly and North Street, beyond which Flers Road forked to the right, skirting the north-west edge of Delville Wood. The wood lay north of the D20 road, west of Ginchy and the north-west edge was adjacent to the D 197 Flers road.

Delville Wood was bounded on the southern edge by South Street, which was linked to Prince’s Street by Buchanan Street to the west, Campbell Street in the centre and King Street to the east, three parallel rides which faced north. Running east from Buchanan Street and parallel to Prince’s Street was Rotten Row. On the north side of Prince’s Street ran Strand, Regent Street and Bond Street, three rides to the northern fringe of the wood.

British plans of attack

General Sir Henry Rawlinson, commander of the Fourth Army ordered Congreve to use XIII Corps to capture Longueval, while the XV Corps (Lieutenant-General Horne) was to cover the left flank. Rawlinson wanted to advance across no man’s land at night for a dawn attack after a hurricane bombardment to gain surprise.

Haig opposed the plan because of doubts about inexperienced New Army divisions assembling on the battlefield at night but eventually deferred to Rawlinson and the corps commanders, after modifications to their plan.

An advance to Longueval could not begin until Trônes Wood was in British possession as it dominated the approach from the south. The capture of Longueval would then require the occupation of Delville Wood on the north-eastern edge of the town.

If Delville Wood was not captured German artillery observers could overlook the village and German infantry would have an ideal jumping-off point for attacks on Longueval.

A British advance would deepen the salient already formed to the north-east of Montauban but also assist British attacks to the south on Ginchy and Guillemont and on High Wood to the north-west.

The 9th (Scottish) Division was to attack Longueval and the 18th (Eastern) Division on the right was to occupy Trônes Wood. Furse, ordered that the Longueval attack be led by the 26th Brigade. The 8th (Service) Battalion, Black Watch and the 10th (Service) Battalion, Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders would lead, with the 9th (Service) Battalion, Seaforth Highlanders in support and the 5th (Service) Battalion, Queen’s Own Cameron Highlanders in reserve.

The 27th Brigade would follow on, to mop up any bypassed German troops and reinforce the leading battalions, once they had entered the village. When Longueval had been secured, the 27th Brigade was to pass through the 26th Brigade to take Delville Wood. The 1st South African Brigade was to be kept in reserve.

German defensive preparations

Despite considerable debate among German staff officers, Falkenhayn based defensive tactics in 1916 on unyielding defence and prompt counter-attacks, when ground had been lost.

On the Somme front Falkenhayn’s construction plan of January 1915 had been completed by early 1916. Barbed wire obstacles had been enlarged from one belt 5–10 yards (4.6–9.1 m) wide to two, 30 yards (27 m) wide and about 15 yards (14 m) apart. Double and triple thickness wire was used and laid 3–5 feet (0.91–1.52 m) high.

The front line had been increased from one line to three, 150–200 yards (140–180 m) apart, the first trench occupied by sentry groups, the second (Wohngraben) for the front-trench garrison and the third trench for local reserves.

The trenches were traversed and had sentry-posts in concrete recesses built into the parapet. Dugouts had been deepened from 6–9 feet (1.8–2.7 m) to 20–30 feet (6.1–9.1 m), 50 yards (46 m) apart and large enough for 25 men. An intermediate line of strongpoints (Stutzpunktlinie) about 1,000 yards (910 m) behind the front line was also built.

Communication trenches ran back to the reserve line, renamed the second line, which was as well-built and wired as the first line. The second line was beyond the range of Allied field artillery, to force an attacker to stop and move field artillery forward before assaulting the line.

The German front line lay along the old third position, which in this area ran from the southern edge of Bazentin le Grand to the south fringe of Longueval and then curved south-east past Waterlot Farm and Guillemont.

An Intermediate Line ran roughly parallel behind Delville Wood on a reverse slope, the wood being on a slight ridge which extended east from the village. Longueval had been fortified with trenches, tunnels, concrete bunkers and had two field guns.

The village was garrisoned by the divisions of IV Corps (General Sixt von Armin) and the 3rd Guard Division. The north and north-west was held by Thuringian Infantry Regiment 72 of the 8th Division. In and around Delville Wood, an area of about 0.5-square-mile (1.3 km2), which abutted the east side of Longueval and extended to within 0.5-mile (0.80 km) of Ginchy, were Infantry Regiment 26 of the 7th Division, Thuringian Infantry Regiment 153 and Infantry Regiment 107.

A British attack would have to advance uphill from Bernafay and Trônes woods, across terrain with a similar shape to a funnel, broad in the south and narrowing towards Longueval in the north.
Armin suspected that an attack would begin on 13th or 14th July.

Battle of Bazentin Ridge and Delville Wood order of battle
French Tenth and Sixth armies

The French Sixth Army was pushed back from Biaches south of the Somme by a German counter-attack on 14th July, which was retaken along with Bois Blaise and La Maisonette.

On 20th July, I Corps attacked at Barleux, where the 16th Division took the German front trench and was then stopped short of the second objective, by massed German machine-gun fire, before being counter-attacked and pushed back to the start line with 2,000 casualties.

Refusals of orders occurred in the 2nd Colonial Division, which led to two soldiers being court-martialled and shot.
Joffre ordered that the possibility of a rapid end to the war was to be played down. XXXV Corps had been moved from the north bank and reinforced by two divisions; the corps attacked to capture Soyécourt, Vermandovillers and high ground beyond, as a prelude to attacks by the Tenth Army from Chilly, north to the Sixth Army boundary.

XXXV Corps captured the north end of Soyécourt and Bois Étoile but then bogged down against flanking machine-gun fire and counter-attacks.

For the remainder of July and August, the German defence on the south bank contained the French advance. On the north side of the Somme, the Sixth Army advanced by methodical attacks against points of tactical value, to capture the German second position from Cléry to Maurepas.

VII Corps was brought in on the right of XX Corps, for the attack on the German second position, which was on the opposite side of a steep ravine, behind an intermediate line and strong points in the valley.

On 20th July, XX Corps attacked with the 47th and 153rd divisions; the 47th Division attack on the right was stopped by machine-gun fire in front of Monacu Farm, as the left flank advanced 800–1,200 metres (870–1,310 yd) and took Bois Sommet, Bois de l’Observatoire and the west end of Bois de la Pépinière. The 153rd Division captured its objectives, despite the British 35th Division being driven back from Maltz Horn Farm.

1st South African Brigade

14th–16th July

The divisions of XIII Corps and XV Corps attacked on 14th July, just before dawn at 3:25 a.m., on a 4-mile (6.4 km) front. The infantry moved forward over no man’s land to within 500 yards (460 m) of the German front line and attacked after a five-minute hurricane bombardment, which gained a measure of tactical surprise.

Penetrating the German second line by a sudden blow on a limited front was relatively easy but consolidating and extending the breach against alerted defenders was far more difficult. The attack on Longueval met with initial success, as the thin German outpost line was rapidly overwhelmed.
By mid-morning, the British troops had fought from house-to-house to the village square.

The effect of British artillery-fire diminished, as the north end of the village was out of view on a slight north-facing slope; German reinforcements reached the village and artillery and machine–gun fire from Delville Wood and Longueval, raked the 26th Brigade.

By the afternoon, the western and south western parts of the village had been occupied and the 27th Brigade, intended for the attack on Delville Wood had been used to reinforce the attack. At 1:00 p.m. Furse ordered the 1st South African Brigade to take over the attack on Delville Wood.

Three battalions of the 1st South African Brigade were to attack Delville Wood, while the 1st Battalion continued as a reinforcement of the 26th and 27th brigades in Longueval. The attack at 5:00 p.m. was postponed to 7:00 p.m. and then to 5:00 a.m.

on 15th July, due to the slow progress in Longueval. Brigadier-General Henry Lukin was ordered to take the wood at all costs and that his advance was to proceed, even if the 26th and 27th Brigades had not captured the north end of the village.

Lukin ordered an attack from the south-west corner of the wood on a battalion front, with the 2nd Battalion forward, the 3rd Battalion in support and the 4th Battalion in reserve. The three battalions moved forward from Montauban before first light, under command of Lieutenant–Colonel W. E. C. Tanner of the 2nd Battalion.

On the approach, Tanner received instructions to detach two companies to the 26th Brigade in Longueval and sent B and C companies of the 4th Battalion.

The 2nd Battalion reached a trench occupied by the 5th Camerons, which ran parallel to the wood and used this as a jumping-off line for the attack at 6:00 a.m.

The attack met little resistance and by 7:00 a.m. the South Africans had captured the wood south of Prince’s Street.
Tanner sent two companies to secure the northern perimeter of the wood. Later during the morning, the 3rd Battalion advanced towards the east and north-east of the wood and by 2:40 a.m. Tanner reported to Lukin that he had secured the wood except for a strong German position in the north-western corner adjoining Longueval.

The South African Brigade began to dig in around the fringe of the wood, in groups forming strong–points supported by machine–guns.

The brigade occupied a salient, in contact with the 26th Brigade only along the south-western edge of the wood adjoining Longueval.

The troops carried spades but digging through roots and remnants of tree trunks, made it impossible to dig proper trenches and only shallow shell scrapes could be prepared before German troops began to counter-attack the wood.

A battalion of the 24th Reserve Division counter-attacked from the south-east at 11:30 a.m., having been given five minutes’ notice but only managed to advance to within 80 yards (73 m) of the wood before being forced to dig in.

An attack by a second battalion from the Ginchy–Flers road was also repulsed, the battalions losing 528 men. In the early afternoon a battalion of the 8th Division attacked the north-eastern face of the wood and was also repulsed, after losing all its officers.

At 3:00 p.m. on 1th5 July Bavarian Reserve Infantry Regiment 6 of the 10th Bavarian Division attacked in force from the east but was partially driven back by rifle and machine-gun fire.

At 4:40 p.m. Tanner reported to Lukin that German forces were massing to the north of the wood and he called for reinforcements, as the South Africans had already lost a company from the 2nd (Natal and Free State) Battalion.

Tanner had received one company from the 4th (Scottish) Battalion from Longueval and Lukin sent a second company forward to reinforce the 3rd (Transvaal & Rhodesia) Battalion. Lukin sent messages urging Tanner and the battalion commanders to dig in regardless of fatigue, as heavy artillery fire was expected during the night or early the next morning.

As night fell German high explosive and gas shelling increased in intensity and a German counter-attack began at midnight with orders to recapture the wood at all costs.

The attack was made by three battalions from the 8th and 12th Reserve divisions and managed to reach within 50 yards (46 m), before being driven under cover by artillery and machine-gun fire. Later that night, fire into Delville Wood from four German Feldartillerie brigades reached a rate of 400 shells per minute.

On 14th–15th July the 18th Division had cleared Trônes Wood to the south and had established a line up to Maltz Horn Farm, adjacent to the French 153rd Division.

At 12:35 a.m. Lukin was ordered to capture the north-west part of Delville Wood at all costs and then to advance westwards to meet the 27th Brigade, as it attacked north and north–eastwards through Longueval.

The advance began on 16th July at 10:00 a.m. but the casualties of the South Africans had reduced the weight of the attack, which was repulsed by the German defenders.

The 27th Brigade advance were pinned down in the village by machine-gun fire from an orchard in the north end of Longueval. The survivors fell back to their trenches midway in the wood and were bombarded for the rest of the day.

The situation became desperate and was made worse by an attack by Thuringian Infantry Regiment 153.

17th–19th July

In the evening of 16th July, the South Africans withdrew south of Prince’s Street and east of Strand Street, for a bombardment on the north-west corner of the wood and the north end of Longueval. On 17th July, the 27th Brigade attacked northwards in Longueval and the 2nd South African Battalion plus two companies of the 1st Battalion, attacked westwards in the wood.

The South African attack was a costly failure and the survivors were driven back to their original positions, which came under increased German artillery-fire in the afternoon.

In the evening Tanner was wounded and replaced by Lieutenant-Colonel E. F. Thackeray, of the 3rd Battalion, as commander in Delville Wood. The 9th Division drew in its left flank and the 3rd Division (Major-General J. A. L. Haldane), was ordered to attack Longueval from the west during the night.

Huge numbers of shells were fired into the wood and Lukin ordered the men into the north-western sector, to support the attack on Longueval due at 3:45 a.m. During the night, the German 3rd Guards Division advanced behind a creeping barrage of 116 field guns and over 70 medium guns. The Germans reached Buchanan and Princes streets, driving the South Africans back from their forward trenches, with many casualties.

The Germans spotted the forming up of the troops in the wood and fired an unprecedented bombardment; every part of the area was searched and smothered by shells. During the barrage, German troops attacked and infiltrated the South African left flank, from the north-west corner of the wood.

By 2:00 p.m., the South African position had become desperate as German attacks were received from the north, north-west and east, after the failure of a second attempt to clear the north-western corner. At 6:15 p.m., news was received that the South Africans were to be relieved by the 26th Brigade.

The 3rd Division attack on Longueval had taken part of the north end of the village and Armin ordered an attack by the fresh 8th Division, against the Buchanan Street line from the south east, forcing Thackeray to cling to the south western corner of the wood for two days and nights, the last link to the remainder of the 9th Division.

On the morning of 18th July, the South Africans received support from the relatively fresh 76th Brigade of the 3rd Division, which attacked through Longueval into the south-western part of the wood, to join up with A Company of the 2nd South African Battalion, until the 76th Brigade was forced back by German artillery-fire. In the south, the South Africans recovered some ground because the Germans had made limited withdrawals ready for counter-attacks in other areas.

A German bombardment during the night became intense at sunrise and c. 400 shells per minute fell into Longueval and the wood, along with heavy rain, which filled shell-craters.

At 3:15 p.m., German infantry attacked Longueval and the wood from the east, north and north-east. Reserve Infantry Regiment 107 attacked westwards along the Ginchy–Longueval road, towards the 3rd South African Regiment, which was dug in along the eastern fringe of the wood, which commanded Ginchy.

The German infantry were cut down by small-arms fire as soon as they advanced and no more attempts were made to advance beyond the intermediate line.

The main German attack was made by the 8th Division and part of the 5th Division from the north and north-east.
Elements of nine battalions attacked with 6,000 men. Infantry Regiment 153 was to advance from south of Flers, to recapture Delville Wood and reach the second position along the southern edge of the wood, the leading battalion to occupy the original second line from the Longueval–Guillemont road to Waterlot Farm, the second battalion to dig in along the southern edge of the wood and the third battalion to occupy Prince’s Street along the centre of the wood.

At first the advance moved along the sunken Flers road, 150 yards (140 m) north of the wood, which was confronted by the 2nd South African Regiment along the north edge of the wood.

By afternoon, the north perimeter had been pushed further south by German attacks. Hand-to-hand fighting occurred all over the wood, as the South Africans could no longer hold a consolidated and continuous line, many of them being split into small groups without mutual support.

By the afternoon of 18th July, the fresh Branderberger Regiment had also engaged. A German officer wrote

… Delville Wood had disintegrated into a shattered wasteland of shattered trees, charred and burning stumps, craters thick with mud and blood, and corpses, corpses everywhere. In places they were piled four deep.

Worst of all was the lowing of the wounded. It sounded like a cattle ring at the spring fair….

and by 19 July, the South African survivors were shelled and sniped at from extremely close range.

In the early morning, Reserve Infantry Regiment 153 and two companies of Infantry Regiment 52, entered the wood from the north and wheeled to attack the 3rd South African Battalion from behind, capturing six officers and 185 men from the Transvaal Battalion; the rest were killed.

By mid morning, Black Watch, Seaforth and Cameron Highlanders in Longueval tried to charge into the wood but were repulsed by German small-arms fire from the north-west corner of the wood.

The brigade was short of water, without food and unable to evacuate wounded; many isolated groups surrendered, after they ran out of ammunition.

In the afternoon, the 53rd Brigade advanced from the base of the salient to reach Thackeray at the South African headquarters but were unable to reach the forward elements of the South African brigade. This situation prevailed through the night of 19th–20th July.

20th July

On 20th July, the 76th Brigade of the 3rd Division was again pushed forward to attempt to relieve the 1st South African Brigade. The Royal Welsh Fusiliers attacked towards the South Africans but by 1:00 p.m., Thackeray had informed Lukin that his men were exhausted, desperate for water and could not repel a further attack.

Troops of the Suffolk Regiment and the 6th Royal Berkshires broke through and joined with the last remaining South African troops, in the segment of the wood still under South African control. Thackeray marched out of the wood, leading two wounded officers and 140 other ranks, the last remnant of the South African Brigade.

Piper Sandy Grieve of the Black Watch, who had fought against the South African Boers as part of the Highland Brigade, in the Battle of Magersfontein in 1899 and been wounded through the cheeks, played the South Africans out. The survivors spent the night at Talus Boise and next day withdrew to Happy Valley south of Longueval.

21st July – 20th August

A British bombardment preparatory to the offensive planned for the night of 22nd/23rd July, began at 7:00 p.m. on 22nd July. The 3rd Division attacked Delville Wood and the north end of Longueval, from the west with the 9th Brigade from Pont Street, as the 95th Brigade of the 5th Division attacked German strong-points in the orchards to the north.

The two battalions of the 3rd Division had only recently arrived and had received their orders at the last minute.
The bombardment was considered poor but the attack began at 3:40 a.m. and the troops were quickly engaged by German machine-guns from the front and left flank. The advance covered a considerable distance but was forced back to Piccadilly and then Pont Street, where the survivors were bombarded by German artillery.

The two 95th Brigade battalions also had early success and threatened the German right flank. The Flers road was crossed and a strong point captured and consolidated but then a German counter-attack pushed both battalions back to Pont Street; a second attack was planned and then cancelled. Relief of the 3rd Division began on the night of 25th July by the 2nd Division, ready for another attack on most of Delville Wood, when the west end of Longueval and the rest of the wood were attacked by the 5th Division, in a larger operation by XIII Corps and XV Corps due on 27th July.

German artillery fired on the routes into Longueval and sent alarm signals aloft from the front line several times each day. On 27th July, every British gun in range, fired on the wood and village from 6:10 –7:10 a.m., as infantry patrols went forward through a German counter-bombardment, to study the effect of the British fire. The patrols found “a horrible scene of chaos and destruction”.

When the bombardment began, about sixty German soldiers surrendered to the 2nd Division and at zero hour, two battalions of the 99th Brigade advanced, with trench-mortar and machine-gun sections in support.

The infantry found a shambles of shell-craters, shattered trees and débris. After a ten-minute advance, the troops reached a trench along Prince’s Street, full of dead and wounded German infantry and took several prisoners.
The advance was continued when the barrage lifted by the supporting companies, which moved to the final objective about 50 yards (46 m) inside the northern fringe of the wood around 9:00 a.m.

A third battalion moved forward to mop up and guard the flanks but avoided the east end of the wood. As consolidation began, German artillery fired along Prince’s Street and caused far more casualties than those suffered during the attack.

On the left flank, the 15th Brigade of the 5th Division, attacked with one battalion forward and one in support.

German artillery-fire before zero hour was so extensive, that most of a company of the forward battalion was buried and the Stokes mortars knocked out. The support battalion was pushed forward and both advanced on time into the west end of the wood, where they linked with the 99th Brigade. The attack on Longueval was hampered by the German barrage to the south, which cut communications and by several machine-guns firing from the village.

An attempt by the Germans to reinforce the garrison from Flers failed, when British artillery-fire fell between the villages but the German infantry held out at the north end of Longueval. A British line was eventually established from the north-west of Delville Wood, south-west into the village, below the orchards at Duke Street and Piccadilly.

A German counter-attack began at 9:30 a.m., from the east end of Delville Wood against the 99th Brigade.

The German attack eventually penetrated behind Prince’s Street and pushed the British line back to face north-east.

Communications with the rear were cut several times and when the Brigade commander contradicted a rumour that the wood had been lost, the 2nd Division headquarters assumed that the wood was empty of Germans. Skirmishing continued and during the night, two battalions of the 6th Brigade took over from the 99th Brigade.

The 15th Brigade was relieved by the 95th Brigade that night and next morning Duke Street was occupied unopposed.

On 29th July, the XV Corps artillery fired a bombardment for thirty minutes and at 3:30 p.m., a battalion advanced on the left flank, to a line 500 yards (460 m) north of Duke Street; a battalion on the right managed a small advance.

On 30th July, subsidiary attacks were made at Delville Wood and Longueval, in support of a bigger attack to the south by XIII Corps and XX Corps. The 5th Division attacked with the 13th Brigade, to capture German strong-points north of the village and the south-eastern end of Wood Lane.

A preliminary bombardment began at 4:45 p.m. but failed to suppress the German artillery, which fired on the village and the wood. British communications were cut again, as two battalions advanced at 6:10 p.m.; the right-hand battalion was caught by German artillery-fire, at the north-west fringe of the wood but a company pushed on and dug in beyond.

The left-hand battalion crawled forward under the British barrage but as soon as it attacked, massed German small-arms fire forced the troops under cover in shell-holes. A battalion on the right with only 175 men was so badly shelled, that a battalion was sent forward and a reserve battalion of the 15th Brigade was also sent forward.

Attempts were made to reorganise the line in Longueval, where many units were mixed up; German artillery-fire was continuous and after dark the 15th Brigade took over. After representations by Major-General R. B. Stephens it was agreed that the 5th Division would be relieved during 1st August.

A lull occurred in early August, as the 17th Division took over from the 5th Division; the 52nd Brigade was ordered to attack Orchard Trench, which ran from Wood Lane to North Street and the Flers Road into Delville Wood.

A slow bombardment by heavy artillery and then a five-minute hurricane bombardment was followed by the attack at 12:40 a.m. on 4 August. Both battalions were stopped by German artillery and machine-gun fire; communications were cut and news of the costly failure was not reported until 4:35 a.m.

The 17th Division took over from the 2nd Division on the right and attacked again on 7th August, after a methodical bombardment, assisted by a special reconnaissance and photographic sortie by the RFC.

The 51st Brigade attacked at 4:30 p.m., to establish posts beyond the wood but the British were stopped by German artillery-fire while still inside.

After midnight, a fresh battalion managed to establish posts north of Longueval. German defensive positions in the area appeared much improved and the 17th Division was restricted to obtaining vantage points, before it was relieved by the 14th Division on 12 August.

XV Corps attacked again on 18th August; in Delville Wood, the 43rd Brigade of the 14th Division, attacked the north end of ZZ Trench, Beer Trench up to Ale Alley, Edge Trench and a sap along Prince’s Street, which had been found on reconnaissance photographs.

The right-hand battalion advanced close behind a creeping barrage at 2:45 p.m., reached the objective with few losses where the defenders surrendered. The south of Beer Trench was obliterated but the left-hand battalion was swept by artillery and machine-guns before the advance and reduced to remnants.

The battalion took Edge Trench and bombed along Prince’s Street, when German supports bombed down Edge Trench and retook it. In hand-to-hand fighting, the British held on to Hop Alley and blocked Beer Trench; two German attacks from Pint Trench were stopped by small-arms fire.

During the British attack, the German line from Prince’s Street to the Flers road, was bombarded by trench-mortars.

On the left, two battalions of the 41st Brigade attacked Orchard Trench and the south end of Wood Lane; keeping touch with an attack by the 33rd Division on High Wood.

The battalion on the right advanced close up to the creeping barrage, found Orchard Trench nearly empty and dug in beyond, with the right flank on the Flers road.

The left-hand battalion was enfiladed from the left flank, after the 98th Brigade of the 33rd Division was repulsed but took part of Wood Lane.

21st August – 3rd September

On 21st August, a battalion of the 41st Brigade attacked the German defences in the wood, obscured by smoke discharges on the flanks but the German defenders inflicted nearly 200 casualties by small-arms fire.

At midnight, an attack by the 100th Brigade of the 33rd Division, from the Flers road to Wood Lane began but the right-hand battalion was informed too late and the left-hand battalion attacked alone and was repulsed.

In a combined attack with the French from the Somme north to the XIV Corps and III Corps areas, XV Corps attacked to complete the capture of Delville Wood and consolidate from Beer Trench to Hop Alley and Wood Lane.

The 14th Division operation was conducted by a battalion of the 41st Brigade and three from the 42nd Brigade.

The right hand battalion was repulsed at Ale Alley but the other battalions, behind a creeping barrage moving in lifts of only 25 yards (23 m), advanced through the wood until their right flank was exposed, which prevented most of Beer Trench from being occupied. On the left flank, the westernmost battalion dug in on the final objective and gained touch with the 33rd Division on the Flers road.

The new line ran south, from the right of the battalion near the Flers road, into the wood and then south-east along the edge to Prince’s Street. Flares were lit for contact-aeroplanes, which were able to report the new line promptly. Over 200 prisoners and more than twelve machine-guns were captured.

Early next day, a battalion of the 42nd Brigade captured Edge Trench, to a point close to the junction with Ale Alley. Amidst rain delays, the 7th Division relieved the right-hand brigade of the 14th Division on the night of 26th and 27th August and later a battalion of the 43rd Brigade made a surprise attack, took the rest of Edge Trench and barricaded Ale Alley, taking about 60 prisoners from Infantry Regiment 118 of the 56th Division, which eliminated the last German foothold in Delville Wood.

An attack on the evening of 28 August, by a battalion on the right flank and a battalion of the 7th Division to the right, from the east end of the wood, against Ale Alley to the junction with Beer Trench failed.

The 14th and 33rd divisions were relieved by the 24th Division by the morning of 31 August, after the 42nd Brigade had built posts along the wreckage of Beer Trench as far as the south-east of Cocoa Lane and dug a sap from the end of Prince’s Street.

The last week of August had been very wet, which made patrolling even more difficult but XV Corps detected the arrival of German reinforcements.

The activity of the German artillery around Delville Wood suggested another counter-attack was imminent, as the 24th Division took over the defence of the wood and Longueval. German aircraft flew low over the British front positions and then a much more intense bombardment began.

The German attack began at 1:00 p.m. and the 7th Division on the right of the corps, was attacked along Ale Alley and Hop Alley and replied with rapid fire. The German infantry were repulsed but a second attack at 2:00 p.m. was only held after hand-to-hand fighting just east of the wood.

More German aircraft reconnoitred the area and German artillery-fire greatly increased around 4:30 p.m., followed by a third attack at 7:00 p.m., which pushed the British back into the wood, except on the left at Edge Trench. On the right flank, the Ginchy–Longueval road was held against the German attacks and some reinforcements arrived after dark, at the east end of the wood.

At the north-east side, the right-hand battalion of the 72nd Brigade had moved forward, to dig in beyond the German bombardment and was not attacked; the left-hand battalion withdrew its right flank to Inner Trench to evade the bombardment and a strong point on Cocoa Lane was captured.

The left flank of the battalion and the neighbouring right-hand battalion of the 73rd Brigade, were attacked at 1:00 p.m. and repulsed the German infantry and Stoßtruppen with small-arms and artillery-fire.

To the west, the left-hand battalion was caught in the German bombardment and lost nearly 400 men. German infantry advanced from Wood Lane and bombed along Tea Trench almost as far as North Street.

Other German troops attacked south-east into Orchard Trench, before British reinforcements arrived and contained the German advance, with the help of flanking fire from the 1st Division beyond the III Corps boundary. It was not until long after dark, that the extent of the German success was communicated to the XV Corps headquarters, where plans were made to recapture the ground next day.

A battalion from the 73rd Brigade of the 24th Division counter-attacked at dawn by bombing along Orchard Trench but was repulsed by the German defenders.

More bombers attacked around Pear Street at 9:50 a.m. but were also repulsed. A costly frontal attack by a battalion of the 17th Brigade at 6:30 p.m., overran Orchard Trench and Wood Lane up to Tea Trench.

On the east side of the wood, two platoons from the 91st Brigade attacked at 5:00 a.m. but were forced back by small arms fire and at 3:00 p.m. a battalion of the 24th Division managed to bomb a short way down Edge Trench, which was almost invisible after the recent bombardments.

On 1st September, the battalion attacked again but made little progress against German bombers and snipers.

The 7th Division was due to attack Ginchy on 3rd September but the Germans in Ale Alley, Hop Alley and the east end of Delville Wood commanded the ground over which the attack was to cross.

A preliminary attack was arranged with the 24th Division, to begin five minutes before the main attack to recapture the ground.

The 7th Division bombers used “fumite” grenades but these were too easy to see and alerted the German defenders and the 24th Division battalion received such contradictory orders that its attack north of Ale Alley failed.

Attacks on 4 September by two companies at the east end of the wood also failed and next day two companies managed to reach the edge of the wood close to Hop Alley and dig in.

On the night of 5th September, the 24th Division was relieved by the 55th Division and the 166th Brigade dug in beyond the north-east fringe of the wood unopposed.

Air operations
The first attack on Longueval and Delville Wood from 14th and 15th July, was conducted under the observation of 9 Squadron, which directed counter-battery artillery-fire, photographed the area and flew contact-patrols to report the positions of infantry.

During the morning a patrol of F.E. 2bs from 22 Squadron escorted the corps aircraft but no German aeroplanes were seen.[e] The British aircraft carried new “Buckingham” tracer ammunition, which made aiming easier and began to attack German targets on the ground.

The crews machine-gunned German infantry near Flers, cavalry sheltering under trees and other parties of German troops to the south-west.

During the XV Corps attacks on 24th August, 3 Squadron aircraft brought back detailed information about the progress of the infantry, who had lit many red flares when called on by contact-aircraft. Fourteen flares were seen by an observer at 6:40 p.m. to the north of the wood, which showed that the troops had overrun their objective and were under shrapnel fire from British artillery.

The information was taken back and dropped by message-bag, which got the barrage lifted by 100 yards (91 m).

The crew returned to the wood, completed the contact-patrol and reported to the XV Corps headquarters by 8:00 p.m., showing that the 14th Division was held up on the east side of the wood.

A further attack the following morning captured the area, which was closely observed by British aircraft.

German 2nd Army

14th –19th July

In the German Official History (Der Weltkrieg) and regimental accounts, some units were not surprised. The British attack succeeded at a few points, from which the troops worked sideways to roll up the German defenders, a tactical manoeuvre not used on 1st July.

Bavarian Infantry Regiment 16 lost c. 2,300 men and the headquarters of Infantry Regiment Lehr, Bavarian Infantry Regiment 16, I Battalion, Reserve Infantry Regiment 91 and II Battalion, Bavarian Infantry Regiment 16 were captured. General Armin, the IV Corps commander, who had taken over from Longueval to the Ancre that morning, ordered troops to hold their positions.

The 7th Division had been relieving the 183rd Division and part was sent to Longueval and the second line further back, along with resting units from the 185th, 17th Reserve, 26th Reserve and 3rd Guard divisions and troops of the 55th Landwehr Regiment (7th Landwehr Division), equivalent to fourteen battalions.

After alarmist reports of British cavalry in High Wood and that Flers and Martinpuich had fallen, the 5th, 8th, 8th Bavarian Reserve and 24th Reserve divisions were ordered by Below to counter-attack to stop the British advance. When the true situation was discovered, the counter-stroke was cancelled and the 5th and 8th divisions returned to reserve.

On 15th July, II Battalion, Reserve Infantry Regiment 107 of the 24th Reserve Division attacked from the south-east of Delville Wood at about 11:30 a.m. but was stopped by small-arms and artillery-fire 80 yards (73 m) short of the wood and driven under cover.

An attack by the III Battalion from the Flers–Ginchy road soon after, was also stopped short and the battalions lost 528 men. I Battalion, Infantry Regiment 72 from the 8th Division attacked the north-eastern face of the wood and was also repulsed. Armin ordered another attack after dark by the 8th Division and 12th Reserve Division, to take back the wood at all costs.

The preparations were rushed and no postponement was allowed; a bombardment began at 9:00 p.m., before the advance began around midnight by I and II battalions of Infantry Regiment 153 from the 8th Division and II Battalion, Reserve Infantry Regiment 107 of the 12th Reserve Division, on the east, north-east and northern faces of the wood, which also failed against artillery and machine-gun fire, 50 yards (46 m) short of the wood, after which German artillery bombarded the wood all night.

Further attempts to regain the wood on 16th July were also costly failures.
The 8th Division planned to recapture Delville Wood on 18th July and the most advanced troops were withdrawn late on 17th July, for a bombardment which began at 11:45 p.m., using the heavy guns of groups Von Gossler and Von Armin, the field artillery of the 8th Division and three batteries of the 12th Reserve Division, about 116 field guns and 70 medium guns, heavy guns and howitzers.

The German bombardment turned Delville Wood into an “inferno”, before slackening at around 3:45 a.m. during a British attack. After 3:30 p.m., German troops from I Battalion, Reserve Infantry Regiment 104 and II and III battalions, Reserve Infantry Regiment 107, attacked the wood in several waves from the north-east, as eight companies of Infantry Regiment 153 of the 8th Division attacked from the north, to reach a line from Longueval to Waterlot Farm road. Another attack from the north and north-west by five companies of Infantry Regiment 26 of the 7th Division, reached the southern edge of the village.
The attacks were not co-ordinated but were led by companies of Stormtroops and flammenwefer (Flamethrower) detachments, which fell into confusion in the wood; after dark parts of II Battalion, Infantry Regiment 52 of the 5th Division reinforced the troops in the wood and the village.

On 19th July, the Germans in the wood endured massed British artillery-fire and Infantry Regiment 52 and part of Grenadier Regiment 12 were sent into the wood and the village, where Infantry Regiment 26 had appealed for relief before it collapsed. A British attack early on 20th July reached the village, where two companies were overwhelmed and 82 prisoners taken.

By 20th July, Infantry Regiment 26, which had been at full strength on 13th July, was reduced to 360 men and with Infantry Regiment 153, was relieved by Grenadier Regiment 12, which held Delville Wood and Longueval with Infantry Regiment 52, under the command of the 5th Division.

German 1st Army

20th July – 3rd September

The German defence of the Somme was reorganised in July and the troops of the Second Army north of the Somme were transferred to the command of a re-established 1st Army under the command of Below, overseen by General von Gallwitz the new commander of the 2nd Army and armeegruppe Gallwitz-Somme.

During a British attack on 23rd July the 5th Division had to engage nearly all of its troops to resist the attack, which threw the defence into confusion. In anticipation of more British attacks a box-barrage was fired around the village and wood.

163 prisoners of Grenadier Regiment 8 were taken in a British attack on 27th July, one prisoner calling it the worst shelling he had endured.
At 9:30 a.m., German troops were seen massing for a counter-attack and managed to advance through a British protective artillery barrage, to engage the British infantry in a bombing fight.

The German attack took part of the east end of the wood but the exhaustion of the 5th Division, which had been reduced to a “pitiable state”, required reinforcement by three battalions, mainly from the 12th Division, from 27th–29th July.

On 30th July, British artillery-fire caused many casualties and the right flank of the 5th Division was hurriedly reinforced by I Battalion, Reserve Infantry Regiment 163 of the 17th Reserve Division, sent from Ytres, which was spotted by British aircrews at Beaulencourt and shelled. During the night II Battalion, Infantry Regiment 23 of the 12th Division was relieved by the I Battalion.

On 4th August, a British attack began as the Fusilier Battalion of Grenadier Regiment 12 was being relieved by I Battalion, Infantry Regiment 121 of the 26th Division, which was taking over from the 5th Division, Grenadier Regiment 119 coming into line to the east.

A general relief of the German troops on the Somme front was conducted, as the British artillery kept up a steady bombardment of Delville Wood and German observation balloons began to operate between Ginchy and the wood.

On 18th August, Infantry Regiment 125 of the 27th Division was surprised by an attack from the east end of Delville Wood, after its trenches were almost obliterated by British artillery.

The British infantry arrived as soon as the barrage lifted and Grenadier Regiment 119 to the north, was almost rolled up from its left flank but two companies of III Battalion counter-attacked through I Battalion, which had lost too many men to participate.

At the north-west side of the wood, Infantry Regiment 121 of the 26th Division found that the British artillery had made Orchard Trench almost untenable. II Battalion had to advance through the shell-fire and dig a new line behind Orchard Trench, to maintain touch with the flanks, before being relieved by I Battalion overnight.

The trench was occupied by Infantry Regiment 104 of the 40th Division, from North Street to the west and by Infantry Regiment 121 north of Longueval, which repulsed an attack on 21st August.

Another British attack came on 24th August, as Infantry Regiment 88 from the 56th Division began to relieve Infantry Regiment 121 and Grenadier Regiment 119.

Every man left in the regiment was needed to withstand the attack, which caused the loss of more than 200 prisoners and twelve machine-guns.

After the attack, Fusilier Regiment 35 of the 56th Division relieved Infantry Regiment 125, which called the days on the Somme “the worst in the war”. II Battalion, Infantry Regiment 181 was sent as a reinforcement and one of its companies was annihilated.

An attempted counter-attack by the battalion and part of Infantry Regiment 104, was smashed by British artillery-fire and a German counter-bombardment hampered British consolidation.

On 27th August, the German garrison in Edge Trench, the last foothold in Delville Wood, was driven out and Infantry Regiment 118 lost 60 prisoners.
A counter-attack to recover the wood was made possible by the arrival of a wave of fresh German divisions on the Somme and in late August, German artillery preparation began for an attack on 31st August.

The 4th Bavarian and 56th divisions were to make a pincer attack at 2:15 p.m. on the east and north sides of the wood, with I Battalion, Bavarian Infantry Regiment 5, III Battalion, Fusilier Regiment 35 and II Battalion, Infantry Regiment 88. Each battalion attacked with two companies forward and two in support.

Jäger Battalion 3, was one of the first to be trained and equipped as a specialist assault unit; training had begun in mid-June, after large numbers of unfit men had been transferred to other units. Fitness training and familiarisation with light mortars and flame-throwers had been provided and the unit arrived on the Somme on 20th August.

Parts of the unit began demonstrations and training courses in the new tactics and the 1st and 2nd companies were attached to the Bavarian and Fusilier battalions, which were to retake Delville Wood.

The attack began after a bombardment from 10:00 a.m., which had little effect on the British defences.

At the east end of the wood, Fusilier Regiment 35 attacked with the support of flame-thrower detachments but the mud was so bad that six became unusable, the artillery preparation was inadequate and the first two attacks failed. The third attempt, after a more extensive bombardment, was called “a wonderful victory”.

The attack from the north came from three companies of Infantry Regiment 88 and Stormtroops either side of Tea Lane. British return fire caused many casualties and forced the attackers to move from shell-hole to shell-hole, eventually being pinned down in no man’s land.

The survivors withdrew after dark, rallying at Flers. I Battalion, Bavarian Infantry Regiment 5, with a company of Jäger Battalion 3, attached flame-thrower and bombing detachments, attacked eastwards towards the 56th Division, along Tea and Orchard trenches, where a bomber killed a British machine-gun crew, by throwing a grenade 60 metres (66 yd).

A second artillery bombardment was fired at 5:00 p.m., and the Jäger managed to take 300 prisoners and gain a foothold. The position in the wood was abandoned by the Jäger, because the repulse of the 56th Division units, left them isolated and under increasing artillery-fire

Aftermath
Analysis

Lukin had wanted to defend Delville Wood with machine-guns and small detachments of infantry but prompt German counter-attacks prevented this and Tanner had needed every man for the defence.

The British had eventually secured Longueval and Delville Wood in time for the formations to their north to advance and capture High Wood ready for the Flers–Courcelette and the later Somme battles. Over the southern part of the British front, there had been c. 23,000 casualties for a small “tongue” of ground a few miles deep.

The Allies and Germans had suffered many casualties in continuous piecemeal attacks and counter-attacks. Gallwitz recorded that from 26th June to 28th August, 1,068 field guns from 1,208 on the Somme had been destroyed, captured or made unserviceable, along with 371 of the 820 heavy guns.

In 2005, Prior and Wilson wrote that an obvious British remedy to the salient at Delville Wood, was to move the right flank forward, yet only twenty attacks were made in this area, against 21 at the wood and 29 further to the left.

The writers held that British commanders had failed to command and had neglected the troops, who were frittered away, such that the attrition of British forces was worse than the effect on the Germans It was speculated that this was perhaps a consequence of the inexperience of Haig and Rawlinson, in handling forces vastly larger than the British peacetime army.

Prior and Wilson also wrote that 32 British divisions engaged 28 German divisions, most of which suffered casualties greater than 50 percent, due to the 7,800,000 shells fired by the British from 15th July to 12th September, despite shell-shortages and problems in transporting ammunition, when rain had soaked the ground. German failings were also evident, particularly in counter-attacking to regain all lost ground, even when of little tactical value, which demonstrated that commanders on both sides had failed to control the battle.

In 2009, Harris wrote that during the seven weeks’ battle for control of Delville Wood, the infantry on both sides endured what appeared to be a bloody and frustrating stalemate, which was even worse for the Germans.

The greater amount of British artillery and ammunition was directed by RFC artillery-observers in aircraft and balloons, which increased the accuracy of fire, despite the frequent rainy and misty weather.

German counter-attacks were tactically unwise and exposed German infantry to British fire power regardless of the value of the ground being attacked. In the Fourth Army sector, the Germans counter-attacked seventy times from 15th July to 14th September against ninety British attacks, many in the vicinity of Delville Wood. The British superiority in artillery was often enough to make costly failures of the German efforts and since German troops were relieved less frequently, the constant British bombardments and loss of initiative reduced German morale.

By the end of July, the German defence north of the Somme had reached a point of almost permanent collapse; on 23rd July, the defence of Guillemont, Delville Wood and Longueval almost failed and from 27th to 28th July, contact with the defenders of the wood was lost;

On 30th July another crisis occurred between Guillemont and Longueval. Inside the flanks of the German first position, troops occupied shell-holes to evade bombardment by the British artillery, which vastly increased the strain on the health and morale of the troops, isolated them from command, made it difficult to provide supplies and to remove wounded.

Corpses strewed the landscape, fouled the air and reduced men’s appetites even when cooked food could be brought from the rear, troops in the most advanced positions lived on tinned food and went thirsty. From 15th to 27th July, the 7th and 8th divisions of IV Corps, from Delville Wood to Bazentin le Petit had 9,494 casualties.

The Battle for Longueval and Delville Wood, had started with a charge by the 2nd Indian Cavalry Division between Longueval and High Wood and two weeks after the wood was cleared, tanks went into action for the first time.

A number of important tactical lessons were learned from the battle for the village and wood. Night assembly and advances, dawn attacks after short, concentrated artillery barrages for tactical surprise, defensive lines built on the fringes wooded areas, because tree roots in woods prevented digging and to avoid shells which detonated in branches, showering troops with wood splinters. Troops were relieved after two days, as longer periods exhausted them and consumed their ammunition, bombs and rations.

The persistence of the British attacks during July and August, helped to preserve Franco-British relations, although Joffre criticised the large number of small attacks on 1th1 August and tried to cajole Haig into agreeing to a big combined attack. A bigger attack British by three corps on 18th August, was spoilt by several days of heavy rain, which reduced artillery observation and gained no ground at Delville Wood.

Casualties

Forty-two more German divisions fought on the Somme front in July; by the end of the month German losses had increased to c. 160,000 and Anglo-French casualties were more than 200,000 men.
The battle for Delville Wood was costly for both sides and the 9th Division had 7,517 casualties from 1st to 20th July, of which the 1st (South African) Infantry Brigade lost 2,536 men.
From 11th to 27th July the 3rd Division had 6,102 casualties.
The 5th Division lost c. 5,620 casualties from 19th July to 2nd August.
The 17th Division had 1,573 casualties from 1st to 13th August.
The 8th Division lost 2,726 casualties from 14th 21st July.
The 14th Division lost 3,615 casualties and the 33rd Division lost 3,846 men in August.

From the end of August to 5th September the 24th Division had , 2,000 casualties.

Details of German losses are incomplete, particularly for Prussian divisions, due to the loss of records to Allied bombing in World War II.

From 15th to 27thJuly the 7th and 8th divisions of IV Corps held the line from Delville Wood to Bazentin le Petit and lost 9,494 casualties.

The 5th Division was not relieved from Delville Wood until 3rd August and lost. 5,000 casualties, a greater loss than at Verdun in May.

Infantry Regiment 26, which had been at full strength on 13th July was reduced 260 men on 20th July.

Miles wrote that many German divisions returned from a period on the Somme with losses greater than. 4,500 men.
Bavarian Infantry Regiment 5 of the 4th Bavarian Division recorded “the loss of many good, irreplaceable men”.

to continue ….

Victoria Crosses
Private William Frederick Faulds on 18th July: 1st Battalion, 1st South African Brigade, 9th Scottish Division.
Corporal Joseph John Davies on 20th July: 10th Battalion Royal Welsh Fusiliers, 76th Brigade, 3rd Division
Private Albert Hill on 20th July: 10th Battalion Royal Welsh Fusiliers, 76th Brigade, 3rd Division.
Major W. la Touche Congreve 20th July, Brigade Major 76th Brigade, 3rd Division.
Sergeant Albert Gill on 27th July: 1st Battalion King’s Royal Rifle Corps, 99th Brigade, 2nd Division.

Subsequent operations
Battle of Flers–Courcelette, Operation Michael, and Second Battle of the Somme (1918)
The Battle of Flers–Courcelette (15th to 22nd September) the third British general offensive during the Battle of the Somme continued the advance from Delville Wood and Longueval. The battle was notable for the first use of tanks and the capture of the villages of Courcelette, Martinpuich and Flers.

In the XV Corps area, the 14th Division on the right advanced to the area of Bull’s Road between Flers and Lesboeufs, in the centre the 41st Division, the newest division in the BEF, captured Flers with the help of tank D-17 and the New Zealand Division on the left, between Delville and High woods took the Switch Line, linking with the 41st Division in Flers, after two tanks arrived and the German defenders were overrun. The Fourth Army made a substantial advance of 2,500–3,500 yards (2,300–3,200 m) but failed to reach the final objectives.

The Allies held the Wood until 24th March 1918 when the 47th Division received orders to retire with the rest of V Corps after German troops broke through the junction of V Corps and VII Corps. British and German soldiers sometimes found themselves marching parallel as the British troops formed a new line facing south between Hight Wood and Bazentin le Grand.

On 29th August 1918 the 38th Division attacked at 5:30 a.m., to take the high ground east of Ginchy and then capture Delville Wood and Longueval from the south. The 113th Brigade was virtually unopposed and reached the objective by 9:00 a.m. and the 115th Brigade advanced north of the wood, which was mopped up by the 114th Brigade.

Later in the day the advance reached the vicinity of Morval.

The Armistice ended hostilities three months later.

Sourced from

An article by Neil Sears for The Daily Mail

Wikipedia

95th Rifles: A March Through Time: 1800 to 1804

 Articles  Comments Off on 95th Rifles: A March Through Time: 1800 to 1804
Jan 262017
 

95th Rifles A March Through Time: 1800 to 1804©

Memorial at Peninsula are pleased to introduce Phillip Eyden who has complied this latest article for our website. Phillip is an Author, Archaeologist and a Historian. He has researched Military history and ancestry, Phillip was awarded a people’s award in 2016 from his local community, he is also a Volunteer trustee of the Drop Redoubt Fort in the Western Heights Dover Kent, which is managed by Western Heights Preservation Society. The Drop Redoubt Fort is  an English Heritage property. Phillip also helps promote the Grand Shaft Staircase. He has also compiled some interesting articles of research which evidence that the 95th Rifles were at the Western Heights, thus keeping the presence of our illustrious history alive using unseen newspaper articles of military history and ancestry. The Drop Redoubt Fort is an English Heritage site. These recently researched historical facts, give evidence that the 95th Rifles were at the Western Heights before going to the Battle field during the Peninsula campaign one such battlefield was Waterloo. These findings give more credence to the illustrious Regiments of a bygone era, thus keeping reality whilst weaving a fine tapestry of our Military history. A Sharpe insight to our illustrious Historical Regiments’ finest, these articles are quite unique.

Phillip Eyden

Author Name Phil Eyden

Archaeologist, Military Historian and Author 

The British Libraries Local Newspaper Archive has opened up a fascinating world to local historians. Local newspapers can be accessed from the living room, something that was unthinkable a few years ago. This has proven a treasure trove of information for researchers and genealogists. Here is a compilation of extracts that shed a little light on the earliest days of the 95th Rifles.

4th January 1800 – London Gazette

“Three regiments of Riflemen are immediately to be formed out of our army. Colonel Macdonald of the 55th is to have one of them, and Lord Craven another.”

This was reported in half a dozen local papers, the Sussex Advertiser being the first on the 6th January. This is the earliest reference to the 95th Rifles.

14th January 1800 – Chester Courant

Clearly the decision to raise the regiments met approval with the editors. They added:

“We are glad to hear that three regiments of riflemen are to be raised. The want of a sufficient quantity of ‘sharp shooters’ was sensibly felt during the late expedition to Holland. The Hessian troops have hitherto been considered as exceeding all others in this species of service.”

14th January 1800 – Kentish Weekly Post

The same day the Kentish Weekly Post added:

“The Corps of riflemen which are about to be formed, are to be selected from the flank companies of the different regiments of the line.”

10th March 1800 – Hampshire Telegraph

There are no references to the Rifles during February but by March it appears that the units were beginning to form. The paper reported:

“Detachments have been sent from different regiments to Horsham, in Sussex, in order to be trained as Riflemen”.

28th March 1800 – Kentish Gazette

Training was clearly underway by late March.

“Two battalions of riflemen, selected from different corps of infantry, are at present stationed at Horsham. They are under arms six hours every day, practicing their manoeuvers and firing at targets.”

21st April 1800 – Sussex Advertiser

A disturbance broke out at Horsham on 20th April:

“…a dispute arose in Horsham barracks between some soldiers of the 13th regiment of foot, and an equal number of the rifle corps, which produced a rencontre with bayonets, that threatened serious consequences; but it happily terminated without the loss of lives, though several were wounded, and two so desperately, that they laid for some time apparently dead. Such as were most materially hurt, were taken to Hospital, where they now remain under the care of the Surgeon. Tranquillity was more effectively restored by the march of the former regiment (which is in the most part Irish) the next morning for Silver Hill.”

5th May 1800 – Sussex Advertiser

A report from Lewes referring to the 28th and 29th April records:

“…the Rifle Corps, under the command of Colonel Manningham, arrived here from the barracks at Horsham”

1st May 1800 – Bath Chronicle

The Bath Chronicle of 1st May added that the regiment at Horsham comprised of 800 men and was under the command of the Hon. Col. Stewart.

12th May 1800 – The Sussex Advertiser

A report from Horsham of an early move of the new Rifles on the 12th and 13th:

“This morning the First division of the Rifle Corps stationed in our town and barracks, and under marching orders for Bagshot, proceeded on their march by the following route, viz. Today Horsham, Tuesday Guildford, Stoke, Stratford, and St. Catherine’s Mill. Wednesday, Bagshot to pitch their camp in the high ground allotted to them. The Second Division will follow by the same route tomorrow morning.”

A week later the paper added:

“On Tuesday and Wednesday last the Corps of Riflemen stationed here, marched in two divisions, for Bagshot, there to be encamped”. 

12th June 1800 – Caledonian Mercury

On the 28th May, in reference to a review of the Colonel Scott’s Dumbartonshire Militia by General Champagny at Antrim, the new Rifles received a batch of new recruits:

“A considerable number of fine fellows were selected by him for the corps of riflemen, about to be embodied for general service.” 

14th July 1800  – Reading Mercury.

A small number of Riflemen were reported to have assisted in defusing an unpleasant incident at Brimscombe, near Stroud in Gloucestershire at the hub of the Thames and Severn Canal on the 7th July. A barge carrying wheat down the canal to Brimscombe was halted by a group of people who had planned to steal the cargo. As the wheat was being offloaded onto a waggon the local magistrate J. Hollings and the Stroud Volunteer Infantry arrived, read the Riot Act and arrested the ringleaders. The thieves abandoned the attack, the barge was then reloaded and its trip resumed. Early in the evening the rioters reassembled, threw stones at the infantry and fired pistols at them, to which the infantry replied with a musket volley. In the exchange three persons were wounded. Again the rioters retreated and the infantry continued to escort the barge. A detachment of Yeomanry scouted ahead, checking bridges and roads ahead. At Brimscombe Captain Wathen attended with a party of Riflemen to escort the barge on the last part of its journey. A large group of people gathered at the port in the morning to protest, at the head of which was a woman who swore at Hollings. He had her committed to prison. Peace was restored shortly after.

9th August 1800 – Oxford Journal

A number of Riflemen were sent abroad for the first time on the 4th and 5th August, although the details were kept from the papers.

“On Monday and Tuesday 3000 men embarked on Southsea Beach, Portsmouth, with a number of Riflemen; these with the troops from Netley, make about 12,000 including the Horse Artillery, which embarked on Tuesday last. The expedition was expected to fall immediately under convoy of the Eurydice and Termagant frigates.”

The departure was for a landing at Ferol in Spain where three companies under the command of Lt. Col. William Stewart landed to dislodge Spanish defenders on the 25th. The expedition was a failure and Stewart was wounded.

5th September 1800 – Kentish Weekly Post

A report from Canterbury records the allocations of winter stations for many regiments:

“The Rifle Corps to march from Swinley Camp to Blatchington, where they will arrive on Wednesday 3rd September.” 

15th September 1800 – Hampshire Telegraph.

Further recruits arrived at Portsmouth.

“On Tuesday about 300 Riflemen, commanded by Major Callander of the 62nd Regiment, disembarked here from the Modeste, Captain Hinton, from Cork. They were all selected from the Highland Fencible Regiments in Ireland, and are the finest body of young men we have seen this War.“ 

6th October 1800 – Sussex Advertiser

The Fencibles only lasted a fortnight in service with the Rifles:

“The Rifle Corps at Bletchington, having lately received a very considerable augmentation from the Scottish Fencibles, many of the men having been detached from different regiments to be instructed in the rifle exercise, have, by choice (though a bounty would have been the reward of their continuance) been dismissed from service, to return to their respective corps. A division of eighty on Friday passed through this town on their route to Ireland.” 

7th October 1800 – London Gazette

Officer appointments were announced to the new Corps.

Colonel Coote Manningham from the 41st Foot to be colonel.

Lieutenant-Colonel the Honourable William Stewart, from the 67th Foot, to be lieutenant-colonel.

Major George Callander, from the 62nd Foot, to be major.

Captain Hamlet Wade, from the 25th Foot, to be major.

21st October 1800 – London Gazette

More officers:

Lieut. Alexander D. Cameron, from the 21st Foot, to be captain-lieutenant.

To be lieutenants – Lieuts Blois Lynch, from the 29th, J.A. Grant from the 25th, John Stuart from the 79th, Peter O’Hare from the 69th, T. Stirling Edmonston, from the 2nd Bat. Royals, Alex. Clarke, from the 92nd, Neil Campbell from the 57th, John Ross from the 72nd, Second Lieutenant Edw. Bedwell Law, from the 21st. Ensign H. Powell from the 2nd Bat. Royals, W. Cotter, from the 79th, John Cameron from the 92nd, Douglas from the 29th, L.H. Bennet from the 68th, To be adjutant, Lieut J.A. Grant. To be quarter-master, serjeant-major Donald Mackay.

4th November 1800 – London Gazette

James Innes to be pay-master.

2nd December 1800 – London Gazette.

To be Second Lieutenants: Lieutenant Henry Goode from the 62nd foot. Second Lieutenant James Macdonald from the 21st Foot. Ensign Thomas Brereton from the 46th Foot, Loftus Gray from ditto, John Jenkins from ditto, Patrick Turner from the 62nd Foot, Samuel Mitchel from the 71st Foot; George Elender from the 46th Foot; James Prendergast from the 56th Foot, John Burton from ditto.

20th December 1800 – London Gazette

To be 1st Lieutenant – Lieut. C. Napier. 

 

6th January 1801 – London Gazette

Colonel Manningham, late Aide-de-Camp to the King, is to have command of the Rifle Corps.

To be surgeon – John Robb

To be assistant surgeons – G. Rowe, Henry Messiter. 

28th February 1801 – Various

Multiple papers then record Col. Stewart’s Corps of Riflemen along with the 49th Regiment embarking on a fleet of ships at Portsmouth onto ships of the North Sea Fleet. They were bound for Denmark.

5th March 1801 – London Courier and Evening Gazette

Lewes on March 2nd:

“Last Tuesday one hundred of the Rifle Regiment, commanded by Col. Manningham, marched from Bletchington Barracks, on their rout to Portsmouth, to embark for service in Egypt.” 

11th March 1801 – Courier

In reference to the North Sea Fleet:

“The rifle troops, commanded by Colonel Manningham, are on board Lord Nelson’s ship The George.” 

25th March 1801 –London Courier and Evening Gazette

A case of forgery…

“Corporal Gordon, of the rifle regiment, commanded by Colonel Manningham, now stationed at Blatchington Barracks, at Seaford, Sussex, charged with forgery. On his examination it appeared, on the information of George Stone, apprentice to Mr. J Brooker, at Seaford, that soon after noon on the above day, the prisoner came to his master’s shop, with an order for stationary, purporting to be the handwriting of Lieut. P. O’Hare, acting Adjutant of the said regiment; which order he said he received from the prisoner, and in consequence delivered to him goods to the amount of £1 1s 8d and in cash £1 1s 7d, making altogether £2 3s 3d including 2 quire of paper had by the orderly man; after which he put the order on the file, and proved it to be the same as then produced. The prisoner said nothing in his defence, but begged for mercy; upon which T. Harben, Esq. one of the Magistrates, addressed him in a pathetic strain, and told him, from the nature of the offence, he feared he could have no reasonable hope for mercy from any earthly tribunal, and therefore advised him to prepare for the worst. He was committed to the gaol at Seaford, where, from its peculiar jurisdiction, he will in all probability take his trial. Gordon, it is said, is from a very respectable and opulent family.”

The Hampshire Chronicle of the 11th May records that Gordon was tried at the sessions at Seaford on the 4th for obtaining money and goods under false pretences. Found guilty, he was sentenced to seven years Transportation.

4th April 1801 – London Gazette

“Lieutenant Peter O’Hare to be Adjutant, vice Grant, who resigns.”

18th April 1801 – Various

The Corps of Riflemen were mentioned in the Houses of Parliament for assisting in the destruction of the Danish fleet on the 2nd April. Admiral Nelson, Rear Admiral Graves and Col. Stewart of the Corps of Riflemen were singled out.  This was the Battle of Copenhagen.

The 22nd April London Courier and others recorded how:

“Captain Grant, of the rifle regiment, who volunteered his services in the above expedition, and numbered with the killed, had his head taken off by a cannon ball, as effectively as it had been severed from his body by a scymeter. Captain Grant had been peculiarly unfortunate in battle, having received three wounds in one day in Holland.”

21st April 1801 – London Courier and Evening Gazette

Ooops!

“Lieut. Col. Stewart, in passing through the City yesterday in a post-chaise and four, from Yarmouth, was mistaken for a Russian officer, from the circumstance of his uniform being faced with green. He belongs to the Rifle Corps.”

Stewart was probably on his way to the Admiralty at the War Office to present despatches from Admiral Sir Hyde Parker and Admiral Nelson that an armistice had been concluded with Denmark. Stewart was shortly to be promoted to Colonel. Eight Riflemen had been killed in the action of the 2nd April.

19th May 1801 – London Gazette

Promotions

“Second Lieutenant James Macdonald to be First Lieutenant.

Second lieutenant James Prendergast to be First Lieutenant.”

8th June 1801 – Hampshire Chronicle

Referring to the 29th and 30th May:

“On Friday and Saturday last the rifle regiment, commanded by Colonel Manningham, marched in two divisions, from the barracks at Bletchington, on their route for Weymouth, where it is expected they will be camped.”

15th June 1801 – London Gazette

Promotion

“Lieut. Neill Campbell to be Captain, by purchase, vice Shepherd who retires.”

8th July 1801 – Morning Post

With reference to a display in front of the King at Weymouth:

“Colonel Manningham’s sharp-shooters were drawn out this morning to shoot at two targets. This Corps shew a wonderful dexterity and skill as they fire at the mark in the different attitudes of standing, sitting, kneeling and lying on their backs.”

18th July 1801 – London Gazette

Promotion

“Second Lieut. Sam Mitchell to be First Lieutenant by purchase, vie Campbell, promoted.”

18th August 1801 – Kentish Gazette

A reference in Weymouth on August 14th:

“We have a fine body of men here, called Riflemen, of the sharp shooters; they are well disciplined, and go through their manoeuvres with astonishing alertness.”

14th September 1801 – Morning Chronicle

They were still at Weymouth on September 12th and put on a display for the Royal Family.

“After breakfast Their Majesties and the princesses, with a number of their Nobility, rode in their carriages to Chickerell Common, where His Majesty reviewed Colonel Manningham’s corps of Riflemen, and the York Hussars, and also a detachment from other regiments. They went through their evolutions with great credit, particularly in repulsing the opposite party stationed for the defence of Portland Island. The whole of the manoeuvres were under the command of Colonels Stewart and Manningham, who have taken infinite pains to complete their regiments in the useful skill of military tactics. The bayonet charge was well supported; the assailing party being compelled to seek shelter in boats stationed in the water, produced a grand effect, and gave great satisfaction to the Royal Family and the spectators. After the review Their Majesties and Company were invited to partake of an elegant breakfast, provided by Colonel Manningham.”

5th October 1801 – London Courier and Evening Gazette

With reference to a report from Weymouth from October 2nd:

“The following is the destination of the troops that have been guarding His Majesty here this summer: The Rifle Corps struck their tents yesterday morning, and marched in two divisions, the one under Col. Manningham, the other under the command of Lieutenant-Colonel Stewart, to Bletchington Barracks, where they are to remain the winter.” 

6th October 1801 – London Gazette

Promotion

Lieut. McDonald, from the Glengary Fencibles, to be second lieutenant. Vice Burton, who is superceded, being absent without leave.

14th October 1801 – London Courier

A report from Lewes was printed referring to October 10th:

“On Saturday between three and four hundred of the Rifle Regiment, commanded by Col. Manningham, marched into Brighton, on their route from Weymouth to Bletchington Barracks.”

The movement of four companies had completed their move back to Bletchington on Wednesday 14th according to the London Courier.

15th January 1802 – London Courier

A report of death from exposure.

“One day last week a soldier, belonging to the Rifle Regiment stationed at Bletchington Barracks, was found a little distance from the main road between that place and Newhaven, lying on his face dead, with his nose frozen to the ground, and a hole in one of his cheeks, which had evidently been pecked by crows.  The deceased had, the day before his body was found, been sent to Lewes on errands, and having drank too freely, on his return, become exposed to the above fatal accident.” 

1st March 1802 – Sussex Advertiser

A report from Lewes

“The Rifle Regiment whose present station is Bletchington Barracks, it is expected, when the general removal of troops takes place, will be ordered to march for Stirling Castle, in Scotland.” 

16th March 1802 – London Gazette

Promotions

“Lieutenant John Stewart to be captain by purchase; vice Beckwith, promoted in the 15th Foot. Ensign Richard Green, from the 9th Foot, to be second lieutenant, by purchase, vice Mitchell, promoted.” 

20th March 1802 – London Gazette

Appointment

“Lieutenant J. Crampton, from the 68th Foot, to be Lieutenant, vice Prendergast, who exchanges.”

7th March 1802 – London Gazette

Promotion

“Second lieutenant T. Brereton to be first lieutenant by purchase, vice Stewart, promoted”. 

6th April 1802 – London Gazette

Promotion

“Major G. Callendar to be lieut-col by purchase, vice McLeroth who retires.” 

27th April 1802 – London Gazette

Appointment

“Captain Amos Godfil Norcott from 33rd to be Captain, vice Cuyler, who exchanges.” 

4th May 1802 – London Gazette

Promoted

“Major T. Sidney Beckwith, from 15th, to be major, by purchase, vice Callender, promoted.” 

20th August 1802 – Kentish Weekly Post

A report from Canterbury of Tuesday August 18th notes a move from Bletchington:

“Last week marched through Maidstone, in different divisions, on route to Chatham barracks, the whole of the rifle corps, who have lately been in different detachments on foreign service; and, it is said, they will shortly embark for the East Indies.” 

12th October 1802 – Kentish Weekly Post

From a despatch dated 7th October 1802. This is the first reference to Shorncliffe:

“The Rifle Corps have marched from Chatham Barracks to Shornecliffe, and the batteries along the coast from Hythe to Dungeness, the respective barracks of which, we understand, are made permanent.”

25th January 1803 – Kentish Weekly Post

From London 25th January:

“The Light Infantry Corps of the several regiments of the line are about to be furnished with rifle-barrels, and are in future to act as Riflemen. The Rifle Corps is to constitute the 95th Regiment and in future to be so termed.”

18th March 1803 – Kentish Weekly Post

The earliest mention of the signature green uniform comes at this point. It was taken from the 1pm Courier Office despatch from London of the same day. This was reported in many newspapers.

“Companies of Riflemen are to be formed, composed of the best marksman of every regiment of Militia, and to be brigaded together in battalions, to acquire the necessary evolutions; their uniform to be green.”

24th May 1803 – Kentish Weekly Post

“This day five companies of the 95th, or Rifle Corps, move from Shorncliffe and Hythe, for Bletchington, in Sussex.”

 6th June 1803 – Hampshire Chronicle

A Portsmouth despatch of June 4th relating to the 2nd:

“Arrived the Warrior transport, Capt. Dodd from Ireland; she landed 28 recruits at Cowes and 18 riflemen sailed in her on Thursday for Dover.”

7th June 1803 – Kentish Weekly Post

“Major General Moore has taken his residence at Sandgate; as soon as the encampments are formed, his brigade consisting of the 4th, 52nd, 59th 70th, and five companies of the 95th, or rifle corps will be assembled. Part of them are to encamp near Shornecliffe, and the residue will guard the line of batteries along the coast from Shornecliffe to Dungeness.” 

1st August 1803 – Hampshire Telegraph.

A report from Sussex dated 30th July indicates the regiment had moved:

“The 95th, or Rifle Regiment, now quartered at Seaford, are 800 strong, under the command of Colonel Manningham, Lieutenant Colonel Stewart, and Majors Wade and Stewart. They are in such a complete state of discipline, and such excellent marksmen, that they are sure to hit a target at 150 yards distance. 

29th August 1803 – Evening Mail

A despatch from Brighton from Friday 26th describes a Militia drill camp at North Parade and an inspection by the Prince.

“This evening the Corps of Riflemen, attached to the Sussex Regiment, consisting of one hundred men, were drawn up on the Cliff of the Marine Parade, in front of the camp to practice firing at a mark. The object was a ball of wood, the size of a man’s head, moored about three hundred yards from the shore and floating in the water. The emulation of marksmanship was excited by small wagers amongst the men; and so keen was their avidity, and so true their aim, that most of the shots struck the mark. The Corps is principally composed of Gamekeepers and experienced Shots. Their uniform is a dark green jacket, and white pantaloons with beaver hat and black plume. Their belts are of black leather. They take their aim when lying flat on their bellies, using their hats as rests for their rifles.” 

6th September 1803 – Evening Mail

“General Moore’s Brigade, consisting of the 4th or King’s Own Regiment, 52nd Light Infantry, 59th, 70th and Rifle Corps, which has been encamped at Shorn Cliff for some time embarked, on Sunday and Monday, on board transports and armed vessels, assembled for the purpose in the Downs. The expedition is said to have sailed on Tuesday, steering a westerly course.”

12th September 1803 – Saunder’s News-letter

A military publication was now available to buy from J. Stewart, Military Stationer at No.1 King’s Inn Quay, Dublin, and other booksellers:

“Regulations for the Exercise of Riflemen and Light Infantry, and instructions for their Conduct in the Field – 9 Plates  – 3s 9 1/2d.” 

1st October 1803 – Cobbett’s Weekly Political Register

This records that:

“Troops in the Brighton Camp, the Gloucester and Sussex Militia, together with some Corps of Riflemen are to be immediately employed in cutting sluices at Pevensey Level, near Hastings, in order that the whole of that part of the country may be inundated in case of invasion.” 

27th October 1803 – Morning Chronicle

A further move on the 24th:

“The Rifle Corps stationed at Bletchington Barracks late on Saturday night received a route for their removal from that place to Chelmsford, in Essex, and on Monday they commenced their March accordingly.” 

27th October 1803 – Morning Chronicle (and many local newspapers)

The following editorial comment was made which was reprinted in many papers nationally during the following week:

“The public will rejoice to hear that the Corps of Riflemen are daily augmenting, and as the principles and objects of this species of warfare come to be more known, there is little doubt but that similar bodies will be formed all over the country. It is true that a rifleman fights always in an ambush, instead of presenting himself openly to his adversary, he seeks shelter behind every bush, hillock and tree – but his adversary does the same, and it is an inefficient trial of skill, vigilance and activity between them. No man is so obnoxious to danger, for an unguarded exposure of the person for a single instant is almost certain death. It is, therefore, a gallant and hazardous, as well as a most useful service. Since it is admitted into legitimate war, we must report to it; and certainly no country is so peculiarly adapted to this species of annoyance as Great Britain, where every hedge, ditch, bush, and briar, will be the means of stopping the progress of an invading enemy.” 

20th December 1803 – Kentish Weekly Post

An inspection somewhere in London was recorded:

“Wednesday morning the Hon. Artillery Company were inspected by Lieutenant Colonel Harnage, who was highly pleased with the manoeuvres and appearance of the regiment, particularly so of a company of riflemen, which has lately been picked from the line, and appeared in uniform for the first time; their clothing is dark green, and black worsted twist in front, with black belts, black powder horns, black feathers, and rifle pieces, bronzed, forming altogether a sable appearance, but adapted for the purpose intended. The whole muster was 1024 men under arms.” 

13th January 1804 – Kentish Gazette

“Brigadier General Manningham has been appointed to succeed Sir Charles Green in command of the Militia at Dover, and Captain Cameron of the Rifle Regiment, his Major of Brigade.”

A follow up on the 17th:

“Brigadier General Manningham has arrived in Dover, and takes charge of the brigade, lately under General Greene, who sets off for the West Indies.”

His command included the Canterbury Volunteer Infantry and Cinque Ports Volunteer Infantry. 

30th April 1804 – Morning Post

Funeral of the aforementioned Captain Cameron.

“On the 9th instant, at Shorncliffe Barracks, in the 22nd year of his age, extremely regretted, Captain Alexander Duncan Cameron, of the 95th (Rifle) Regiment. The internment took place yesterday, with military honours, and was attended by his regiment, Major-General Moore, Brigadier-General Manningham, and all the Officers of the Brigade, thus playing a melancholy tribute of respect to the memory of a brother officer, who (to quote Major-General Moore’s order on the occasion), from the worth of his character, his honourable and upright conduct, was in every respect entitled to it.” 

A monument was set up in the Parish church at Cheriton by his fellow officers. Designed by Spratt and Jones, it was a dove-coloured marble tablet representing an Egyptian sarcophagus surmounted by a crown and bugle. It was inscribed as follows:

Alexander Duncan Cameron, Captain to H.M. 95th, or Rifle Regt.

Son of Captain Charles Cameron, of Callart, Lochaber, N.E.

Who died at Shorncliff on the 8th day of April 1804 aged 22 years.

As a tribute of respect

To his many amiable qualities,

To commemorate the sense of his worth,

As a gentleman and a scholar,

This stone has been erected

By his brother officers.

He had been born on 14th January 1782 in Edinburgh, son of Captain Charles Cameron and Elizabeth Jean Mckenzie (source: Ancestry).

7th August 1804 – Kentish Weekly Post

“Saturday the brigade at Shorncliffe camp under Major-General Moore, consisting of the 43rd and 52nd Light Infantry, the 95th, or rifle corps, marched from camp to Swinfield Minnis where they performed several field evolutions in the presence of a large assemblage of spectators, a great part of them military, went from this city to Barhams Down Camp.” 

23rd August 1804

An inspection of the Shorncliffe Garrison by the Duke of York took place at Sandgate. Several companies took part and a mock skirmish was carried out.

3rd September 1804 – Morning Chronicle

A Chosen duel! The Morning Chronicle revealed a duel that took place on Sunday 26th August 1804 at Shorncliffe between two officers of the 95th. Captain Campbell fought a duel with Lieutenant Travers, Lieutenant De Jersey seconded Campbell and Captain Gordon seconded Travers. Straight after the duel Travers and Gordon immediately absconded from the camp. Campbell was rushed to hospital and the pistol ball was removed from his thigh, however he died four days later of his wounds. Campbell was buried with full military honours on the Friday attended by officers and other several regiments. He was, according to the papers, ‘a most worthy man, a good soldier, and his loss of life is universally regretted’. Some papers refer to Campbell as Captain Cameron.

Travers did return, was promoted to Captain by 1805 and Major by 1807. He led the 2nd Battalion on the attack on Buenos Aires in 1807 and was badly injured.

15th September 1804 – Norfolk Chronicle

Bugle-Major John Kelly of the 95th published “The Bugle Horn Sounds”. This consisted of sixty field sounds with explanatory notes, seventeen regimental or duty sounds, a selection of quick and slow marches adapted for the use of Riflemen or Light Infantry. Cost 7s 6d, available at Messrs. Stevenson and Matchett, Market-Place, Norfolk and other booksellers.

17th November 1804 – Caledonian Mercury.

“It was on Tuesday strongly reported, that the brigade under the command of General Moore is to be employed to the Cape of Good Hope. It consists of the 4th, or King’s Own, the 43rd and 52nd light infantry, the 59th and 95th rifle regiment, five companies, which is to have a second battalion immediately.”

This means that we can trace the earliest home movements of the Rifle Corps as follows:

1800 March – formation at Horsham at barracks.

1800 May (first week) – march to Bagshot under canvas. On 25th August three Companies took part in a failed amphibious landing at Ferrol, Spain to dislodge the defenders.

1800 September 3rd – march from Bagshot to Bletchington barracks at Seaford. In April 1801 one Company took part in Battle of Copenhagen.

1801 May 29/30th – march to Weymouth to protect the King throughout the summer.

1801 October 10th – march from Weymouth back to Bletchington Barracks.

1802 August (mid) – march from Bletchington Barracks to Chatham.

1802 October (first week) – march from Chatham to Shorncliffe. Green uniforms and rifles received in the spring of 1803.

1803 May 24th – march back to Bletchington Barracks at Seaford.

1803 June (mid) – march of five companies to Shorncliffe to patrol the defences.

1803 August (early) – temporary camp at Brighton.

1803 September (first week) – a number of companies embarked with the fleet for an attack on Cherbourg.

1803 October 24 – march from Bletchington to Chelmsford.

1804 winter – return to Shorncliffe by March.

Written and researched by Phillip Eyden  

Sourced from The British Libraries Local Newspaper Archive.

Rifleman Plunket

 Articles  Comments Off on Rifleman Plunket
Dec 182016
 

Rifleman Thomas Plunket

Thomas Plunket (1785–1839) was an Irish soldier in the British Army’s 95th Rifles regiment. He served throughout the Peninsular War and later in the Waterloo Campaign of 1815. He is remembered for killing a French General, (General Colbert) during the Peninsular War, by hitting him with an extremely long range shot.

Early life and Army Career

Thomas Plunket was born in 1785 in Newtown, Wexford, Ireland. He joined the 95th Rifles in May 1805. In 1807, he took part in the British invasions of the River Plate (1806-1807).

During the 2nd Battle of Buenes Aires, the 95th Rifles were heavily engaged in street-fighting during which Plunket killed around 20 Spanish troops while sniping from a rooftop with others from his unit. They retreated when Spanish artillery bombarded their position with grapeshot.

Plunket also shot a Spanish officer, who was waving a white handkerchief with the possible intention of inviting a truce. This resulted in further Spanish artillery bombardment which ended with the British surrender.
Plunket is mainly remembered for a feat at the Battle of Cacabelos during Moore’s retreat to Corunna in 1809.

Here Plunket shot the French Général de Brigade Auguste-Marie-François Colbert at a range of around 600 metres (2,000 ft) using a Baker rifle.

Plunket had run forward to make this shot. Before returning to his own lines he reloaded and shot down Colbert’s aide-de-camp, Latour-Maubourg, who had rushed to the aid of the fallen general, which showed that the first shot had not been a fluke; the deaths were sufficient to throw the pending French attack into disarray.

The shots were at a sufficiently long distance to impress others in the 95th Rifles, whose marksmanship (with the Baker rifle) was far better than the ordinary British soldiers who were armed with a Brown Bess musket and only trained to shoot into a body of men at 50 metres (160 ft) with volley fire.

Later life

In 1817, Plunket was discharged from the 95th after recovering from the head wound he received at the Battle of Waterloo. Awarded a pension of 6d a day, he soon enlisted back into the army in a line regiment, 41st Foot. The regiment was being inspected by his former commanding officer, General Sir Thomas Sydney Beckwith when the general recognised Plunket and inquired into what had happened to him.

He was invited to the officers mess that night and the next day was promoted to corporal, and soon also had his pension raised to one shilling a day with Beckwith’s influence. He later renounced his pension in exchange for four years’ pay and land in Canada, but he returned to England after a year, considering the land unsuitable.

Plunket and his wife returned to the United Kingdom and, nearly destitute, made a small living as itinerant traders. Plunket died suddenly at Colchester in 1839. Several retired officers in the town heard about the death and recognized his name; as a result, they took up a collection for his widow and paid for his funeral and gravestone.

Sourced from Wikipedia 

Picture sourced from Google / 95th-Rifles.co.uk

For a full write up on Rifleman Plunket see the link below

http://www.napoleon-series.org/research/biographies/c_plunkett.html